| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62
Comments:
<0> not something to be revoked
<1> greetings, oh high priest of the orderly lawn!
<2> Greetings
<0> but maybe require people to attend counselling, courses, etc before they get married
<0> forarm and forewarn them
<3> the lisence part of marriage was all about getting the state to say you had no vd. look it up
<4> make them take a quiz and a road test, to get marrid
<4> married
<0> take away all that disney romanticized BS
<3> you could not getr m,earried until you proved you had no vd
<0> really?
<3> yup
<5> why is govt involved in marriage at all?
<3> started when the state wanted to stamp out syphillus
<1> yeah, from back in the days before there were cures for STDs. oh, wait...
<0> but wouldn't it be beneficial to require people who want to get legally married to actually learn things like conflict management, bit about child rearing, stress management, etc?
<3> cuz, you should not get married if you have syphillus
<6> and you couldn't have *** unles you were married! no more syphillus! why didn't it work?!?!?
<4> what's the big deal about gay marriage ? All marriage is gay anyway
<7> Oax: hehehehehe
<7> US_Male: hahaha
<1> tttwisted: not sure its a valid premise, since one is probably insane to get married.
<7> to the ****ing *core*
<4> that's a recycled joke
<8> falter: helpful, yes...but they should have learned that from their fathers and mothers...unfortunately, society is deteriorating in its social mores
<4> heheh
<7> I don't care, it's gold
<3> falter: no. the state cannot regulate interpersonal relationships
<4> it is good
<3> that is just going too far
<0> iamking: precisely why we need that kind of thing now
<8> US-Male should know...he was married to TomM!
<0> to teach people what they're not learning from family
<4> he's too old for me
<3> falter: no. that is totalitarian
<7> IamKing: nah, the parental role is just shifting elsewhere
<0> how is that totalitarian?
<3> think about what you prescribe
<4> also he has no vagina
<7> and is therefore much less effective and much more annoying
<7> though parents are inherently ineffective and annoying
<3> the state should not be regulating personal relationships
<9> when you drink out of crystal gl***ware, how exposed are you to lead anyway? will it really dissolve into whatever you're drinking?
<0> but it does anyway
<0> in lots of other areas
<0> this isn't boot camp
<5> amen tttwisted
<7> IamKing: here's a link to what I'm talking about: http://www.emspowercop.com/
<0> it's just saying here, here's some tools you can use
<3> no. it doesn't, if there is no crime, there is no regulation
<7> well, check out that link :)
<3> crime means, fraud or violence
<0> 7
<8> tttwisted: there will always be crime, thus always be regulation
<2> [22:50] * IamKing doesn't have a ****ing clue
<7> he's a slashdot reader. what'd you expect?
<2> Hey I am a Journalist now!
<8> tweek: black!
<0> all i'm saying is.. if the state has the ability to issue a licence for marriage at all, it ought to have the right to require people to prepare for it a little
<10> This is hilarious, the moonbats are on cspan2 talking about impeaching Bush
<7> ****, yeah, was about to say
<5> regulation of marriage is wastefull and unnecessary
<3> iamking. actually, regulation is what an agency does to decipher a law, an act, that congres makes. generally congressional acts are not precise. so its either an agency or a court that makes the ruls
<0> but it's not regulation
<0> there's no enforcement afterwards
<11> moonbats. haha
<3> and the courts generally test the rules to see if they meet the standard
<12> i agree one hundred percent with poluted
<0> it's just here, attend a few seminars, learn some stuff, carry on
<7> I mean, though, here's a device that's not only ineffective at what it's designed to do, it's marketed toward people that most likely wouldn't use them after a month of seeing how annoying they are...
<8> no, it's necessary...we need documentation of the "civil union" because civil law has many laws on the books regarding property rights in relation to marriage
<0> you ignore it, that's up to you..
<10> Bwahahahaha, there's the head moonbat, Ramsey Clark is there, shouldn't he be in Baghdad defending Saddam
<1> Rockfish: well, if one is stupid enough to think the clinton impeachment was about a blowjob, one is stupid enough to think Bush has done something impeachable.
<7> they're marketed to parents that want to avoid having to play bad cop every now and then...
<3> the agency is a bureaurracy that enforces and interprests the law, or act. that is waht agency means
<7> I mean, ****, the act of using the damned things is inherently just that
<5> why would you want the govt involved in your love life?
<3> see the ada. that law was just so imprecise it invited litigation, and that is what is happening.
<3> the courts are forced to interpret
<7> "What other activities you say, what about time for School & Studies, time for Play & Exercise, and time with Friends & Family to name a few." <--- and it's apparently marketed to people who think that they'll be able to spend more quality time with their kids if they'd just get off of those damned white boxes that I don't know what they are
<8> poluted: because there are laws in the books that detail property rights for married couples...and whether you like it or not, those laws are NEVER going away
<3> congress is too wuss to make laws that have any meaning
<12> you all must agree that although no the courts should have no authority over ones love life but
<7> selfish dip**** ***holes that never should have been parents in the first place, and now they need a box to tell their kids to do something else.
<3> they know they do it. the do it intnetionaly
<7> ****ing pussies, all of you.
<1> tweek: that is my ***ual preference, yes.
<3> tweek, you have no clue about being a parent
<7> Homer Simpson, smiling politely
<3> you re not a parent
<7> tttwisted: a fair accusation, I'll admit.
<5> haha
<3> that was too easy
<7> well, what? you expect me to say that I'm the ****ing expert in this stuff?
<5> it makes a difference
<3> i need stoganoff
<3> tweek: but, thing is, most people who critique parents are not parents. it is not easy to grow a human being
<7> I know that this is definitely not the way for irresponsible parents to offload their parental duties to something they'll eventually leave unlocked all the time anyway
<1> well, in tweek's defense, one does not have to have parental experience to spot bad parenting techniques.
<4> bad parenting causes kds to be like tweek
<7> **** yes it does
<4> see, it's not tweek's fault
<4> it's mommy and daddy's
<7> I'm a walking mother****ing argument against corporal punishment
<12> and circumstances
<0> i'm a parent of 3. i try not to criticize but when you see parents plainly not doing their duty it does kind of make you angry
<1> tweek: but you are making a convincing argument for capital punishment
<7> nah, I simply don't care that I'm an ***hole.
<7> Jakyl: hahahahaha
<4> lol
<3> i was visiting my gandaughter and i needed a diaper. "where is the diaper?' "yeah grammy, where is the diaper?" she thought it was a game. she was following me around the house looking for the diapers. with her hands out.
<3> how do you teach someone to do kids
<12> excuse me
<5> u just cring
<12> do kids?
<0> i really wish someone had sat me and my wife down and explained all the stresses you go through with kids
<3> she knew where they were
<0> all the things you think are the end of the world but really are nothing but normal
<7> falter: I'll sum it up for you: it ****s.
<0> some people really crack under that stress
<3> it was a parade, me, the baby, the dog, the cat. looking for diapers. everyone knew where they were but me
<13> kids are easy ;)
<0> why not put some tools out there to help them cope
<14> IamKing whats that rpg online game you tried to get me to play years ago.. not d2, the other one
<7> because 1) **** like this doesn't work
<5> tttwisted you have grand children?
<0> or maybe have them decide right then and there, I'm not having kids, I can't handle that
<4> bud: that was "Butt*** 2000"
<7> for one, power cables are easily replaced
<13> Plus when they get older, you send them to college and they bring you back good weed
<8> bud``: EQ?
<3> i have a 2 yr old grilchild
<7> for two, the lock is a ****ing computer case lock. easiest lock ever to crack
<14> US_Male, no, that was twobar's thing
<4> oh
<14> IamKing yeah thats it. tnx
<1> tttwisted: this a result of the son that needs wisdom?
<7> 2) this is overdoing it. clearly. especially when rationing power can clearly interfere with other stuff. could you imagine a kid trying to do a kernel compile if his box was power-locked?
<5> tttwisted and you are complaining about your child's parenting abilities?
<4> I can give you wisdom. Just like the Wizard of Oz
<5> tttwisted where do you think your child got the ability to parnt from?
<3> jakyl: my son is staying the course, but he is needing some reinforcement from the male side, i am only able to give him sympathy
<3> poluted: oh no. i am saying it is not something you can regulate, growing human beings
<13> back when I was a kid, we didn't wear seatbelts, parents let us have keg parties at graduation, our parents had it easy
<1> tttwisted: tell him women are meant to be loved, not understood
<5> what about you regulating that tttwisted?
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#online
#beginner
alan11111
#slackware
toddedwards
Phillip Knoll+minnesota
#gentoo
#gamedev
dovecot Mailbox isn't selectable
disapline employees
|
|