| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
Comments:
<0> The only thing they have going for them is prosecutorial judgement.
<1> fr33 heya
<2> Fr33Trade: has a court ever ruled on this?
<3> Fr33Trade, yes, the FISA laws do not matter
<0> Hey Sting!
<4> Sting is
<0> This one gets a one day p***.
<2> Fr33Trade: has a court ever ruled on this?
<0> The other one was here the other day acting like an *** so he gets ****listed.
<1> fr33 hey spilled coffee on keyboard washed it off still feels sticky. do i need a new keybooard
<0> Lithium, On the press ? Many many times.
<1> jett heya
<4> heya ;)
<5> `stingray put it in the dishwasher
<1> dishwasher
<2> Fr33Trade: show me a court ruling that says press cannot print cl***ified material leaked to it
<0> And the decision has always been they do not have any right to protect a source of an illegal act nor the right to publish with intent a cl***ified document which they know is not legal to print
<5> but you gotta let it dry for a day or so
<1> i called ibm they are sending a new keyboard
<4> heh
<1> DB luuckey it didnt go into the mother board
<5> i ejaculated on mine accidentally and dishwasher worked great
<2> Fr33Trade: again, cite case
<1> lol
<0> Lithium. You go study it yourself I just listened to a lawyer list a dozen cases which I cant remember the name of.
<1> ya this is a laptop
<1> fr33 hey bro got more sybd now at 1 and 1/2 mil shares
<2> im aware they cant protect their sources, i've never heard of a case involving printing the leak
<6> This channel pisses me off
<0> But this constitutional expert who testified before congress said it was never there, Jonathon Turley who is an *** anyway claims its a unwritten law that they havent observed..
<1> blizill hey brother vet happy memorial day
<6> the freedom of press is vital
<6> happy mem day
<6> :(
<6> Im just drinking my ***
<0> So even this far left fruitcake admits they havent admitted this law which he things exists which gives the media immunity, thats such bull****
<6> off
<6> cant think about it
<4> turley ****s me up
<1> blizill yep i got 200 flags to put on vets grave monday
<0> Freedom of Press is vital
<6> I only drink one day a year
<0> This channel however is for intelligent and serious debate.
<1> lol
<6> this is the day
<1> bliz hehehehe
<0> And this chanel has debate under a structure
<5> were u in nam
<1> yep
<6> yah you mean a right wing controled ideaology
<4> this channel is politics
<1> DB you
<0> But no man is above the law the courts have affirmed this 1000 times..
<4> what I like about it
<5> no im only 23
<1> ok
<2> Fr33Trade: again, cite case please
<0> And spevifically they have affirmed it with the press many times.
<6> Im so glad november is right around the corner
<5> im 23 but the recruiters were on my ID yesterday
<5> i wonder if they notice when u dont pay taxes
<1> db heheh ya gonna join
<5> it was weird
<5> hells no
<0> Why do you think that woman from I think Time Magazine sat in jail for 6 months ?
<1> lol
<0> For doing something legal ?
<2> Fr33Trade: i told you, i know they cant protect sources.
<4> New York Time, Judith Miller
<2> Fr33Trade: and judith miller wasnt in jail for 6 months
<4> times
<2> it was like a month
<0> Jett, Yep sorry you got it rigth.
<1> publus was gonna join i told him it would make awoamn out of him
<0> She didnt go to jail for nothing it was a court order.
<1> fr33 hey wake up
<6> o'reilly's no spin zone is hilarious
<6> he is uber spin
<1> fr33 hey wake up
<0> for not revealing her source
<4> Judith's always been out there....always liked her.
<2> blizzil: but if he says he doesnt spin, it makes it true
<0> in my lifetime I have seen 100 members of the press go to jail for not revealing a source.
<0> Why did judith miller get out of jail ?
<4> yeah
<2> Fr33Trade: again, im not debating that part
<0> She revealed her source.
<5> mossad busted her out
<1> she had big tits thats why
<2> Fr33Trade: im not arguing that
<4> she got press, that's all
<7> Hundreds dead, thousands hurt in Indonesia quake
<2> Fr33Trade: show a court ruling that says press cant publish cl***ified leaks
<0> Lithium You are debating that its legal for the press to put forth cl***ified information and to protect the sources.
<2> wow
<0> neither are true
<2> do you even bother reading what im saying?
<1> lithium no
<4> Judith was going for a Pulitzer, she didn't get it, that's my guess.
<0> and if you are only debating one of the two , its not true, either one.
<1> no one does
<0> There has never been any ambiguity about this in the courts.
<2> <2> im aware they cant protect their sources, i've never heard of a case involving printing the leak
<2> <2> Fr33Trade: i told you, i know they cant protect sources.
<0> They cant leak information either which they know is cl***ified.
<2> ok
<1> blizill hey my friend a civilain training iraq police he got hit by shrapnel luck superficial. but now he knows how it feels
<0> Its a crime.
<2> Fr33Trade: court ruling please regarding printing leaked cl***ified info
<4> yeah, but they do
<8> http://www.tooshocking.com/index.php?ns=view_vid&id=452 go buzz aldrin!
<0> The history though is that if the public good outweighs the danger of the story significantly they dont punish..
<0> You may see a prosecution and this law tested with the New York Times soon. We will see.
<2> Fr33Trade: actually they never punished
<0> Lithium, Not because the law forbids it the Supreme court has made clear they are not exempt from prosecution.
<2> name a journalist that was punished for printing leaked cl***ified info
<4> Presidents have suspended many constitutionaly guaranteed basics....Lincoln....Roosevelt.....
<0> Usually there is not the political will to punish them
<1> fordnut hey just went an looked at a 55 t bird
<1> 56
<2> Fr33Trade: in which case?
<4> yep
<1> fordnut continental kit on back kelsey hays wheels all orig
<0> The govenrment and the press have a relationship where the press can be very intimidating.
<4> that's right
<4> yep
<2> Fr33Trade: name a journalist that was punished for printing leaked cl***ified info
<2> ever
<0> They said that the NSA Eavesdropping case uncovered 2 plots, one in England and one in the USA and that the program was extremely successful and well crafted (These are the dems and reps who have seen it). We know it worked.. Now Al Queda knows some of what we are doing and they have already changed some of their methods of communication.
<0> This leak damaged national security and got soliders killed in adghanistan and Iraq.
<0> You can be sure of that.
<0> Peopled died who didnt need to for the profit of the New york times
<2> Fr33Trade: they said it uncovered a plot, they didnt offer any proof
<0> The intelligence committe bi partisan admitted this
<2> when?
<2> admitted what?
<4> It's amazing.
<0> Yesterday when they had their public conference which I watched and you didnt.
<1> \\\\
<0> It was on Cspan
<1> \\\
<4> bad bad
<2> Fr33Trade: then im sure you can find it in the transcript
<4> Course, I missed it too.
<0> People died because of reporters in the USA.. Now should people who have leaked our most sensitive intelligence which has the strongest protection under the law be allowed to go free ? I dont think so I think they should be prosecuted and so should the reporter and spend a year or two in prison
<2> oh, and who died?
<9> Lithium- all I can find is that the legislation that would allow people to be arrested for publishing cl***ified/leaked material has been buried somewhere since the 50's
<0> Im talking about a Specific Story
<0> The NSA leak
<1> funny when clinton leaked no lib press bitched
<0> Which was a program which worked.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#mirc
#gentoo
#hardware
#windows
isrealpass
#mirc
#sendmail
#dsl
#politics
|
|