| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Comments:
<0> Operas are cool if you are into them.
<1> ice cream, milk, etc
<2> occ: i disagree.. Das Reingold = God
<1> all bad
<0> I prefer movies frankly
<1> same with any sugary drink
<3> the only reingold im familiar with is the ****ty beer ;)
<1> lemonade, very bad
<0> And i like very adventursome movies
<2> but katey knows what is best for her vocal cords ;-)
<3> and redfish, i stand by my statement!
<4> I like blondes
<0> by the way listen if you have dish especially.... SAHARA is an EXCELLENT movie.
<4> and when they eat ice cream it's even better
<5> people who like cl***ical music but not opera are doodooheads , they get turned off just because one of the instruments is a voice and they think of frilly singing
<2> Occ: a pity.. i caught Das Reingold at Severance Hall.. georgious
<1> never heard of it
<0> And right now its $1.99 on the last chance channel on PPV
<1> Sahara?
<0> Sahara...
<2> FT: which one? the origional? :-)
<3> i dont generally like live music, though
<0> Dont let the title fool you its a great moview.
<1> I still want to see Syriana
<0> Lots of good action, A good plot, A fun story
<0> Lets see did I see that.
<0> hm
<0> m
<0> I may have..
<1> never heard anything about Sahara
<1> I also want to see "good night and good luck"
<0> Katey do see it, you wont regret it.
<2> FT: why would it be on pay per view? it's been out since 1943
<5> katey also wants to see capote
<1> redfish, yeah, actually I do. :)
<0> Lupine this is the latest Sahara..
<1> I like good movies
<3> its about four friends crossing the sahara on camels
<2> bah.. :P if it doesn't have bogart..
<0> I guess since its a big desert there are lots of movies about it.
<3> and how they bond with each other along the way
<0> :)
<1> I'm not much for pulpy boring action flicks though
<0> Not as D zert
<2> "Sahara" is a Bogart WWII film
<0> but a DEZ ART
<3> a desilu
<1> heh
<1> bbl
<1> story time for the kids
<2> naw... De zert
<4> aw
<4> have fun. :)
<2> katey: Timur would like that
<5> katey i really dont think all of the movies nominated were the best movies this year. there were a lot of films that got little attention , the ones that got attention this year had a political slant. but then there are categories of movies that no matter how good they are never get nominated because they dont fit hollywoods fashion that year
<0> No this one has a Navy Seal and a WHO worker trying to find the source of disease, while the seals are treasure hunting.
<0> I will say no more.
<0> EX navy seals
<3> theres an online movement to "out" people who claim to be navy seals
<3> its kinda funny
<0> Lots of action and a good story, and good acting..
<3> picture tom arnold in true lies
<0> Occ haha, he wasnt seals though he was CIA
<3> er, not tom arnold
<0> Or soemthing similar
<3> tthe guy who pretended to be a secret agent
<4> anyway, until someone gives me a source saying some Gulf States told Hamas to recognize Israel, I don't believe it.
<3> to gain prestige
<0> I got to split anyway, food and maybe another movie tonight ;)
<3> tom arnold was actually pretty funny in that movie
<0> Timur, try fox news
<2> occ: yea
<3> as the "foil"
<4> FT: not on the website.. that I saw
<0> it replays at 1:00 AM I think Eastern
<0> or their website.
<2> occ: on the flip side.. my grandfather detested most "airbourne".. as he said.. if you havn't made a combat jump.. you are NOT airbourne
<4> at least I finally got an answer... thanks. :)
<3> parachuting?
<2> occ: parachuting != combat jump!
<6> Granddad was wrong
<3> fine, "parachuting with a gun"!
<4> gunz!
<2> parachuting into combat :P
<4> segue to Lup
<4> brb
<2> Tailor: i think the modern term is now "air ***ault".. but that isn't paratroopers
<3> i know why people say "geronimo"
<7> actually
<3> so i rule
<7> the modern term is 'aerial forced entry'
<6> Air ***ault is jumping out of choppers
<8> occ: one who yawns?
<3> yes, but thats a silly euphemism, herzen
<7> thats the term
<7> esp when armor is used
<6> Herzen, not here
<3> its like "collateral damage" or "friendly fire"
<6> Air ***ault
<6> Paratroops have their own badge, as does air ***ault, planes and choppers
<2> In any event, he made three combat jumps, in two wars.. WWII and Korea
<3> real clever, iamking
<3> ive heard that quote attributed to at least five people
<7> thats also my /qiuit
<7> err /quit
<7> to bad i never leave
<5> herzen express your anger that you cant use cyrillic characters on irc
<2> red: his real anger is no cyrillic in OFP
<7> there is cyrillic in ofp
<7> newbs
<9> bewbs
<2> herzen: you can name your character in cyrillic?
<2> best forumn response *EVAR*!!!!!!
<3> NEVAR!
<2> some guy was asking about his GF, who was "anti gun" and he carried regularly
<2> http://www.thehighroad.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=35970&d=1140650579
<2> that is someone's response to him :-)
<3> the thing about carrying that i thought was ridiculous lately was
<3> there was a contingent claiming it was "illegal" for employers to ban gun carrying on their premises
<2> well, in some states it is.
<2> and it can be argued it is "unconstitutional"
<9> in NY it is
<3> thats ridiculous
<9> you can't even have a can of pepper spray
<3> oh, i meant, not allowing employers to ban that is ridiculous
<3> leave it in the car, tough guy
<2> occ: depends really. I would say, it ought to be the same for anyone, including police officer [ not without a warrant ]
<2> occ: well, in most states the employer can ban concealed carry.. can also ban in the vehicle
<3> yah
<3> as they should be able to
<9> thats ok, if i get shot or something on the employers premises i will sue the employer for inadequate security/protection
<2> if its illegal to bar LEO's from carrying [ without a warrant, mind you ].. then it ought to be illegal to bar lawful permit holders
<3> why?
<3> meaning
<3> its generally accepted that LEOs can carry a weapon in the US, period
<2> occ: yes/no. it has to do with the basis of authority [ the law, not the cops ]
<2> if you agree the state has a right to excert over private property..
<3> basically, what i mean is
<2> for LEO's.. then it has the authority for other people
<9> WASHINGTON - The discovery of a furry, beaver-like animal that lived at the time of dinosaurs has overturned more than a century of scientific thinking about Jur***ic mammals.
<3> i dont think LEOs should be banned from carrying; i dont think that infringes on the rights of the individual, to allow their employer to ban carrying
<9> The find shows that the ecological role of mammals in the time of dinosaurs was far greater than previously thought, said Zhe-Xi Luo, curator of vertebrate paleontology at Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh.
<9> The animal is the earliest swimming mammal to have been found and was the most primitive mammal to be preserved with fur, which is important to helping keep a constant body temperature, Luo said in a telephone interview.
<9> sweet
<9> what about dolphins
<2> occ: well, for "pure" private property, i.e. no public access.. one can certainly ban an officer from carrying [ if he has no search warrant ]
<2> occ: for example, if an officer asks to look in your house.. you can say "Yes, as long as you leave your gun outside".
<3> well, i ***ume you can refuse entry to the officer (obviously)
<3> so its not specific to the carrying of a weapon
<2> of course, if he has a search warrant.. that is a different question
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#online
gentoo pam_login
mirc for ubuntu
celeron 798mhz
simon Garbunkle
#computers
www.cs.cornell.edu/~djm/ubuntu
#gentoo
#worldcup
|
|