| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Comments:
<0> BOO ..
<1> Lupine: yep
<2> e-herni: war is hell.. we did not choose this war
<3> Lupine: which war are you talking about?
<4> hello
<5> Comet and they don't talk about the Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Dutch and few other foreign countries that also own parts of other ports --
<1> Lupine: except a gun does little good against a bomber or an automatic weapon or a tank
<4> the Iraq war is pretty much over as far as major US involvement goes
<2> Comet: this is just ANOTHER attempt for congress to disolve any role of the executive branch, in this case, the various govn't agencies which regulate large company aquisitions
<5> Comet -- nor do they like being reminded that in 1998 Clinton sold 60 F16s to Dubai (UAE)
<3> The War on Iraq is a real war - the War on Terror is similar to the War on Drugs and the War on Commies
<4> O'Reilly: U.S. should leave Iraq "as fast as humanly possible" because "there are so many nuts in the country"
<4> http://mediamatters.org/items/200602220007
<3> Iraq appears to be disintegrating.
<2> arca: so you are saying the private individual has the right to own those? i agree :-)
<3> The events of the past few days are scary.
<6> uae has been rather friendly to the west
<1> it is clear that he is talking about the war on terrorism
<4> "Bill O'Reilly suggested that the United States "hand over everything to the Iraqis as fast as humanly possible" because "[t]here are so many nuts in the country -- so many crazies -- that we can't control them." O'Reilly has previously called those advocating immediate withdrawal from Iraq "pinheads" and compared them to Hitler appeasers."
<0> e-hernick .. its very bad there
<6> never mind that they censor their citizens' web access
<1> Kaliuna: the chinese? yikes.. that is scary
<0> the left will cheer
<5> arcane - west cost
<1> Lupine: well as long as they arn't crazy, sure :)
<2> duke: notice the "as fast as humanly possible"
<6> uae has mega natural gas resources
<6> they are filthy rich
<7> dukes38 -- No one ever accused Bill of being consistent
<3> But you know what the WoT is? It's a Global Struggle against Extremism - not a war.
<1> please.. everybody and their mother has an f16
<2> UAE wishes to be the "gateway to the middle east".. hence why they have been buiding up THEIR ports, and wish to invest in OUR ports
<4> "here is the essential problem in Iraq. There are so many nuts in the country -- so many crazies -- that we can't control them. And I don't -- we're never gonna be able to control them. So the only solution to this is to hand over everything to the Iraqis as fast as humanly possible."
<2> UAE dreams that every product going from the middle east and to the US.. go thru their ports.
<8> the gateway to the ME...lol.....duck!!!!
<6> well maybe that's qatar
<2> CH: they showed the m***ive investment in their ports in the last ~5 years or so
<8> Lupine...think about that...could be some rough business
<6> but same diff
<8> next Lupine.,.they hire Russian Mob
<4> O'Reilly said this on Feb 20
<2> cry: they're also investing in EU and chinese ports
<9> Lupine: UAE is an ally ?
<6> why would uae not be an ally?
<8> when we have 'allies' like the UAE....watch back
<1> icmps: just because two of the hijackers are from uae...
<9> Evidently because they are muslims
<0> espectro it is an ally
<2> icmps: the UAE's reason for this is probably strictly $$$$ and finantial dominance over other nations in the middle east in "other than oil" industries
<6> the usa can put bases there
<1> icmps: does not necc. mean they are not allies
<10> The Italian women's ice skater is selling her outfit on e-Bay, we should pitch in and get it for TomM-.
<8> Espectro... arsonist/firefighter issues
<6> i bet
<0> to deny them simply on the basis of being muslim is racist
<2> btw: the UAE is one of the strongest allies the US has in the middle east.. of course, they have hence forth had very little media exposure of that
<11> Lupine will buy it for sniffing purposes ;)
<2> IMHO: the *REAL* harm here is.. how much exposure the UEA helping the US is getting.. :(
<0> TT the snowflake one?
<9> arc: I only said that because evidently they have alterior motives for this port deal (according to people in here) -- so, they seemingly couldnt be our ally as well
<2> occ: me? naw.. i prefer sushie.. not italian meatballs
<12> This SHOULD stink the American public not because of terrorism, but because of the Bush family's ties to the UAE.
<0> she skated pretty lousy imo .. I wouldn't buy it
<7> UEA has replaced Iran as our best ally in the ME
<10> CometBaby, yep
<6> it was some whammy or something
<2> FedUp: of course, all those deals under clinton were all angelic.. lol
<1> actually
<13> tweek, is rounds going to have the balls to sign the abortion bill?
<6> Slutskaya should have crushed the little american
<11> what sushi do jah like?
<9> The US GOVT isnt selling **** to anyone .. a UAE company is buying a british company that has already controlled/owned these ports ..
<1> our best ally in the ME is Israel
<9> Ugh.
<9> It changes very little
<2> occ: nice, fresh and bald ;-)
<9> If the british company doesnt ****ing outrage you, this shouldnt either.
<11> yo but the jews are too p***ive
<9> It'd be hypocritical any other way
<4> If Bill O'Reilly is saying that it's over for the US, that probably means it REALLY IS over. O'Reilly has a huge influence in the US media.
<14> yowz||: balls? I think it's more of a publicity stunt, to be honest.
<8> and they are also not to be trusted.....
<13> me too tweek
<8> Israel is a hostile friend...
<12> No of course not. Can't one be against Bush without being FOR Clinton?
<2> icmps: right.. but its just "another excuse"
<8> Arab countries are friendly enemies
<1> I wouldn't call them hostile....
<2> CH: lol.. as Reagan said "trust, but verify"
<15> israel is americas military base in the me
<6> only morons are against america
<10> dukes38, oh yeah, he rules alright.
<1> ebbtepid: no... that is iraq
<2> ebb: um.. wrong. the US has virtually no US ***ets in isreal
<14> dukes38: I wouldn't say 'huge influence'
<11> except for our citizenry
<11> and money
<8> Lupine ..in geopolitcs you have no friends or enemies..only friendly enemies and hostile friends
<9> Lupine: I personally think its a stupid idea to have a foreign country control our ports-- but I disagree with much of the rationale that has thus far been presented for such opposition by most people
<11> and milltary tech
<15> us pumps in tons of money into israel.. for what!
<2> the US placed SOME defensive ***ets there in desert storm
<15> cos israel shares the same interests as the US in the ME
<4> I believe that O'Reilly has the ability to get access to inside information
<9> Lupine: Which amounts primarily to "OMFG there muslims!! terrorists!!" which is just absolute horse ****
<8> icmps...administrate them...NOT own or Control them
<11> hah
<1> ebbtepid: actually.... the us pumps more money into arab countries....
<11> oreilly doesnt know ****
<2> icmps: yes/no. I think free capitalism is more important. but that's me
<0> FedUp .. well there are two sets of standards .. the left held one set of standards for clinton and another for bush. All those who come screaming in here self-righteously about Bush .. had their mouths zipped when clinton was pulling his ****.
<4> Bill O'Reilly - Good Morning America - 3-18-03 -- "And I said on my program, if -- if -- the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush administration again."
<9> Especially considering that UAE has been an ally of ours since 1971.
<14> he has the ability to drag people into his stupid show with more important things to do, then badger them...
<0> and so they will be reminded of it
<6> israel could have used some help as a startup country which evolved to have many serious enemies
<0> and of course NOW they want us to know that they really didn't approve of clinton, after all. LOL
<2> duke: and he wasn't clean
<8> CB..or praising Clinton
<6> back when created
<4> The Bill O'Reilly Iraq WMD Apology Countdown Clock: http://www.oreilly-****s.com/clock.htm
<7> dukes38 -- LOL
<6> arab countries surrounding israel seemingly automatically hated them
<12> CometBaby: I just don't buy this Fox News mentality that one can defend Bush by bashing Clinton. It changes the argument a la Karl Rove...
<0> leftists are in here everyday telling us that they didn't support what clinton did .. didn't like it .. never did. But they never spoke out against it until he was out of office.
<6> w/ no israeli transgressions
<8> dukes38...except that book from the Iraqi general saying the WMDs were airlifted inot Syria.....
<16> CometBaby, err that's wrong
<16> us leftist and liberals liked clinton
<0> FedUp I can understand why you do not want to draw any comparison .. after all .. clinton was sooooo corrupt.
<0> and the left wants to forget all that now
<0> don't point out history .. it's not important.
<8> What do Richard Milhous Nixon and William Jefferson Clinton have in common
<12> And of course Republicans are as up-in-arms about Bush's corruption as they were about Clinton's, too.
<9> Why does what Clinton did matter in the slightest? It certainly doesn't justify Bush doing similar things.
<5> Comet - sigh --
<16> well pointing out history 8 years ago...vs history being made now
<7> Bush is a significant failure, while Clinton is insignificant waste of talent
<16> big difference
<8> the word 'criminal' can be extracted from both names
<17> Mmm. Chocolate.
<0> suddenly .. they don't want to talk about clinton .. or be reminded of his ****.
<16> you can change decisions now, while you can't change history back then
<18> Hacker-Pschorr mmm
<12> The hypocrisy in politics cuts both ways, and there's simply no way to argue that one side or the other is worse.
<7> CometBaby -- You speak for the Democrats?
<9> FedUp: :thumsup:
<4> "Well, my analysis was wrong and I'm sorry.. I was wrong. I'm not pleased about it at all." As to the promise to "never trust the Bush administration again," he was considerably less forceful: "I am much more skeptical of the Bush administration now than I was at that time," he explained, before blaming CIA chief George Tenet for Bush's troubles.
<17> Hey, at least Bush hasn't incinerated any Branch Davidians lately.
<9> FedUp: Both sides ****. :)
<16> you're free to talk about clinton:) but us leftist and 60% of the country supported clinton when he left
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
,weed prons and cons.
#computers
ascii bunny face
CGEXF
nellie
#computers
#flash
Symantec System Center Console has detected that Symantec process tamper protect
#gentoo
#solaris
|
|