| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Comments:
<0> that was a product of them going to space
<1> i would rarther a world without terrorism or dry icecream
<2> i mean could you go out tomorrow and build a ship to the moon?
<0> but what do we gain from it?
<2> insomnia: scared the ruskies
<3> hmmm can you irc from the moon?
<2> made our penises look bigger
<0> lol hey pub
<0> i dont have a penis.
<1> what dopes the individual gain from it
<1> remember we is a product of collective ideology
<2> well the ones pushing for the moon landing did i think
<2> it was a pissing contest with the russians
<0> yes which is a ridiculous waste of money for both sides
<0> and time
<2> subjazz: what does the individual gain from a collective economy? imagine having to make every product yourself
<2> insmonia: we also learned how to piss in zero gravity
<2> and take showers
<0> hmm..so next time the earth has zero gravity we can thank the moon landing
<0> that'll be handy
<2> lol
<2> insomnia: landing ont he moon was just a human achievement. something to be proud of
<2> doesnt have to have a use
<0> what is the point of it if it doesnt
<4> where ya confuse yourself and lolol
<3> Publius
<4> just by thinking
<2> building skycrapers arent useful in their own right. you could make a bunch of smaller buildings. it would be easier
<3> did you take the jon in the campaign?
<2> the point is the challenge
<2> we put men on the moon. so impressive
<0> ryan, it would take up much more space..it is enviornmentally better
<4> which "job"?
<2> i mean imagine pulling out a scrap of paper and planning to send men to the moon and back
<3> the one with reed's opponent?
<1> being an individual is more challenging than being part of a collective
<2> thats a tremendous feat
<0> i agree sub
<0> takes balls :P
<2> subjazz: yeah it is
<4> it is with the governmenrs re-election campaign. It is a huge GGOP network
<2> but most people cant live up to that challenge and need others
<2> we need each other to live comfortably
<4> so I am on the Cagle youth part
<0> they're pussies
<1> definately, you have to overcome fear. the most dominant emotion
<0> survival of the fitest :P
<2> otherwise wed be running around hunting boars with spears or something
<0> ....
<3> Publius excellent
<2> i cant wait until we put men on mars
<0> and you do it with a big knife
<3> some of the best youth campaign people started at your age
<2> we're going to have that space cable thing too
<2> that will rule
<2> you hear of the space cable insomnia?
<4> Rebec: my best skill is that I **** up history really well...
<4> it's cool
<2> or the space elevator
<2> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_elevator
<2> we can send all our nuclear waste and sewage into outer space!
<1> collectivism is what has led to terrorism
<0> that's retarded
<2> and all the democrats! think of the possibilities!
<5> lets start with Ryan89
<0> lets just ruin another place with the **** we cant get rid of
<2> lithium: lol
<2> insomnia: space is big enough for our ****
<3> hi redrain
<4> Rebec: atm, I prefer sitting at home writing memos and fearning. I have met some cool people and should geet to work on important spots come septm.
<0> hmm i think that sending nuclear waste into space could back fire somehow..
<0> i dont know how, but i think it could
<2> id rather nuclear waste be in space than on our planet
<3> Publius that's important, study the youth for reagan campaign
<2> insomnia: the space elevator is safer than rocketing it to space
<4> our arch enemy
<0> what happens when we ruin earth and have to colonize space?
<1> as long as uyou put iot past the orbit its safe
<4> Newt has sided with us
<1> we wont be able to colonise space
<2> insomnia: id rather die
<4> to counter act the Reed gr***root movement with his own
<2> i dont want to live on the moon
<3> Publius :) youth campaigns win and lose elections
<0> THEN WHAT'S THE POINT
<1> you cant live on the moon
<4> we get to participate 100%
<4> it's awesome
<1> earth ios the only planet weve got
<0> pretty much
<2> insomnia: cause its cool
<0> but i dont like to completly write off the future
<3> subjazz maybe he's the man in the moon?
<2> you can send all the democrats to the moon
<3> and that was a joke
<3> don't get pissy
<2> who me?
<3> yeah
<2> i didnt say anything
<3> I thought you said the moon would be cool
<2> it would be
<3> so I said maybe you were the man in the moon
<2> i just wouldnt live there
<3> :)
<2> think how cool it would be to send shuttles into space without using huge *** rockets?
<1> suntzu said its not the amount of resources you have but what you do with them, its up to us to make this planet last as long as possible
<2> you can just send them up the elevator and they could use a lot less fuel that way
<2> and wouldnt have to risk reentry
<2> like the columbia
<2> With a space elevator, materials might be sent into orbit at a fraction of the current cost. Modern rocketry gives prices that are on the order of thousands of U.S. dollars per kilogram for transfer to low earth orbit, and roughly twenty thousand dollars per kilogram for transfer to geosynchronous orbit. For a space elevator, the price could be on the order of a few hundred dollars per kilogram, or possibly much less.
<6> ya otis space elevator
<2> thatd be insane
<2> stingray: i was just saying how we could use it to send all the democrats to the moon
<6> ryan hehehehe
<2> One potential problem with a space elevator would be the issue of ownership and control. Such an elevator would require significant investment (estimates start at about US$5 billion for a very primitive tether), and it could take at least a decade to recoup such expenses. At present, very few entities are able to spend in the space industry at that magnitude.
<0> have fun with the left over rednecks
<6> ya dem wars starring WD40 and opiewannadoobie
<2> $5 billion is a rounding error! build the damn thing!
<2> insomnia: fine send the nascar fans with them
<2> we spend 5 billion on bull****
<2> why not build an elevator to space
<4> ;(
<2> 5 billion is the average democrat pork barrel spending limit
<0> lol it's not the nascar fans you have to worry about, it's the ones marrying thier sister..i promise you they arent dems
<3> why the sad face?
<2> insomnia: they probably dont even vote
<0> pub hearts nascar
<2> lol
<2> how can you stand that ****? i never understood it
<6> brak trek go where no man has gone before bra date 36 24 36.9 while on the uss entercourse capt crotch yes ensign jackoff tampons of the prot side. quick put up the panty shields
<0> ryan, yes they do...they love bush...i live in hick ville usa
<3> pub's a sweetheart
<2> watching cars go around in a circle for 2 hours
<1> motor racing could only ever be appreciated by a conservative seeing as its uttyerly boring
<0> i just like to see them crash
<6> rebec heya
<2> insomnia: the democrats have some scummy voters too
<3> heya sting
<0> lol all us crack heads
<6> rebec got to get wife at airport at 11 am still aint slept
<2> insomnia: what could we do with the space elevator?
<6> brb
<2> we could sent a monkey up there just to see what would happen
<2> lol
<0> lots of things, that doesnt mean we should
<2> why not?
<5> I think to nascar fans, the sport is somewhat like the gladiators of roman times. They watch it for the thrill of seeing someone crash and possibly die
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#windows
#politics
#linux-noob
#stocks
#unixhelp
pfctl -s info Debug: urgent
web comcast
#netbsd
#unixhelp
#winxp
|
|