| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79
Comments:
<0> YOU HAVE SHOWN ZERO DATA!
<0> You just bring up **** about when you were on a race track.
<1> sintient: no, you test the drivers tomakes ure they are competent to drive. Of course, that would eliminate a huge percentage of drivers
<2> sintient, no caps
<0> He isn't listening.
<0> Ok, TheTailor you got it.
<1> yes I am. you just have a very simplified thou albiet niave view on it.
<0> I got your point.
<0> I realize you aren't into lowering deaths I got it.
<1> we havn't even gotten to design speeds for highways
<3> seagate and maxtor are merging?
<0> I got it lupine you want to go fast and race everyone understands your point of view.
<1> sintient: how would you correct a brake induced oversteer in a RWD vehicle?
<4> id wager most highways are designed for highway speeds
<4> i mean they groove the pavement and leave it, gaps in bridges, metal grates, road work
<5> I think there are some highways out west that are appropriate for higher speeds
<1> bmc: it's been a while.. but the original Eisenhower roadways for that era vehicles had a design speed of 85mph I believe.
<5> very flat
<0> let off steer into it
<4> obviously they arent designed for race track speeds
<4> Lupine maybe when they were first introduced
<1> sintient: you would have just ****ed yourself if you did that.
<6> Hello all - God Bless America, where I currently am
<4> things are quite different now
<0> OH NO!
<4> cars werent even safe to drive at 85mph
<5> Swigert, did you ever make it to Richmond?
<4> when did tires with appropriate speed rating come out?
<0> Correct put it into hover.
<1> sintient: the aboslutely wrong thing to do, and probably woudl have killed yourself. too bad, in real life, there is no "respawn"
<0> I don't race you fag.
<6> katey: not yet - Memorial Day weekend
<5> ah
<0> Stop trying to act like you race that means you know everything.
<1> sintient: brack induced oversteer means there is too little traction/weigh on the rear tires.. you need to GIVE it gas to correct.
<1> that has nothing to do with racing, but rather, knowing basic vehicle dynamics to be a safe driver.
<0> I said let off, I mean the brake of course.
<0> But whatever.
<3> i want to eat a 30 pound frog
<5> redfish, sounds filling
<6> lupine: did you bring a horse for me?
<6> redfish: don't exist
<0> I posted evidence that going faster than traffic keeps you a little safer I also posted evidence that lowering average speed lowers the accidennt rate.
<1> swigert: 320 ;-)
<0> That is what were talking about.
<5> redfish, will you prepare it in any special way?
<6> lupine: you brought 319 too many
<3> ill eat it live in one bite
<0> If everyone started going faster then everyone would have to go faster to keep ahead of traffic and then the average speed is raised and it is more dangerous for everyone.
<1> aside for left land bandits.. your speed rarely impacts the other persons speed
<4> everybody going the speed limit or within a safe range of it, is probably safest
<5> redfish, ok. take a picture of it before you eat it.
<4> thats why they have speed limits
<4> "how fast can i go"
<0> Everyone that played gran turismo knows you accelerate through turns.
<4> they tell you the safe speed
<4> for 'average conditions'
<3> katey whats your favorite type of lawn gr***
<1> bmc: speed limits != safe speed
<4> sometimes the safe speed will be less than the speed limit
<4> never over
<0> The evidence lupine says proves something is about average speed not about the limit.
<6> I had the pleasure to drive on WV's I-79 - 70mph
<5> redfish, monkey gr***
<0> But lowering the average speed helps everyone.
<7> going slower than 70 will cause an accident. dont try it.
<0> New Mexico has 85s I think.
<4> its 70mph on 81 also
<1> sin: well ****.. if everryone went .5mph, no one would be killed! [ except by old age ]
<4> once you cross the WV line
<0> There you go lupine we agree about that at least.
<5> redfish, actually, I think I re-seeded the yard with something called "tall fescue"
<0> I know it isn't practical but that is true.
<0> My town went speed hump crazy in the last 10 years.
<1> although, on a general rule.. look at the speed the cop drives when he's not racing with lights and sirens.. they know that most highways are safe to drive above the speed limit.
<0> There were no speed humps now they are everywhere.
<8> correcting over steer in a rear wheel drive, slow down without hitting the brakes
<4> creeping red fescue
<4> :P
<9> Justice Scalia Tells GOP Conservatives To Back Off: Court Is None Of Your Business...
<5> sintient, same thing happened in Takoma Park, MD when I lived there a few years ago
<1> rusty: the cl***ic Porsche 911.. when in doubt, plant the right foot to the floor :-)
<9> Scalia seemed to enjoy the irony, though, of chiding congressional conservatives, joking that "part of my charm is that I tell people what they don't want to hear."
<5> sintient, I always wanted to get some people to pose for a funny picture under one of those "speed hump" signs. :)
<0> There is evidence that people try to go around speed humps and then skyrocket the crash rate.
<8> haha, yeh, in a suv you just let off the gas straighten the wheel
<10> AAAman link>
<2> What's a speed 'hump'?
<1> AAAman: scalia should also scoald many of his fellow judges, for not doing the legislative's job
<5> hard to go around a speed hump if it crosses the entire width of the road
<0> Speed hump yeah , I was hoping pedestrians would get into the act too.
<9> Washington Post
<0> yeah you can't go around these humps, you can put one wheel in the gutter and one on the hump that is it.
<10> link?
<7> u need a language localizer, TheTailor
<9> Friday, May 19, 2006; A19
<8> the biggest mistake people make avoiding things is over steering, you are better off hitting it straight on
<10> AAAman the one you pasted from
<0> yeah both wheels at the same time.
<4> "The question whether the judges are invested with exclusive authority to decide on the constitutionality of a law has been heretofore a subject of consideration with me in the exercise of official duties. Certainly there is not a word in the Constitution which has given that power to them more than to the Executive or Legislative branches." --Thomas Jefferson to W. H. Torrance, 1815.
<1> rusty: you hvae to love the "oh no, there is a bird.. so i'm going to try to avoid it, by crashing into 5 other cars"
<0> if you angle you hit the bump 4 times.
<6> I want to drive like they did in Ronin
<5> heh. sounds like Scalia
<8> heh, witch jeeps, you take boulders and ditches one wheel at a time
<8> with
<9> bud -- the Url is the WashingtonPost.com
<4> i usually try to avoid birds
<8> fallen trees and stuff
<4> i wouldnt get into an accident trying to avoid them though
<9> bud -- today
<4> just pick it out of the grill
<6> I have a standard car, but on Wednesday I had to rent an automatic. It took some getting used to.
<8> you will end up with better traction and better clearance
<0> reaching for the tree isn't a habit I bet
<5> AAAman, he doesn't believe Scalia said it?
<8> hehe swigert always going for te shifter
<5> Scalia loves to piss people off. :)
<9> Katey -- He can believe what he wants
<8> and the clutch
<8> end up hitting the brake DOH!
<10> AAAman you pasted it from somewhere, what url?
<6> 426: the lack of a clutch was fun
<5> bud`, washington post
<8> hahaha
<6> 426: all of a sudden I had a free foot
<9> bud -- the Url is the WashingtonPost.com
<8> thats the one thing i hate about my jeep is no place to put your foot
<8> there is no dead pedal
<5> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/18/AR2006051801961.html
<10> AAAman that's not the url you pasted from. I want to see it in the context of the article you borrowed from.
<7> i remember clutches. those ****ed.
<5> Justice Antonin Scalia rebuked fellow conservatives on Capitol Hill yesterday, saying they have gone too far in trying to prevent the Supreme Court from using foreign law in its constitutional rulings.
<4> jeeps are too small
<5> wow. That took all of 30 seconds to find. :)
<8> if it wasn't for my knees being fugged up i would love a clutch
<1> ****.. it should be law, if any judge use foreign law in their rulings.. that any private citizen can put them out of their misery with a 230grain slug of lead.
<10> Katey do you mind?
<4> a suburban would be nice
<10> Katey i already had that one open
<4> or a blazer/tahoe
<11> a supreme court justice isn't paid to consider foreign law.. does the supreme court rule over treaties? If so than maybe a little bit of foreign law
<8> Lupine i saw Stevens and Scalia debate that once
<8> it was amazing
<5> bud`, then why were you asking for a link?
<4> Gujiri no, thats legislative authority
<8> Stevens was tottaly for it , Scalia against it
<8> the subtle insults were flying back and fourth
<8> hehehhe
<10> Katey well if it's your business, because I want to see it in the context of the page AAAman reads it from. now move along
<11> bmc, but treaty's can be brought before the courts in respect that a person can challenge an act of congress with respect to a treaty?
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#slackware
nimbot
#computers
#nhl
#windows
#politics
#cph
#sex
#stocks
#python
|
|