| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
Comments:
<0> you're just a dumb liberal, what makes you think you could understand science??
<1> can't help ya
<2> They interviewed great scientists that is.
<3> your access code?
<3> hahahaha
<1> cm: yes, access code.
<2> and its a more left of center source so it should have more credibility with some people than say Forbes Magazine ;)
<3> "i left my academic journal access code at work"
<3> heh
<1> cm_: is "access code" humorous to you ?
<1> cm: well, yes. I did.
<3> US_Male: what journal or journal database?
<4> international conference on emerging nuclear energy systems; 16-21 Jun 1991; Monterey, CA (United States); DOE Project
<1> cm: pretty much the majority of them
<5> My only complaint about SA is their general lack of citing primary documents.
<1> I cannot count them all
<3> atro: lemme pull it up
<3> US_Male: name 3
<1> cm: why ?
<6> FT: Do you think we'll exceed the psychological 70$/oil barrel mark this year ?
<1> cm: do you feel you are "quizzing" me ?
<0> Johan-: certainly
<7> let me pull it out....
<8> panininini
<9> we are over $70 already
<3> US_Male: no i just know that you are bull****ting
<1> cm_: your attitude tends ot make me want to not cooperate with your little child's game
<2> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/readings/french.html
<2> there is one source but there are a lot more at PBS since i last read it
<4> F Carminati et al - 1993 - CERN/AT/93-47 (ET),
<3> US_Male: because access to journals is prohibitively expensive unless you are an institution, in which case you dont need an access code
<6> tortis: Not its still 61$
<1> cm_: I can tell that you;re a clueless bull****ting dip**** from your attitude
<2> Frontline did a special maybe 5 or more years ago which was very good
<3> especially "pretty much all of them"
<3> hahaha
<3> dude
<3> youre so stupid
<1> cm: dumb***, I work for an isntitution
<6> panini I certainly hope so
<0> US-Male: I realizd that long ago
<2> now they look like more political articles.
<1> cm: you retarded ****face.
<3> US_Male: so why do you need an access code? it doesnt go off your web address?
<0> cm is retarded when it comes to any science topic
<2> I wish I could find the source on the scientists leading scientists in this field
<3> not web address
<3> and not ip
<3> i dont know the technical term
<1> cm: you ****ing moron, they use p***words. Aka access code
<6> cm: US Male is a scientist
<0> lol
<4> M Dawson, HP Furth, FH Tenney - Physical Review Letters, 1971
<3> US_Male: what institution?
<0> damn right you don't know the technical term
<4> cm: Do you want more citations?
<1> cm: I don't tell people where I work unless they are acting rationally
<1> people who know me, know where I work
<3> atro: lemme pull this up, i cant type and pull **** up simultaniously
<3> sec
<4> So stop tyling.
<0> astro: he doesn't want any citations. He wouldn't have a clue what to do with them anyway
<4> *typing
<3> im really curious about this but ant to be informed
<4> cm: These citations are not... "Light Reading" for background.
<4> They're, "How To Do This" and "What happens", in very technical terms. :P
<0> I thought US-Male worked as a male escort...
<4> BL Cohen, HW Lewis - American Journal of Physics, 1984
<3> Astrodog: whats the title of the last one?
<4> cm: You don't need the title, to find it.
<1> hah
<3> i do
<8> did anyone inform the channel that panini is a crazy man
<3> ahh
<6> Now gold is at 555$/oz...
<3> ok
<3> sec
<4> You want these citations in APA?
<4> :P
<0> Johan-: gold has plateaued for a bit... eventually it will exceed 800-1000
<2> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/04/020426073537.htm
<2> Well there are a couple sources randomly chosen for information. Im trying to find the newest plant information it may in my cites it may not be
<2> Emerging, third generation reactors are equipped with advanced features, such as safety systems incorporating p***ive energy dissipation or natural processes, simplifying their design and allowing them to cope with malfunctions without the need for operator action.
<4> S David, A Billebaud, ME Brandan, R Brissot, et al. - Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 2000
<6> panini: I'm counting on it...I took a huge risk on gold and oil shares and its finally paying off big time
<0> but i would recommend the sci am dec 2005 issue as a good starting point for anyone who wants to be *informed* about this topic
<1> what kind of citations were you guys looking for anyway
<0> Johan-: me too
<0> Johan-: but it's a pretty safe bet
<8> panini
<6> smart man, panini
<4> US_Male: If peer reviewed citations don't cut it... he can just get ****ed.
<4> :P
<1> hahah
<6> panini: When did you get in ?
<1> 'zackly
<8> who is zack
<2> Generation IV machines now in development, says Gail Marcus of the Department of Energy, will provide dramatic improvements in reactor design. "They're going to mean significant improvements in economics of their performance, in safety, and in waste minimization," Marcus explains, as well as being more resistant to attempts to divert mateial for illegal weapons manufacturing.
<10> so
<1> zack Lee
<10> ive pulled up BL Cohen, HW Lewis - American Journal of Physics, 1984
<11> i'm taking the oreck challenge
<10> and its a book review
<0> Johan-: i got in early... around 400
<2> Some advanced design concepts include high temperature reactors that are 2-3 times more efficient than contemporary reactors, mechanically simpler machines with fewer moving parts for improved reliability, and nuclear plants that would process their own waste.
<4> cm: Have you conisdered, that authors might have submitted multiple things, to the journal?
<2> Thats what I was referring to earlier
<12> concepts
<12> dummy
<4> You've got 12 months to dig through, and since its that journal, 2 volumes per month.
<12> thats what i was refering to earlier
<2> This recycled radioactive material
<6> panini: Did you take it out during the correction ?
<12> conceptual doesnt mean realistic in practice
<0> Johan-: no, because it's too hard to time those correctly
<2> 3rd generation or in place working
<4> cm: You've been given 7 peer reviewed sources, thus far. Drop it.
<12> Astrodog: so give me the citation of the article
<1> gimme gimme gimme
<1> jesus
<12> hahah
<2> 4th generation is the one which is even more efficient than the newer onces already are, and less easily used for nuclear bombs
<0> lol
<4> I did. I've given you 7 goddamn peer reviewed journal cites.
<12> you are the most pathetic bunch of right wingers
<4> What more do you want?
<1> can't anyone do their own research ?
<12> Astrodog: my connection died, i saw two
<0> typical liberal retard
<12> US_Male: the info doesnt exist, so no i cant
<13> Astrodog a rightwinger? :)
<1> I think it's obvious that cm is a ****smoking liar
<13> hahaha
<4> cm: Then I guess you can learn how to do research. Enjoy. :)
<0> US-Male: yes, that's obvious
<1> Astrodog you rightwinger !
<4> Since I found each of those cites, on the fly.
<2> Anyway in my opinion our nations should be building about 50 nuclear plants night and day construction..
<12> Astrodog: ill just get my info from magazines like you fellas
<2> Hey Comet!
<13> hi FreeTrade :)
<2> we should be doing it yesteday
<4> US_Male: ***ociation with republicans.... it burns! IT BURNS!
<13> we are both up way too late ;)
<1> hahaha
<13> almost 2 am here
<0> FT: yes
<2> The Columbia river can easily take at least 6 more plants to add to the 3 it already has
<2> and actually could do more then that
<1> FT yes, we need a good solid 50 more
<1> to start with
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
DALNET THIRTYSOMETHING
fglrx antialiasing
porn and saint jock
Nancy Polesi
#heroin
#3dsmax
#narcotics
#politics
#opengl
sound like evanescence
|
|