| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Comments:
<0> i am al quaeda? wtf?
<1> ban zakkari
<1> he is terror
<0> what kind of maniac says that kind of ****
<0> he is terror yea
<1> zakkari is a devil
<0> like wtf?
<2> Zarqawi??
<0> it doesn't even make sense it just sounds like Hunter S. Thompson insane
<3> someone called you a terrorist?
<0> no i am repeating it - suna
<4> hi Arieal. it's our btcentralplus muslim/jew/chinese
<1> hi bud`
<2> where is it..is it in channel??
<5> bbl smokie
<6> 11:07:11 19/02/2006 LOG
<0> are chinamen allowed to be on IRC?
<1> yes
<1> looool
<4> haha
<7> hateuform: no because most pol, but no real service to the country.iticans are dopes or crooked, supporting the companies because they provide taxes.
<0> oh i thought maybe the gov would forbid it
<4> can tell its him even before looking up the ip
<0> i could be plotting to insight a revolution with a chinaman
<0> just because we're on IRC and it's instant exchange
<0> i should tell the chinese authorities about this threat
<0> plug the hole ya know
<2> amazing...
<2> do a /who *btcentral*
<6> Whats up folks.
<2> nothing but bots and their runners
<6> What ?
<2> the becentralplus domain...
<2> btcentral
<0> what is it
<0> !google btcentralplus
<4> surprised it inst ****ted. btcentral is only trouble, like that guy ^
<2> its a pesthole domain
<2> thank you FT
<7> hateuform: No because most policiticans are dopes or crooked, supporting Apple and $M because they provide taxes. They should be supporting companies that provide services.
<2> oops
<2> needs to be btcentralplus
<2> as in btcentralplus.com
<0> the capabilities and possibilities with MS and Apple systems far exceed NIX systems
<6> ackl
<2> that will stop them from joining
<8> hate: Uh.
<0> wtf is it? google doesn't know :-/
<8> You know Apple IS a nix system, right?
<2> hateuform :)
<0> linux that is :-/
<8> Its not Linux.
<8> Its Darwin.... Mach on FreeBSD, basically.
<0> well that's not persuant to the point
<8> Yes, it is.
<8> Apple IS a nix system.
<0> i dont care
<6> Apple isnt a nix system because almost noone used it as one, it does have a unix type command line as of OSX. People still use the traditional mac GUI which I presume has its own operating system.
<8> Free: No.
<9> hate - MacOSX is not a Linux variant, geez
<8> OSX Is Unix.
<0> i didn't say it was retard
<0> wtf is a geez anyway
<10> OSX is FBSD based.
<9> hateuform - Um, yes, scroll back my loopy friend
<6> How did they make all MAC programs backward compatible
<8> Its Darwin, to be specific. A Mach kernel, on what ammounts to a FreeBSD "world", with a kernel loadable for the GUI.
<10> FreeTrade, by making an emulator.
<8> Free: The same way FreeBSD is compatibile with all Linux apps.
<10> It's the same way I can run windows programs on Linux.
<0> BoogyMan - you misread my correction
<9> FreeTrade - They didn't, they included a subsystem called cl***ic that allows for *SOME* pre OSX packages to run
<6> Well It wouldnt of made much difference in sales if it had added the unix element or not in my opinion.
<8> Free: It would have had no effect.
<8> But they didn't "Add" the Unix element.
<9> FreeTrade - It IS a *nix system
<8> OSX is based on nix.
<8> There's no kernel, and no base operating system, without it.
<6> There sales are driven by their repackaged image, the success of the iMAC which saved the business and now thier MP3 player.
<3> first osx was based on darwin...isn't it based on fbsd now?
<3> or still darwin?
<2> boogyman...alas....too little too late
<0> freetrade is the best at turning the direction of the conversation
<11> Darwin is based on fbsd
<3> oh, well, poo
<2> maybe Apples will be absorbed by *nix lol
<8> suna: Darwin is, basically, a FreeBSD world, runninng on a Mach kernel.
<9> CryHavoc - Not sure, if they can lower the price point with the Intel Mac things could change
<3> ah
<2> they can improve X
<3> some website i read was like
<6> As a unix administrator in my past, not that great a one but one nonetheless, I cant see booting a $2500.00 box to run vi
<2> wont happen boogyman...
<3> "this version basd on darwin, this ersion based on fbsd"
<3> and i'm like eh....
<4> Mac managed to pull off what many wish they could do with marketing. they've developed a cult like following. VW is another company
<9> CryHavoc - I am not so sure, will watch and see
<8> Free: Why the people use it is irrelevent.
<8> Its nix, that allows it all to work.
<2> all that saved Apple is the Ipod...
<3> I never ran bsd for more than like 2 days, because I wasn't one of these hax0r kids in denial
<6> Bud, Apple/MAC has always had a cult like following.
<3> I don't have any use for a secure server os
<2> and guess what..more windows users buy them than mac users...go figure
<3> and niether do 99% of people who run it!
<3> :)
<0> linux has a snobby cult following too
<8> suna: FreeBSD isn't for hax0r kids in the denial. ;)
<2> even in software...Apples are suffering..
<3> agreed
<12> bud: Even the more devoted VW followers I know are becoming disgusted with the way the company's going lately, quality-wise.
<8> Why do you think Yahoo, Microsoft, etc, use it?
<4> FreeTrade i saw a documentary about companies that do that, like VW. they win over customers for life with very specific marketing campaigns
<8> :P
<2> numerous Acrobat 7 features are for Windows only
<6> OS's have a lot to do with loyalty more to do with familiarity and some to do with politics.
<2> like the form maker
<3> linux's snobby cult following is nowhere near as bad as bsd's...cept maybe in the case of debian users
<8> Cry: wine > Windows.
<8> ;)
<2> not just loyalty FT....
<9> OS selection is almost like a religious choice with some
<6> Familiarity is the major cause for purchasing an OS.
<8> suna: That's because BSD isn't ****. Linux has some.... issues.
<8> ;)
<0> i had an OS identity crisis a few years ago
<3> bsd is the home of "everyone is a moron except for me! what? you don't know how to recompile a fbsd kernel? you're a chemist? I DON'T CARE! YOU'RE A MORON!"
<0> but i dont give a **** anymore so
<2> MS took a gamble...and it paid off in the form of m*** saturation and low prices
<6> The people who hang out here are not a representative sample of america, We have a lot more nerds than exist in the general population.
<8> suna: No one beats OpenBSD for "Snobby cult following".
<3> :)
<11> Astrodog: Hah. Yep
<2> I readily agree that Windows has its own set of problems...
<9> Suna - Feel better now? LOL
<0> FreeTrade: hahaha
<8> suna: If you can't read a manual, you shouldn't be using electronics.
<6> Most computer users still done even know what Linus is, A OS i have used for 10 years and Used Sun Solaris before that.
<8> :P
<2> but nothing I myself can not repair
<6> But not as a home box, or main box.
<3> I swear to god i've seen on two separate occasions fbsd nerds use the argument "do you think bush could recompile a bsd kernel?" to try to show that he's stupid
<2> FT...true..I have had Linux boxes before
<8> suna: What?
<8> That's silly.
<2> can't beat them for some tasks
<3> not just silly, RETARDED
<3> :)
<8> Even Bush could recompile a FreeBSD kernel.
<0> i bet you he can't
<6> I always used windows because they were less expensive than mac and you had more choices of 3rd party devices and software.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
segoi hockey
#solaris
#3dsmax
#linux-noob
#beginner
#windowsxp
#mirc
#politics
#delphi
#flash
|
|