| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
Comments:
<0> hahah only in your mind Glock
<1> Salvery was the biggest mistake this country ever made.
<1> Slavery that is
<0> Glock, i wonder how many of those 10 million end up with guns in the USA
<2> I have full confidence that the courts would back my interpretation over yours.
<0> committing crimes
<2> So I ain't worried.
<1> But we have come along ways from it.
<1> SO its something to be proud of too.
<0> carrying out "large scale injurious or hamful acts"
<1> I would love to see this court reinforce the right to keep and bear arms.
<0> in my mind the states of The south west should be using their own resources to conquer the border problem
<0> in a JOINT effort
<0> with the fed
<0> its like asking the entire federal government to save idiots from katrina
<1> IF you banned all guns within 10,000 feet of a school you would ban most guns in the nation.
<1> A mikle is 5000and some odd feet.
<1> mile
<2> It's a difference in interpretation that cannot be resolved... you feel the broad meaning of invasion should be used, I feel the specific usage for military incursions was specifically implied.
<0> you can't condemn the state of Louisiana while you bitch about the border problems in the south west
<0> the governors of the south west should be putting national guard on their borders
<0> its taht simple
<3> glock: by the same tolken, I have no qualms if the local states used their own resources to secure their own state boarders
<0> listen NY doesn't border freakin mexico
<3> rusty: I agree, they should use their own states guard/reserves
<0> why should i have to pay for THEIR ****?
<2> Lupine... either do I.
<2> Lupine... if nothing else, for the sake of maintaining order.
<0> heh
<0> so i geuss i am "right" after all
<2> But to imply that the immigration problem is an invasion as used in the Constitution would authorize the States to wage war on mexico, which is absurd.
<0> hahahah
<0> never mind
<0> first you argued with me that there was no such clause
<0> then when you found the clause you try to redefine the word "invasion"
<2> I challenged you to find it.
<2> The clauses you were using were strictly on federal powers.
<0> yeh oh my dog I didn't find it as fast as you did!
<2> ;)
<0> GOD for give me
<0> OHhhh master GLock
<2> :D
<2> Someday I'll be the Constitution Master... but not today.
<0> the clauses i was using was LIMITING federal powers
<0> =)
<2> Well the clause from Article I was an empowerment clause for the feds... so no.
<0> i never said anything about article one
<2> And the Article IV section that was relevant also put a power squarely in federal hands.
<0> i said article IV
<4> http://www.break.com/index/stolenlaptop.html
<2> The Article I, Section 10 clause is the only one that worked for you, and that's only if immigration could be viewed as a justification for Arizona to invade Mexico.
<0> The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; <--- actually Article IV is very VERY relevant
<0> but i understand you problem with defining words and sentences with that "invasion" problem
<1> Abusive Domain or User
<2> heh
<2> You are the astrodog of the right.
<2> :D
<2> brb... need to call this yahoo and let him know his laptop will cost a thousand bucks to fix, mostly parts.
<0> hahah
<0> all i am saying is its typical of the states to rely on the federal government to secure the borders while THEY themselves could do it
<0> i mean seriously
<5> cool, 16 more catoon rioters dead
<0> the 3 states that i am talking about make more money combined than NY
<0> 4 states
<0> they are the biggest whiners
<0> out of 50 states
<0> 4 of them whine the most about hte border
<0> so why not those 4 states form a coalition and stop immigrants through their own measures
<0> instead of acting and using it as a political tool
<2> Poor guy... could hear his little geeky heart crush over the phone.
<6> stupid professor, he shouldn't carry around a laptop with data that important on it
<6> he gets at least 1/3 of the blame, but the kid definately gets the rest
<5> wait...
<5> military coup in philippines??
<2> Haven't they been having a military coup since the 19th century?
<0> ehhhhhhhhhhh
<0> not really
<0> they were a colony of the USA
<0> we left
<0> we installed democracy
<2> They were fighting us while we were there.
<4> http://www.honda.co.uk/civic/?campaignid=CM038200W01D&advertiserid=ema
<2> And fighting each other after we left.
<0> muslims have been fighting everything
<7> cartoon wars
<0> its the typical "mudslime" on the borders war
<7> I bet an immature 10 year old has more self-control
<0> if you look through out hte world islam is causing conflict on all of its borders
<7> they'd never survive american high school
<0> its the MO of Islam
<2> Moneyball... I take offense to that as an American.
<0> they use every oppurtunity to spread their ****
<2> Boston Tea Party, baby!
<0> and the majority of their **** is 3rd world mystical beliefs
<7> you are telling me that somebody who gets that pissed off because of a cartoon would last one month in a high school?
<0> those that haven't had the oppurtunity to experience technology and such, are the ones who are easiest to influence
<7> if they only made fun of my God I'd consider myself lucky after watching what alot of kids went through
<0> and they are the ones who are in the balance
<2> I spent most of my high school days pissed off... and I graduated.
<2> :D
<5> yesterday i stated the cartoon riots would not end. i was right: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060218/wl_afp/europemediaislam_060218214935
<7> one kid in math cl*** got pushed so far he blew his head off
<0> I wished i would have graduated
<7> Devry for you
<0> but i am glad that i know the things i know now
<0> i can read
<0> but i can't do math that well
<7> do you understandify mathamamatics?
<8> I understandify it!
<7> thats an untruthitude
<0> hehehe can you write a formula explaining the Magical theory of everything?
<0> or M Theory?
<7> the business ethics cl***es at college can be PC liberal bs at times
<5> yes
<0> or how about the chaotics in astronomical equates?
<9> Dilbert is covering the Land of Unrealistic Business ***umptions
<7> like how a company has an ethical obligation when some retard does something like eat the spray paint you sold them
<0> heh
<0> thats that guys stupidity
<7> my professor got mad when some guy said the world was better off for it
<9> warning: this paint is for external use only ... not to be taken internally
<8> academia is liberal biased way more often than conservative bias, however it's very easy to see and (dispite waht your average conservative wants you to believe) it hardly exists outside of liberal arts courses
<0> i would clothes line your professor and blame him for not knowing Akido
<7> my MIS professor is really conservative
<0> "it was his fault!"
<8> and in any case, one who would avoid college simply because they don't like the political orientation of instructers is almost as pathetic as someone getting pissed off over a cartoon.\
<8> and on top of it
<7> but he hates big business
<8> those who are that edgy usually have serious doubts about their own beliefs
<0> MOney i would drop his cl***
<9> fault is a slippery notion depending on court case precedents
<7> hes funny as hell though
<0> if it was mandatory i would find another teacher
<0> you can do that yah know=)
<8> those who will just randomly bring up politics when it's unwarranted, or who will try to relate everything in life to liberalism....most of them I find have very serious doubts about their views. If they were secure, they wouldn't feel the need to rub in in our faces all the time as if they were tyring to prove something
<7> he showed me how to get a company to pay for you to take their product
<0> MOney, you can reasonably buy the rights to a drug
<0> say a weight loss drug
<0> its been approved by the FDA but the drug company loses the patent
<7> one company ran a promo to hurt another rival company that was offering a rebate
<0> you can re patent it
<0> and make SCADS of money
<0> you can take government grants in the MILLIONS
<0> i don't know how it works exactly yet i am looking into it
<0> like Viagra?
<9> it doesn't seem to be based on the traditional "reasonal person" criterion
<0> its a drug that was discovered to work in lowering cholesterol
<0> years later it was realised it gets "men up"
<0> so they repatented it as a ***ual stimulai
<0> **** like that happens ALL the time
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
fidele kato pink panther
#politics
#winxp
slackware 64
#beginner
#rhino3d
#computers
#gamedev
wine warcraft 2 ipx
step by step cedega coh
|
|