| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
Comments:
<0> The same stuff from the same people.
<1> Calidank, is that another liberal trick? Just don't answer the question?
<2> 7 deadly sins, 7 ways to win, 7 holy paths to hell and your trip begins
<3> tailor what was the question
<4> http://img133.imagevenue.com/initial/loc24/bf52f_787491.jpg
<3> tailor i told you already im playin poker
<3> if you have a important question msg me
<2> gotta love Iron Maiden
<5> ang your head
<5> err bang
<6> calidank - you afraid to answer questions posted to you in here, you are posting in here - answer TT's questions
<2> Bang your head! metal health will drive you mad!
<2> =)
<7> Kaliuna: calidank has all the answers to every question. He just doesn't know which answers go with which question ;=)
<1> Calidank, no no! Please! Play poker!
<5> hahahahahaa
<6> ++C -- hi - yup we've noticed --
<2> yeh but you can't beat "LIKE a Rainbow in the dark!"
<8> "I do not see a likelihood of a filibuster," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "This might be a man I disagree with, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the court." She said she will not vote to confirm the appeals court judge, based on his conservative record.
<0> Some people do the same thing everytime instead of siting examples or aggreeing to disagree they just lash out.
<8> LOL
<3> kaliuna are you that slow....im playing poker...you guys type so fast i cant possibly see every question
<0> The thing you can do in here is remember who it is an ignore the ones that do it everytime.
<8> He should be on the court... but she'll not vote for him.
<3> if you want a answer msg me
<3> im more than willing to answer any question
<8> It's like impeachment: The Democrats all thought Clinton was guilty---but voted Not Guilty.
<6> Calidank -- you have time to POST crap in here - you have time to answer questions put forth -- or leave --
<8> Kal LOL
<3> im not posting crap kaliuna
<7> DStewart: Maybe she meant: He will be on the vote. But she will not court him.
<3> i havent posted anything in like 10mins
<3> im just responding to you and others
<3> dont lie
<6> DS -- am tired of his crap!
<9> Calidank: actually, that's all you do when you post :)
<8> Man, I'm getting hungry...
<0> Lieing to a grand jury is a pretty bad deal.
<10> Why would the dem's block Alito? the guy is for expanding federal powers not explicit in the constitution, dems love Alito.
<6> Calidank -- ya you have failed to answer DS's questions, you have failed to answer TT's questions
<3> roflmao
<3> and youve failed to read
<0> Breaking constituional rights is a pretty big deal.
<11> The answer to the most important question of all is: I need a shower.
<2> its a test
<7> sintient: so who lied to a grand jury (lately?)
<10> Alito = Democrat Wet dreams sans abortion issue.
<6> lol -- I have YET to see an answer posted...
<8> Calidank, I don't know whether she's failed to read or not, but you certainly haven't addressed any questions.
<3> dstweart
<3> ill say it real big so you can see
<2> i have yet to see a question posted that wasn't answered by the posse
<8> Your perfect right, but that's the case.
<12> I'm supprised we are not talking about MLK day on this great holliday
<2> heh
<0> Really when people have to bring up stupid things other presidents have done to defend the current one I know they are reaching.
<3> IM PLAYING POKER I CANT READ EVERY LINE...IF YOU WANT AN ANSWER THEN MSG ME AND I WILL ANSWER EVERY QUESTION
<3> ONCE AGAIN
<3> IM PLAYING POKER I CANT READ EVERY LINE...IF YOU WANT AN ANSWER THEN MSG ME AND I WILL ANSWER EVERY QUESTION
<11> we already did
<2> Cali, relax
<13> Why is it that, around here, whenever a guy finds himself with multiple people unable to understand what the **** he's talking about, it's all their ignorance, not his fuzzy thinking, to blame.
<0> Calidannk they are just messing with you.
<2> you are getting dog piled
<3> will **** hemi i gotta say it like 10 times for them to understand
<8> Nope. This is a public channel. Why should I /msg you?
<5> perhaps the confirmation of alito will result in less emininent domain abuse
<8> if I got online to go private with someone, I wouldn't come into the channel
<3> well then dont bitch about not getting a answer to questions i dont see
<0> They just want to leave it that you avoid questions, it is a tactic to discredit you.
<2> Cali walk away
<3> true sintient
<3> its sad
<9> Pickle: because arrogant fools such as Calidank "think" (and I do use that term loosely) of themselves as "geniuses" ;)
<2> otherwise they will call you a drunk or something=)
<13> Like last night, when I reject some ridiculous, convoluted theory about Chappaquid****, it was my not listening that was the reason why the theory made no sense at all.
<7> Calidank: are you winning?
<0> These two are notoriously full of it.
<11> yes. To discredit another IRCer.
<10> ywc: less eminient domain abuse could just as easily be handled at the State level.
<3> plusplusc yeah im up a little
<10> ywc: not everything needs to be a federal issue.
<14> "primera cosa, vamos a matar todos los abogados"
<8> I'm not messing with him. I'm pointing out that Kal is right. Calidank makes dozens of posts, then when asked a question, doesn't answer it.
<12> hey lets all relax its I Have A Dream Day
<6> sintient -- tt has asked repeatedly, so has DS -- and he ignored them not just once or twice... several times...
<3> well then dont bitch about not getting a answer to questions i dont see
<8> Instead, he says, "Hey, I couldn't have seen it. I was playing poker."
<3> well then dont bitch about not getting a answer to questions i dont see
<9> wheeee!
<0> Calidank jeez you let them win.
<13> And stay that way, ***hole.
<10> gee.. didn't see that one coming..
<9> Calidank: thanks, bitch, for getting yourself devoiced! ;)
<6> Pickle -- :)
<0> What question?
<15> change your nick to get +v again
<5> i agree ... states rights are more important
<7> DStewart: at least Calidank isn't trying to play with your poker.
<0> How does calling someone an ignoramus have anyting do it?
<9> and with that, I'm ready to goto bed...on a good note! ;)
<8> ++c, yes, at least...
<15> night IamKing
<0> That is a retarded question, why should he educate them on how to ddebate.
<6> sintient -- the logs will show it if you can't scroll back far enough to read
<16> asm
<9> JanetB: night!
<6> IamKing -- heheh nite nite
<0> I did scroll.
<0> I saw a question about calling someone ignorant.
<0> What question are you refereing to.
<8> Now Calidank is msging me. Criminy.
<6> sintient -- then you missed it -- probably further back -- but we ALL say same thing -- WE know what he failed to answer --
<0> What?
<0> Ask it again.
<8> I suppose it's my fault he got devoiced.
<12> adios King
<0> I want to see what kinda question has all of you so riled up about.
<10> sintient: im curious too..
<0> What you have to have some guy answer for you to right in the world?
<8> Here's one question I asked:
<6> sintient - if you weren't here - too bad... DS, TT and I all asked and he didn't answer...
<8> Suppose the NSA program did not exist. Would you then think that, because that illegal program to intercept foreign calls into the US doesn't exist, therefore the NSA couldn't be doing illegal interceptions among two domestic US parties?
<17> Dstewart: those that get butthurt often whine the most :)
<0> Maybe it got lost in your mobbing of him.
<8> butthurt??
<11> the question was, and I quote: "fuzzy wuzzy was a bear, fuzzy wuzzy had no hair. Fuzzy wuzzy wasn't fuzzy, was he"?
<0> DS that question is impossoble.
<0> If the NSA didn't exist they can't do anything illegal.
<5> hahahaha
<10> DS: that question makes my head hurt.
<0> Yeah really that is a conveluted piece of trash.
<0> Try again.
<0> I blame no one for not answering that.
<4> sint: Yeah.... I agree.
<4> To quote an attorney.
<11> Jeesus.
<0> I read it three times and I still don't get it.
<12> double negative?
<11> That question is easy to answer....
<4> "Objection your honor... that question should be taken out and shot."
<0> haha
<17> Well either the NSA exists... or it doesn't. you can't have it both ways, and expect a Serious Answer.
<0> Objected CONJECTure.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
wifey sissy
portsnap fetch key firewall
#computers
#beginner
glibc-2.4-r3 failed
6600OC BFG
#politics
#unixhelp
#beginner
#nintendo
|
|
