| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Comments:
<0> up to 25 an hour
<0> after three months
<1> I picked up my board chip and ram today
<0> but it union controlled
<1> 600$ later
<0> what if I don't choose to pay union fee
<2> gpoo: well.. take advantage of the union.. slack off, do sloppy work.. oh and dont bathe
<3> you don't get to keep the job
<0> Lupine :_
<2> rond: yea, that is one thing that I think needs to change.
<4> Lord Browne, the chief executive of oil firm BP, has said he expects crude prices to fall from current near-record levels as more supplies are discovered.
<4> However Lord Browne, speaking in an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel, said there was not likely to be any dip in prices in the short term.
<4> He said prices will probably settle at an average of about $40 a barrel in the medium term, before falling lower.
<2> especially since union dues go to political groups
<3> One of the reasons I left the east coast in the early 80's
<0> I am in the east cost
<3> only time I have ever been part of a union
<0> east coast is big on unions
<0> fees
<0> well
<0> I don't care
<0> i just need the money
<0> I am a college student
<0> I don't ask the gov to give me ****
<5> not even a Pell Grant?
<4> "We cannot really count on oil prices easing very much in the near future," Lord Browne told Der Spiegel in an interview due to be published on Monday.
<4> "But is very likely that oil prices will range in the medium term around an average of $40," he continued. "In the long run it could even be $25 to $30."
<0> hmm
<0> I will pay them back
<0> when I get my job
<6> uh huh. :)
<0> my sister is getting raped with student loans
<0> but she a pharmacy md
<0> my school is cheaper
<0> :)
<4> Lord Browne said that companies were finding large oil deposits in the Caspian Sea, while there was good production potential in countries such as Russia and regions including Western Africa.
<0> hers is 30 k
<0> and know phd program is higher
<7> by 70$ corn oil start to be interesting... by 100$ a baril.. corn oil.. is the way to go..
<0> she get hardly any grants
<0> or none
<0> my sister is social consertive
<0> but if some handed her money, for doing nothing
<0> I think she would take it
<0> if it where not illegal money
<1> the biggest scam is 'student union'
<0> Herzen oh college "student unions"
<0> yes
<0> I never pay atteion to them
<1> at the university where i work you are automatically part of the student union and fees are automatically deducted for them
<1> then they take the fees and put up leftwing political propaganda and make donations to the leftwing party
<0> Herzen oh you mean
<0> oh shoot
<0> Herzen wtf, what if you don't choose
<8> http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002689006
<0> oh the same student fees that pay for left wing speakers
<2> yep.. to me, forcing someone to donate money to political groups.. is a violation of political freedom
<6> Herz: that's.. disgusting
<0> Lupine my nephew who works for verizon
<2> Timur: but common on many campuses in my experience
<0> told them I am sorry
<6> absolutely, esp if you don't have a choice as to which group(s) receive it as a donor
<0> but I voted for bush
<7> gpoo, do you think bush will ever testimony.. in court.. about what lead to the war ?
<0> they got angry
<4> "It's very sad. But our House Democratic Caucus is determined to uphold a high ethical standard. We said it, and now we are doing it," Pelosi said after the vote. <-- hahahah yes its very sad to uphold ETHICS
<0> they like so it was you who elected bush
<0> he was like I vote who I want in office
<6> Lup: eh.. well, if it's like 'the national ***'n of teaching ***istants', that's obviously normal and probably smart for TAs
<0> he don't relay on his verizon job
<0> he owns buldings
<0> aparments, but verzion is extra income
<6> but if it's like.. the ACLU, PETA, or whatever.. then not
<0> Lupine but still for a student it good pay
<2> timur: well, students shouldn't be forced to support TA's
<0> at least to pay for my insurance
<0> yea
<0> the caclus 2 cl*** in the moring cl***
<2> gpoo: sometimes you have to do what you have to do.
<0> has a ta teaching it
<0> in the morning
<1> Timur, they send out emails signed 'in solidarity' etc
<1> its pretty annoying
<0> Herzen I always getting spam with emails
<2> I was in the SGA, not because I gave a flip about anything.. other than looking good on the resume ;-)
<6> well, the students pay tuition, and the tuition used for things that provide for things like teacher and TA salaries.
<0> but my school is a engiree
<6> that's kinda normal
<7> gpoo, do you think bush will ever testimony.. in court.. about what lead to the war, fake WMD proof, is only interest in iraq before 9/11 ?
<0> so most speakers not poltical
<0> but
<0> some times it is
<6> Herz: how subtle of them
<0> they senator bob mendez
<0> the cuban democart
<0> dirtbag
<0> err
<2> timur: oh, I thought you were talking about action committee's, etc
<0> but he is a dirtbag in my opnion
<0> come and speak of projects for nj
<0> my engigree school does nothing
<6> Lup: no, salaries and perhaps to some extent advocacy
<0> for NJ
<0> in projects
<2> pmo: only if he gets to call Ted kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Chiraq, Putin, etc.
<8> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/15/AR2006061501267.html
<0> pmo did you read un 1441
<7> gpoo, not specifically, why ?
<7> gpoo, don't you think US people and allies. don't deserve to see mister bush in court.. and explain publicly what happened ?
<6> nope
<6> no more than FDR was 'taken to court' for fighting the Nazis.
<2> pmo: i would rather see those who said one thing, and voted the other way in court
<7> Lupine, i'd better see people in charge.. at least they are usually supposed.. for obvious reason to know better than others..
<4> if Bush goes to court then so goes Hillary, Nancy Pelosi, Carl Levin, Robert Byrd, Al Gore, Bill Clinton
<2> pmo: i agree. and in the US, it is the senators who declare war. not the president.
<7> RustyFord, why should they ?
<4> "He will use those weapons of m*** destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
<4> Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
<4> "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of m*** destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
<4> President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
<4> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of m*** destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
<4> Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
<4> need i go further?
<7> Lupine, make sense.. then how we could have end up that way ?
<4> "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of m*** destruction and palaces for his cronies."
<4> Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
<8> http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002689006
<7> Lupine, who was advocating the war in iraq, at the time then ?
<4> "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of m*** destruction and the means of delivering them."
<4> Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
<2> pmo: just about everyone
<4> pmo, i just showed you who was advocating war
<4> "There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
<4> Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.
<2> RF: i think we should investigate those who claimed one thing, then turned around and said the opposite thing
<4> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of m*** destruction."
<4> Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
<8> All this after 9/11
<4> "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of m*** destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
<4> Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.
<8> Referendum on Iraq in 1998 was signed by Clinton and Gore.
<4> "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of m*** destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein.
<4> Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
<7> RustyFord, can you let people talk..
<4> pmo, sure you can talk anytime you want
<4> but don't be stupid
<2> pmo: these people speak for the citizens they represent
<8> And what did we find?
<8> http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002689006
<8> there is gallup poll on support for the war and the current status of the war.
<7> Lupine, advocating.. iraq war.. hmm.. as far as i've seen powell did.. bush.. publicly on media.. those in charge.. have all abality.. to share or not share secret documents with others.. not the same for everyone. .
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#nhl
#linux-noob
tokendomelakalema
#politics
#politics
Denemark pornstars
anaconda graphical installer 6600 gt
#stocks
install sql server not case sensetive
#visualbasic
|
|