| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Comments:
<0> yes, I agree she should sue
<1> I do nto believe in law
<2> Lupine how about private school
<1> law is written by...lawyers
<2> she don't represent a state
<1> I dispise lawyers. qed
<2> but a private orgarzation
<2> ****en laws
<0> I believe in law. But poorly written laws cause serious problems sometimes
<2> police state
<3> gpoo: if the student is of the age of consent, then yes, should strictly be a civil matter
<2> Katey I don't trust those who write laws
<0> gpoo, shaddap about 'police state'
<0> we don't live in a police state
<4> Well, besides laws, there's judges, and constitutionality.
<2> Katey I mean you can't have *** anymor3e
<5> yet...
<2> cops will knock your door and arrrest you
<0> in a police state a paper wouldn't be able to write about this
<2> Katey I am anti *** before marriage
<0> and she would have no recourse
<2> but I am also anti big goverment
<0> which she obviously does
<2> Katey semi police state
<0> so stop making stupid hyperbolic statements
<2> Katey k, you made a point fine
<0> no, it's not even a semi police state
<0> (whatever that would mean)
<4> I'm anti-putting-restrictions-on-people-just-because-some-important-guy-happens-to-maintain-a-silly-moral-standard.
<2> Katey but it soon will turn to a police state, you watch if we allow such rules
<0> gpoo, but it won't be allowed
<2> Dominus same here, I upheld my own morals, what my parnets I tought my self
<0> that's why we're not a police state
<0> sheesh
<2> not some idiot law
<1> never say "I am mad becasue you broke a law" say: I am mad becasue you imposed on me or mine" a breech of MY code MUST be addressed. Thus you operate honorably (by the highest standards; your own), and you do not make some claim to an arbitary "law". You seek not justice, but rather vengance. -at least I am honest
<3> all those who do not champion ever single amendment in the bill of rights.. deserves none
<2> Katey that why I don't elect people who setup laws that are silly
<4> I also accept that my moral standards aren't necessarily the only right ones :)
<0> gpoo, how do you know what sort of silly laws they might set up?
<1> Dominus I would never accept that
<0> they're not elected yet?
<2> Katey you read the laws
<2> you follow the news
<1> my stanrds are the ONLY correct ones
<0> gpoo, nevermind
<2> you read journals on laws
<2> you watch cspan
<4> Hmmm
<0> you don't understand the question
<2> Katey ask it again in more simple matter
<1> there is only ONE primary comamndment imho
<2> "I feel differently about 17-year-olds than I do about 18-year-olds," Giddings said. "I don't necessarily believe the penalty for the two should necessarily be the same."
<4> Point is, standards are largely a product of how you've been raised.
<1> "To thine own self be true"
<0> gpoo, if a candidate hasn't ever served in office before, how could you know what sort of "silly laws" they might draft?
<2> Katey I belive and trust god laws, more then men laws
<4> Is it right to trust the ones that raised you without any questions?
<2> Katey thier rethoic
<0> lol
<2> Katey thier stance on the issue
<2> Katey you just don't vote some in just becuase
<2> he a dem or a repub
<0> gpoo, and what was this particular politicians rhetoric?
<0> what was her position on such issues?
<0> Did it even come up during the campaign?
<2> hmm have tougher laws on teacher/ student conduct
<2> how do you know
<6> any predictions on our world cup match with italy?
<2> well i am not from that state
<0> I can see a fine, but jail time is silly
<0> it's ridiculous overkill
<2> I don't even see a fine
<2> it not illegal
<0> well, it is if there's a law against it. :)
<0> that would be the definition of "illegal"
<2> you can't say becuase he 17 today it more wrong then when he wakes up tomrrow when he 18 or if he 18 that next day when he graduate it more right
<3> I was there in 1979 when the news first trickled out that "Joan said it was OK."
<3> It was one of a series of steps reversing Ted Kennedy's previously announced decision not to run and take on the then-incumbent, Jimmy Carter. I was a young staffer for Sen. Kennedy at the time, and my heart started beating faster. I wonder if Al Gore's staffer's hearts are beating faster?
<2> Katey it not, even the laws say 17
<6> Katey, you don't believe in incarceration?
<7> now we will see much better
<2> Katey I belive in incarecration sure, but this is not a illegal action
<2> big bother is stoping you
<0> gpoo, if there's a state law against teacher/student ***, then it's against the law
<2> in some ways
<0> but jail time is ridiculous
<2> Katey thier none
<8> :/
<2> read it
<2> it say 17
<0> gpoo, I did read it
<2> it illelgal
<2> Katey he not 17 he 18
<2> Katey I don't know who wrote this laws, as I am not from that state
<0> gpoo, no. the politician said she WANTED the law to be for people under 18.
<6> what about 14/
<6> ?
<0> Obviously she didn't draft it that way
<2> Katey State Rep. Helen Giddings, D-Dallas, wrote the Texas law in 2003 that criminalizes *** between educators and students. But she said she wanted the law to apply only to students 17 and younger
<3> Why not just ban +b *!~*@*swbell.net
<0> If she had, this teacher wouldn't be sitting in jail
<2> she wanted
<1> 17 yr old in love with a 18-20 yr old: reasonable
<7> Its not working again.. I wonder if one of my scripts screwed it up, I cant type on mirc.
<2> pilgrim` sure even at 25
<1> heck I met my 1st wife when she was 14 and I was 17
<7> I better undo that script
<7> hmm its working now.
<6> see? democrats want to legislate the bedroom!
<2> I seen 25 year old girl marry a 70 and up
<7> maybe its only when I move it to the other desktop
<3> pilgrim: yea? and now you know.. nothing good can come of it!
<2> panini they do so
<6> gpoo, like anna nicole smith
<2> panini rape is wrong
<2> panini yes
<4> I don't see how *** would be the criterium though... *** and having a teacher/student relationship aren't at all related.
<1> Lupien well thats true at ANY age
<2> and she did it for money
<0> gpoo, READ: But other legislators added amendments to Giddings' bill when it reached the floor of the House, making it illegal for educators to have ***ual relationships with students of any age.
<7> What could cause that ? I can type in mirc on monitor 1 but not monitor 2
<1> next tiem I will get a bottle of Ripple and a cheap hooker. IT COSTS LESS
<0> the law, as it's currently drafted, criminalizes *** between students and teachers of any age
<2> Katey so a 40 year old professor and a 30 year old student
<6> katey that even applies to 50 yr olds in night school
<2> the 40 year old professor would go to jail
<7> although other applications I can type fine on monitor 2.
<2> under such law
<2> how stupid
<7> this is wierd
<0> gpoo, according to that law, I guess it is
<3> katye: if the student is IN the cl***, or there is any actual authority over the student.. then yes, I think it should be illegal
<2> who vote this wacky people
<0> yes, it's a stupid law
<0> no disagreement there
<7> It must be a setting on that monitor
<3> Free: i have no problem with mIRC
<6> damn democrats
<0> voters need to contact their legislators
<2> Lupine so why is thier no law against bosses and thier empoly having ***
<6> always trying to legislate morality
<2> panini thier god laws, and thier men law
<2> the two don't mix
<2> I follow both
<6> *** is a god law? or man law?
<2> I won't have *** till marriage
<1> back country couple I knew in New Mexico: he 30 she 14. they ended up with like 6 kids and may still be together as far as I know. When I left; she was 45
<2> like such law
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#networking
#beginner
weird abacus
#heroin
in da club-arabic remix
#nhl
#computers
#windows
#politics
#hardware
|
|