| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
Comments:
<0> very common?
<1> i had friends when i lived on the streets and stuff that would jump gays for money
<2> Murder*
<1> they would go to gay bars pick the dude up, take him out back and beat hte **** out of him and rob him
<3> were u that rusty?
<1> pollini no, i never hung out with them
<4> that's ****ed up
<0> it's not common where I am
<1> "friends" is not the term i should have used
<1> just people i knew
<5> Airbuster how would you know if it were common?
<4> RustyGuns the fact that they targeted gays makes me think they had a ***ual motive as well
<0> KoB, news usually reports it
<3> did u face that difficulty in some periods?
<5> Airbuster no, usually no one cares about such incidents
<5> Airbuster no one would have cared about those teens in FL either if they hadn't been caught on video
<1> Us_male , the majority of them hated gays
<2> US-Male, Or they think gays are wussies, who may have some cash?
<1> heh, they just needed the money
<4> maybe
<1> hahaha
<1> and don't think i am laughing because i think its funny
<4> I think people who hate gays have some deeper motivation relating to their own doubts abot their ***uality
<6> Heh, easier targets than other men to pick though, USMale was right about them having an ***ual element to their attacks.
<3> dam it..these helicopters are produced in tens of thousands
<1> i always laugh at **** like that because its so sad, if i thought about everything i have seen, i would be dead=(
<2> hans__, are you saying gays are less likely to defend themselves then straight men?
<6> Herzen: no, I'm saying USMale's hunch is correct :)
<0> Rusty, you sound depressed
<1> Us-Male you know whats ****ed up?
<0> anyway...
<4> what
<3> no rusty is fine
<7> the most macho guy I ever knew...was gay
<5> off to get Japanese food
<5> think I'll eat Thai for dinner maybe
<8> Advances in computational technology, component miniaturization, biocompatibility of materials, and sensor technology have led to much improved feasibilities of useful brain-computer interfaces in the next five years. Since the 1970s there has been increasing interest among agencies of the Federal government, such as NSF, DARPA, ONR, AFOSR, U.S. Army, NIST, and NIH, state agencies, universities, and private industry in improving human-com
<1> the same gay guys the very next week would do the same **** over again, with the same dude beating the **** out of them
<3> a jap?
<7> he was soo big and soo strong and ...walked the other side
<1> so maybe they "liked" it
<2> pilgrim`, since homo***uality is a choice, anyone can be gay
<9> how do you know that the 'poor defenseless bum' wasn't accused in the community of being a dangerous transient ***ual molestor that preferred young children? it's funny how they're referred to as 'poor harmless bums' sometimes and 'transient ***ual predators' other times.
<1> ?
<0> Mexican food for me. tacos and burritos. can't beat it
<2> pilgrim`, there is just a social group which gravitates towards it more
<1> i always thought it was weird
<8> Experiments with animals and demonstrations by a few human quadriplegics have shown that useful neural signals from the brain can be sensed, interpreted and used to drive a computer or simple prosthetic device. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency has an initiative to fully develop a brain signal interfaced prosthetic arm within five years. Similar commercially developed prosthetics are expected to follow rapidly
<10> Lupine: you sound like a conspiracy theorist
<10> Lupine: you're making the scroll way to outrageous
<1> read it
<1> its good stuff
<3> i didn't like to try mexican food in az instead of domestic food
<10> Rusty: highly speculative and off the point
<11> this freaking cnn bimbo is a real dunce. kera phillips or whatever. she is arguing with the pakistan foreign minister and completely missing his point. the u.s. violated pakistan sovereignty in that airstrike. she is trying to make it look like pakistan is at fault
<10> Rusty: I have no doubt that you can move your eyes and trigger a computer and type something
<0> Taco Bell ain't bad, and the food is probably better for you than those from Mcdonald's
<0> or not as bad for you
<6> TacoBell? Aint' bad. It's like dog food with lettuce and tomatoes on top :P
<10> Rusty: I never said THAT was impossible ... I said sending thoughts to another brain directly is impossible
<1> hahah Thank you Lupine which is what i was witnessing earlier
<2> mangelo, its just the evil imperialist American empire at it again!
<1> and apparently is signifigant enough for DARPA to research
<1> =P
<2> Damn those handsome devils!
<0> hans, I'm talking about in relation to other fast-foods. It's better than Mcdonald's or the King
<11> Herzen one by one we are losing allies because of this imperlistic crap
<10> Rusty: DARPA researches all kinds of stuff ... as well they should
<0> and I've heard spicy foods are good for you, in some way
<3> poor usa..i went with girlfriends &found nothing else but silly films
<1> OcDoc, i never said anything about "sending thoughts"
<1> if i implied that i am sorry
<6> Airbuster: I think Burger King is the most healthy for fast food, simply because they grill their burgers.
<10> Rusty: when you show me how the physical laws will allow transmission brain to brain of complex thoughts, I'll reconsider
<7> DARPA funded a straight ESP test.. back int eh 60s
<1> i said there has to be "Some energy" there
<1> i don't know what that energy is
<10> Rusty: Lupine said so and you seemed to be on his side
<12> Taco Bell ain't bad?
<8> OcDoc: you said it was physically impossible, as the brain emminated no known signals.. you also kept NOT saying "straight"
<3> like energy u are getting from iraq
<10> pilgrimn: and it failed
<8> in fact, you denied even the existance of measuring brain thoughts..
<12> Sheesh. They slather Alpo on a tortilla, then drench it in battery acid...
<11> that airstrike could result in an ouster of the current, friendly to the u.s., prime minister in pakistan -- and his being replaces by an anti-american pm
<10> Lupine: I never said the brain emminated no known signals ... that would be obviously false
<1> OcDOc i do not believe that "mind transference" is possible
<8> OcDoc: you said it would "violate the laws of physics"
<1> I said "Will to live"
<10> Lupine: I said the brain does not have the ability to encode thoughts into signals
<8> and yet, modern medical science has been doing it since the 1930s
<3> i always bellieve that brain is a stupid device: someone has to bellieve in god
<9> mangelo: of course, which is the ultimate goal. why would we want friends in the middle east when it's much better for us to make them our enemies then conquer them and do as we like afterwards?
<8> OcDOc: sure it does, it does it ALL THE TIME
<8> how the **** do you think we walk? or talk?
<10> in fact I would have spelled it emanated
<1> which in my opinion is not REALLY ' Thought transferance"
<2> Zaw, Strange way of conquering, setting up deterministic governments
<2> Wouldn't setting up despotic puppet regimes do better?
<10> Lupine: no it doesn't ... the brain has no known way to encode thoughts into signals and no known way to receive them from another brain
<8> ocdoc: in my particular case, I had extensive neurofeedback training.. where I had to learn to change my thoughts, to prevent headaches
<1> I am not "scientific" there are many things i believe that happens that are scientifically explained but i "personally" do not know that scientific explaination
<8> ocdoc: how the **** do you think the brain communicates with the other parts of the bodies?
<10> Lupine: which has nothing to do with sending those thoughts outside your brain
<1> its more important to me to live than it is to be stuck in a lab for 30 freakin years trying to explain something i can't
<3> lupine: by nerves
<8> poll: right. encoded communication
<0> Herzen, was it you who said disagreement among politicians is a good thing?
<9> Herzen: of course not. you need to create the facade of control for the citizens, much like the way it is in the united state of america. the candidates you're allowed to vote for are already pre-selected and pre-determined for you with a side of media to spark the lesser evil 'debates'.
<2> Airbuster, sounds like me, I don't remember specifically saying it
<8> In a nutshell, EEG based neurofeedback training involes me, the patient.. changing my thoughts, while a doctor reads my brain waves
<2> Airbuster, certainly public political discourse in Democracy is nothing but healthy
<0> well, it's not a good thing in itself. Neither good not bad
<0> but the ability to express disagreement is always a good thing
<10> Lupine: right ... carry on
<2> Airbuster, I think it depends if its discourse between politicians who are credible, men with integrity and vision
<2> or Democrats
<1> Lupine, anything there that says that the patient showed greater activity when a "family member" was present?
<3> the best thing is to bellieve in the force of god &nature ..&forget these explanations
<8> RG: even worse.. THOUGHTS of family members :-)
<1> WOAH!
<0> Herzen, right. Disagreement in itself is neither good nor bad. Ability to express disagreement is what's important
<2> Right
<11> the brain does do encoding. a very good example is the retina. it pre-analyzes the aggregate of rod and cone responses before sending them up the opitc nerve to the optic cortex
<8> RG: everyone knows the axium "think of a happy place"
<2> In any society we won't have agreement
<2> totally
<8> mangrelo: great example
<0> right
<2> disagreement is natural
<1> Lupine that was just before they pulled the plug wasn't it?
<0> because no 2 people think alike
<2> and the ability to express it is pretty important
<10> mangelo: it sends them along the optic nerves, not broadcast into the ether
<8> in fact, the brain is an ecoding/decoding masterpeice
<8> Ocdoc: um, explain how we can "see" thru a cats eyes, by measuring those signals ?
<1> Lupine hehehe i was looking at the brain of all animals
<1> humans have the largest
<1> +P
<8> that was ****ING cool.. seeing thru the eyes of a cat
<13> herzen did canada have any civil rights movement at the same time the US did
<10> Lupine: you mean, how can you simulate vision with a computer?
<1> for SOME strange reason
<2> redfish, not as pronounced, Canada usually follows the U.S. in social trends though
<1> and science only know of less than 13% of what the majority of the brain is used for
<2> maybe 5-10 years behind
<1> now THATS depressing Airbuster
<3> a cat's eye see black&white
<1> not true
<14> You simulate how the cats eyes work.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
you need to be root to perform this command
outhrown
www.xmovie.com pass
#nhl
shizident
What will u do when LIFE THROWS LEMONS AT U
#unixhelp
#heroin
#politics
#beginner
|
|