| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71
Comments:
<0> ++C: no, you contradicted what I said "I think ____"
<1> er, no
<1> naval
<0> ++C: you made the claim. Prove it.
<2> fuzzy navel power!
<1> as in objects that displace water
<3> navels displace water
<4> Iran will not merely research ways of creating nuclear bombs. They will research, and fund, methods of creating nuclear terror attacks, and that is the true threat they represent.
<2> hehe
<0> ++C: when someon says "I think ____" he can fill in the blank with any damn thing he pleases, and has no responsibility to prove it to anyone
<5> US_Male: as long as you label your claim as a plausible hunch based on inferences from stuff you know, I have no problem with that.
<0> ++C: so, prove your claim.
<0> ++C: try reading.
<1> so, how bout that ELF?
<3> is it reasonable to ***ume pakistan bnt over for the us just because they didn't oppose the war in afghanistan? dunno
<2> BoogyMan wants Hillary to nuke Canada!
<1> they finally hit the big leagues
<6> jhicks - LOL
<3> lots of sympathetic men are in the pakistani hierarchy
<1> PYITA time for ELF
<2> hehehehe
<7> yo
<4> Yeah, how dare Alito's wife break down in tears as a fat homicidal blowhard like Ted Kennedy made ridiculous, libellous moral judgements about her husband.
<2> oh see see
<5> But you gave off the impression of implying more solidity to your claim than you had in hand by phrasing it that way, even though rhetorically, you're correct about the limits of the logic of such a statement.
<0> ++C: nok, you need to read more accurately
<6> jhicks - Hillary is ugly enough to blow up Cannukistan with a stare
<2> hahaha
<0> ++C: I stated "I think ___________"
<3> my mom the liberal was incensed about those tears. said the hearings were unusually brutal
<5> Pickle: She broke into theatrical tears in response to what Lindsay Graham, R-
<5> SC asked Alito.
<0> I did not state that it was true
<2> BoogyMan: didja hear about the Hillary special at KFC?
<4> plusplusc: Says you.
<6> no
<0> or verifiably true
<1> Parliament of Whores.
<2> BoogyMan: two large thighs, two small breasts and two left wings
<1> read it.
<1> know it.
<1> live it.
<8> dunno why the liberal senators even bothered asking about abortion. abortion will *never* be outlawed.
<6> jhicks - ack
<2> hehe
<3> renea: its da base, man
<4> plusplusc: What the American people who aren't partisan saw was Alito's wife breaking down as she was apologized to for the egregious lies being told about her husband.
<5> Pickle: the whole hearing was theatrically staged and rehearsed. I must say the dems did a dreadfully inept job on their end of it.
<9> Alito was tripped up a few times by the dems, I was suprised.
<2> it was all fake
<2> phOnee
<4> plusplusc: That's interesting spin. Had the hearings not been a complete disaster for the Democrats, I wonder if that would still be the spin.
<8> tortus: perhaps, you could put 9 conservatives on the SC, still won't be overturned. it's the base as you said.
<3> alitos wife was theatrical? that is just cynical
<1> A pious Christian would abhor capital punishment, and abortion
<1> a callous pragmatist, neither
<2> tortus: cynicism is good for you!
<1> but it takes the liberal point of view,
<3> renea: it could be overturned. lots of bad precedents have been overturned by scotus
<1> to arrive at the conclusion that one is okay, while the other is not.
<3> jhicks:P you mean scepticism
<9> walstib: thankfully, government isn't run by pious christians.
<2> tortus: cynically skeptical
<1> isn't it?
<3> oh
<5> Pickle: Of course Alito isn't going to do anything like tell Ruth Bader Ginsburg or any woman to her face or even indirectly in the guys-only steam room at the Y with his buddies that "you women need to be put back in your place in the kitchen, birthing babies instead of a bunch of lesbian lawyers taking men's jobs."
<6> plusplusc - After watching her husband be attacked all day by the biggest piece of scum, drunkard, hypocrite in the Senate she should be able to get a p*** on getting misty. It wasn't theatrical, geeez, go flush yourself
<3> jhicks: you and i are both, most likely
<4> plusplusc: Of course Alito is neither the racist nor misogynist that the Democrats tried to guilt-through-***ociation him as being.
<8> tortus: if abortion is legal, it keeps the conservative base mobilized. overturn rvw, support will peal away now that the central issue to many is null.
<9> Pickle: no, he's just a swiss cheese federalist, like Scalia.
<3> renea: i think some people do actually operate on principle. this is an important principle
<4> plusplusc: What makes those lies even more galling is the fact that Alito is the precise obvious of both those positions, having one of the diverse staffs of any sitting judge.
<2> tortus: well, i'm going fishing tomorrow so it doesn't matter :)
<5> Pickle: The worry is that his view of federalism and governmental and constitutional powers is likely to make it practically very difficult to enforce laws designed to give women equality in practice.
<1> teh US of A is doomed
<9> Pickle: personally, I could care less if Alito ****s pigs, but his views on the constitution concern me.
<4> plusplusc: Is it? I couldn't tell through all the cheap shots about Alito being a racist and ***ist.
<2> antifed: look outside your window
<3> jhicks: yup. fishing erases all the fruff we have forced upon us
<9> jhicks: heh, I would if I were in a place with a window.
<2> antifed: is there a black helicopter looking at you?
<8> tortus: you and me, we perhaps act out of principle, but our politicans act out of selfish reasons; campaign contributions, re-election, power
<5> Pickle: I'm sure hoping that the Alito personnae he projected at the hearings is in fact the real Alito.
<10> what does it mean when your tit twitches
<4> plusplusc: We'll never no, since there was no serious questioning during this hearing, and that includes the hypocrite Joe Biden.
<5> Pickle: no one alleged that Alito is racist.
<3> renea: true that. we were talking about ideological base, though
<4> Er, know
<9> jhicks: you really ought to read the writings out of founders someday, maybe then you could make an informed decision or two about politics.
<2> antifed: i have. i agree with most of them.
<4> plusplusc: Yes, everyone who tried to ***ociate him with the views of an irrelevant college ***ociation did.
<2> antifed: hamilton gets on my nerves
<9> jhicks: obviously, not..
<5> Pickle: Joe Biden is not a hypocrite, but rather a blowhard self-important clown, at least at those hearings.
<4> (Which weren't even their views, but never mind that for the moment.)
<11> Will the real Sam ALito please stand up
<3> wtf with the biden rambling? is he paid to do that?
<9> jhicks: hamilton gets on your nerves? yet you support Scalia & Alito's views on implied powers?
<2> antifed: but i'm all good with most of madison and jefferson
<4> plusplusc: No, he's also a hypocrite because he cynically suggested the hearings be cancelled.
<2> antifed: did i ever say i like scalito?
<9> jhicks: if you had the slightest reverence for Jefferson or Henry you'd be livid.
<5> Pickle: which ***ociation? I thought the one in controversy was the one that lobbied against Princeton being coed
<6> plusplusc - That is a complete fabrication as ALL of the lefties on the committee tried to make it look like Alito was a racist
<2> I am livid. I've been livid for years.
<9> jhicks: or Madison...
<8> leviathan today, leviath tomorrow, leviathan forever
<2> I'm a secessionist for crying out loud!
<4> plusplusc: Yes, that was the implication, though the truth is that they did not "lobby" for that.
<3> turgid is not the same as livid
<12> hi DarthBurg
<2> tortus: I am so not turgid!
<5> Boogy: the allegations had NOTHING to do with Alito being a racist. It had entirely to do with the implications of Alito's views on gender equality
<9> jhicks: damn... sarcasm is wasted on me..
<4> plusplusc: They did publish opinion articles on that subject, however.
<6> plusplusc - Moral equivalence in this argument simply makes you look silly
<9> jhicks: in the words of the great poet.. "my bad"
<2> haha
<5> Pickle: People published opinion articles alleging that Hillary Clinton murdered Vince Foster too.
<9> jhicks: somehow attacking you felt unnatural..
<2> antifed: yew hit jes like a lil gurl :)
<4> plusplusc: And for the record, the opinions of that organization on both race AND gender equality issues was called to question during the hearings, in an obvious attempt to smear Alito on both counts.
<3> but there was no record of alito in that orgs archives
<9> jhicks: hah
<5> Boogy man: you're speaking nonsencical bull**** now. I can think of many possible concerns about Alito's constitutional views and those having to do with presidential powers, but nothing remotely like you allege
<2> It's obvious that no supreme court judge can be trusted.
<3> no mere man can be a justice
<8> jhicks: never trust your government
<2> exactly
<2> NEVER
<2> "whatever they're for, i am against"
<6> plusplusc - wipe your mouth man. They practically called him a cross burner!
<0> I heard Alito eats babies
<4> plusplusc: Yes - and if you were part of a leftwing organization that published some member's positive opinion on Trotskyism, would that make you a Trotskyist by implication? Would it warrant interminable questioning on the issue?
<2> boiled babies
<10> damn, nice rebuttle
<5> BoogyMan: NO ONE did.
<0> barbecued babies
<2> no
<2> boiled
<0> with mesquite
<8> US-Male: I heard it was with Heinz ketchup.
<2> ewww
<6> plusplusc - Insinuation is lost on you in your attempt to feign ignorance of the sleazy nature of the democratic party
<2> tabasco
<0> ohh no, ketchup spoils a BBQ
<2> tabasco doesn't
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
mirc .pnick
#stocks
cumgal
#nhl
ctorrent solaris
#hardware
#sql
#mirc
#unix
#stocks
|
|