| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Comments:
<0> it sounded as if...
<1> there is a much stronger case for military solution to iranian nuclear interests
<1> much more so than iraq
<0> and this case is?
<1> iraq's military capacity had been severely diminished after 1992
<0> correct
<0> Iraq wasn`t a real opponent
<2> miss: please
<2> calm down
<1> and the reality of them achieving or even meaningly pursuing a nuclear program is almost nill
<2> ur just making things worse for urself
<3> how?
<4> Go Go Mets
<1> however iran does have a real capability
<0> right
<1> both with delivery vehicle
<2> caspase: we sure have
<1> and a warhead (they are obviously trying to enrich more plutonium)
<3> how am i making things worse for myself?
<0> that`s their right
<2> considering the new atomic technology
<3> i'm not scared of someone who hides behind a proxy
<1> MCSE: no it isn't
<0> it is
<1> ok
<1> by that logic
<1> its our right to nuke them
<0> no, that`s called international law
<1> um
<1> they are most certainly not 'allowed' to pursue nukes
<1> no one is
<2> miss: threatening someone on IRC is against the policy
<1> the people that have the nukes said so
<1> have made that the international law
<3> against WHAT policy?
<1> no one else is allowed to have nukes
<0> evereyone is, as long as he hasn`t signed the treaty
<2> miss: i can easily send a log of ur conservation to ur ISP my dear :)
<3> hey, go for it
<0> Iran has, but says it isn`t building nukes... so=
<0> ?
<1> so what ?
<1> its like this
<3> like i said, i'm not scared of someone hiding behind a proxy
<0> its their right to enrich Uran
<1> a non nuclear iran is a lot easier to deal with than a nuclear iran
<0> ..as long as they don`t build nukes
<2> miss: and with some work on my part, i might be able to find where u love and come and knock ur door
<1> but there are rules that they subjected themselves to
<1> and they are not following at this point
<3> go for it :)
<3> you'll have to work hard to get away with anything.
<0> right,... and didn`t break those rules yet
<1> i mean you do have a very valid point about non treaty participation
<4> Iran doesn't get that it's saying to everyone in the world that I have the right to urich Uranium too.
<1> but they already made a deal with the devil
<3> middle easterners stick out like a sore thumb in my town.
<1> yes they have
<0> no, with Russia and China...
<1> they have broken numerous transparency and inspection laws
<2> miss: if u dare go to Iran
<3> why the **** would i go there?
<1> er rules
<2> im sure they will treat u in a very special way ;)
<1> i mean its a given israel is going to respond in a very real and forceful way
<4> Oblivion : do you watch Nancy Grace ?
<1> particularly when iran makes no bones about israel being the theatre for the weapons it's developing
<3> of course, because i'm not from a land of oppression, and i wouldnt take **** from you cowardly men.
<0> Israel hasn`t signed the treaty AND has nukes... so would you attack Israel?
<1> me personally ?
<0> lol
<1> yes i would have along time ago
<2> oppression?
<0> no, the US :-)
<1> if i were the us
<1> i would have severed ties with israel long ago
<2> u dont get what i mean do u
<2> ur too dumb to think
<1> diplimatic ties at least
<1> economic ties are a horse of a different color
<0> that`s how it is
<1> if you gotta buy missiles and technology
<1> and extasy
<1> israel is your spot
<1> but they aren't to be trusted
<0> ...and communication tech
<3> then tell me what the **** you mean, because i'm just ***uming you're implying something bad would happen to me.
<1> they've blown up our stuff before
<2> And we r not coward
<1> they get us in trouble a lot
<1> they spy on us
<0> USS Liberty...
<1> the official word is they stole our plutonium
<1> but we probably gave it to them
<0> i think so...
<1> but only through some shady agents or something
<4> South Korea and Israel are places to go to for Communication Equipment.
<1> yah
<0> France was involved, if my memory serves me right
<1> mcse: when isn't france involved ?
<2> miss: how would u like me to track u down?
<0> good question
<2> because im starting to get annoyed, almost enough to make it worth the effort
<3> any way you want. i'm not scared of you.
<4> Oblivion : stop your madness.
<0> brb
<2> i value my time, u have to be pretty damn annoying to spend it on u
<4> Oblivion : you can track me down but if you kill me your *** will be blasted.
<1> whats funny about oblivion
<1> is he is using
<1> : Server : irc.inter.net.il [Internet Gold IRC Server]
<1> the ****ing mossad is reading everything you say right now
<3> he's hiding behind a proxy, he probably doesnt care
<1> and is getting ready to go interrogate your cousin in a most brutal fashion
<0> interesting
<1> ahaha
<1> interesting
<5> jeeeeezzzz
<1> hiding behind a proxy from the nsa/nro/cia/mossad
<1> throw in dhs and fbi for good measure
<5> just tried explaining to my dad why a celeron or a duron 1 gig cpu and a basic graphics card and 512mb of ram wont play the latest games
<2> miss: i tend to log this conversation and send it to ur ISP soon :)
<5> it was impossible
<5> trust me
<5> lol
<3> go for it :)
<1> hahaha
<5> #he just doesnt understand
<2> miss: i will cheer when i get a case opened against u
<1> adelphia is really gonna care
<1> hahaha
<1> adelphia has enough to worry about just trying to stay in business
<3> adelphia could give a **** what i say online
<1> haha
<3> besides, they arent going to lose precious money
<3> because we pay too much for what we have as it is
<2> i guess u dont believe it can be done but i ***ure u u r wrong
<0> Miss: Are you a Bush voter? ...just for the records
<1> oblivion can expect the following reply "wait.. are you a customer or a big business? no? **** off'
<2> but dont take my word for it, they will provide u with a lawyer
<1> haha
<1> provide her with a lawyer ?
<1> for what
<1> dude you dont get it do you
<3> MCSE: MCSE on +#politics +#iranwar #war-on-bush
<1> thats in criminal cases
<3> yes, i voted for bush
<1> i voted for nader
<6> lolz
<0> shame on you
<1> you dont get a court appointed lawyer in civil court
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
hashish finsbury park
#microsoft
#hardware
#beginner
britagrrl
rom mapping failed
#nhl
delphi internal error L1333
#beginner
badtzmaru layout
|
|