| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Comments:
<0> StanleyI there is one way we could limit the scope and power of the Lobby.
<1> Each US congressman must raise $7,000 per day for re election...the lobbiest pay the way
<0> TomM-- sure do. Try polling the military. Or just ask me. no one ever polls me, which means, they call boston, or LA, or New York, or Miama, but never red america.
<2> this chick in the Care Paul Honda commercial is damn fiiiine
<3> red america?
<1> Did you ever ask who owns your congressman?
<4> Darth...errr the military? LOL....
<0> lapointe "Bush Country"
<5> IAmKing I hold pretty strong positions.. no fence sitter I
<3> darthburg whats that...the south?
<6> DarthBurg-- Fox Polls offer good news?
<0> lapointe it is not my job to educate you sir.
<5> but I agree with your summary of what a "moderate" is
<1> Did you ever question where your congressman gets the money ?
<3> you can't give me a two-word answer? screw you then
<0> Yes.
<7> two word
<0> hehehe
<0> and thats about the best they got to offer folks.
<7> oops two-word
<1> USA is the only nation where a congressman must spend $10 million to get a hundred thousand dollar a year job
<5> DarthBurg I probably agree with you.. but when polsters call up its usually after a hard day at work and Im having a beer and enjoying my dinner and I tell them to get ****ed
<2> on the head
<2> bonks*
<2> hm
<4> Darth the oath the military takes makes any poll regarding their CINC irrevelant...They dont question, they obey, as it should be.
<5> I think thats why alot of Republicans never get polled
<0> TomM-- true, but it is curious that the opinion of the Military is not reflected.
<7> w***up Tom
<5> they work all day and dont want to be asked a bunch of silly *** questions at dinner time
<4> Cry...not much...da usual! :)
<1> on the question of military obeying orders...what happend to all those from the war in vietnam who deserted?
<3> screw red america up the ***
<7> I know why they do not poll Hillary Clinton....
<6> CuLtOfOne -- No, they are sitting at home listening to talk radio
<7> shekeeps pics of Vince Foster with her
<0> StanleyI well, the US elected one.
<5> Im listening to the Flaming Lips new album right now
<2> Cryolas: o_O
<5> pretty inventive stuff
<2> vince Foster?
<5> what are you listening to AAAman?
<2> HR!!!!
<7> lapointe...the point of that comment was.....???
<2> Edgar Renteria!
<2> 1-1...Braves v. Padres
<7> Publius...yah Vince Foster
<8> this movie is a hoot
<7> he got some Foster Care
<4> StanleyI u are a poor troll. I have found Australians make poor trolls. I find it interesting that a nation as recent as the 60s that still had out houses would breed anti trollers...:)
<2> lol
<0> Cryolas oh thats easy, Red America likes bush, therfore, Screw Red America, they are obviously not needed anymore. Kim Jung Ill, Sadaam, the nutjob in Iran, Fidel, are just nice guys, Bush is the evil ****er.
<7> Reds support Bush.....errrrr
<6> DarthBurg -- Red American does not like Bush now, though you do
<4> Bush is not evil, Bush is a god fearing christian, Bush is just stupid! :)
<7> now all I like about it is what the star player cards are worth
<5> red Americans aint blue
<2> muhahaha
<5> I reckon there is a country song in that someplace
<7> TomM-- is...errr nm...way too easy
<3> cryolas i dont know, i was just mad
<0> AAAman sure quick to dismiss them election results. Donkeys can not even win Duke CUnningham's seat. give it a rest.
<4> Cryolas LOL
<7> lapointe if you did...then you would know that red factioners and conservatives do NOT see eye to eye on anything..
<1> TomM--`..your future generations will be paying for this war..not mine.
<5> on NPR yesterday they said the democrats may be in deep ****.. on one of those commie talk shows where they all speak in whispers
<7> as a matter of fact...rightwing dictatorships have always been hard on commies
<7> the dems ARE in deep ****??
<7> or deeper ****
<5> I was listening to talk of the Nation this afternoon... they were trying to do a piece where the guy comes on bashes Mercury in fish and the invited scientist concluded there was no decent evidence that the fish in Mercury hurt people
<4> StanleyI fine, we pay our costs. Has your nation ever repaid the US for its defense in WWII? The Brits gave a **** less. Ungrateful buggers! :)
<7> thats a pile of ****...
<5> it was funny listening to the journalist backpedal
<6> On FEMA Head Brown: Brownie, You're Doing A Heck Of A Job...
<7> I remember the mercury scare...and at base level..it had validity
<5> and trying to come up with a reason to be outraged at the US government for not protecting us from Mercury in Tuna
<6> On Rumsfeld: He Has My Full Support...
<6> Bush On Harriet Miers: She'll Be Confirmed...
<7> TomM-- the brits never forgot who helped them
<6> It is best to let Bush speak for himself
<1> TomM--..does the US taxpayer have the word "****er" on his head?
<5> Cryolas the scientist they brought on examined the Harvard study and conducted his own and noted that there was little indication that even caused impairment in kids
<5> and was even beneficial in two of the endpoints that they measure
<0> StanleyI apparently the Donkeys sure seem to think so
<7> Cukt....the mervury levels in the seafood were very high in the 70s...
<5> well I mean dont quit eating tuna any time soon from what I heard
<7> some seafood was not sold for a while after those findings...for good cause
<7> Swordfish Steak for example
<6> Cryolas -- White House press secretary Scott McClellan says the purpose of the speeches never was to raise Bush's poll numbers.
<5> Cryolas they went to Islands where the people consume 7 times more fish than the average American does.. eat fish like 12 times a day
<4> StanleyI not a problem, we got it....we spend more on our Air Force than Australias GNP!! :)
<5> 12 times a week rather
<5> I mean it is their one source of meet basically and they conducted these tests
<0> scott mcclelland said that? bwahahahahahah what a loser.
<7> AAAman.......you and yours represent an insipid sort of backbiter
<6> Cryolas -- The president believes it is important during this critical and unsettling period to update the American people about our strategy for victory
<7> chances are...theTuna was not as effected
<1> TomM--..how long do you think the US taxpayer can continue to play policeman to the world before going broke?
<0> you want to know why Bush's poll numbers are in the ****ter, look no farther than Scott "Am I really here?" McCllellan
<4> StanleyI as long as it takes.
<6> voters grow impatient
<5> and they concluded that one test.... in the Harvard study.. the kid with a does of Mercury at 7 parts per Million 5 years later was a little slower doing the finger test....
<5> dose
<7> when was test conducted?
<7> what year
<6> "Our strategy is clear in Iraq," Bush said during remarks in the Rose Garden that day. "We're on the offense. We have a plan to win."
<5> that was the basis for the scare on impairment
<1> TomM--...care to list a few of the social services americans are getting for their taxes compared to other western nations?
<5> dont know.. go to NPR
<7> Democrat whining
<5> look it up
<7> free service
<5> check out the talk of the Nation section
<7> I only asked for the year in which the study was done
<5> I dont know
<7> the period I am talking about ouucred in the mid 70s
<7> occured
<5> could be there was more Mercury in the fish in the 70s
<7> do you know why the EPA came to be??
<5> but if there isnt now
<5> why are we ****ting our pants over it?
<7> because the GOP was especially lax in letting corporations pollute...
<7> Lake Erie caught on fire
<1> profits seem to be the bottom line, not the enviroment
<7> imagine what the concentration of pollutants had to be to cause that...
<7> StanleyI...at one point...yes
<1> CEO's do not have to live next to lake erie
<7> so an agency had to be made to force the worst ones to clean their **** up
<7> I will bbiab...a flick I want to see :))
<4> StanleyI Ill list just one. The privilege of living in the greatest nation on earth. The most powerful and influential. As far as "social" services, besides outstanding police and fire, emergency medical services, water, (and we have indoor plumbing), we are able to pay for whatever other service we need. Unlike other certain so called democracies that are really socialist countries! :)
<5> Cryolas.. the Democrats controlled the House the Senate and the Judiciary in the 1970s... tell me exactly how the GOP let lake Erie catch fire?
<5> tell me how it was the GOPs fault please
<5> Id like to know
<5> the Democrats controlled congress for 40 years straight
<4> Cult...it wasnt...it was Nixons...:)
<5> LOL TomM.. Nixon polluted it all by himself?
<9> Am I the only person left who doesn't hate Nixon?
<4> CuLtOfOne yeah why not? He did everything else!! :)
<1> Norway has the worlds highest standard of living..socialist
<4> Herzen I dont hate Nixon. Hes just an obvious target when conservs start braying! :)
<1> www.Nationmaster.com
<2> Herzen: I like him.
<4> Stanley good for Norway...Move there. :)
<10> I liked Nixon. He tried to cover up for his men
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
speedstream 6520 firmware aliant
#stocks
#nhl
#csharp
asrock+rma
#bsd
sftpd-server chroot
#beginner
#nhl
|
|