| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Comments:
<0> BITCH SLAPS ARE FOR BITCHES
<0> YOU'RE NOT A BITCH ARE U KING
<1> YER_BUDDY: nope, but you were your daddy's bitch...and still are ;)
<2> YER_BUDDY is a special olympian
<1> BoogyMan: hahahahah
<3> pilgrim: remember.. powder THEN the shot. don't load the shot first..
<4> hemi, yeh i have to fix the links section
<5> Yer Buddy is just back for more punishment, that's all.
<4> thats on the to do list
<4> lol
<6> heheheh=))
<5> We clamped down on his ghey *** last time.
<7> WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Two federal air marshals are facing drug charges after allegedly agreeing to smuggle cocaine from a man who turned out to be a government witness, the U.S. attorney's office in Houston, Texas, announced Monday.
<6> its better to add them all up and then do them all at once
<8> MY_BUDDY you will not be happy until you get banned from all the chans will you
<6> that way you aren't forking around
<9> damn it
<0> WHAT THE **** ARE YOU DOING HERE DOLPHIN?
<6> they are all the same damn people
<9> blasted telent session
<2> MY_BUDDY - Isnt there something on the Saquatch Humpers Network that you need to see right now?
<3> pilgrim: you know, if you irc'ed from your Apple ][.. you woulnd' thave this problem
<0> WHAT A BITCH
<0> WOW
<6> yeh |-X-| is "buddies" with Yer_BUddy
<6> don't forget his dumb *** either
<9> Lupien at home I DO irc from an Apple ][
<9> yes it can be done
<10> "The apparent attempts by the U.S. administration to reinterpret certain interrogation techniques as not reaching the threshold of torture in the framework of the struggle against terrorism are of utmost concern," the draft report said.
<10> the UN says we're doing torture, and the US says they're not judging us according to the 'laws of war'
<11> oh noez. not the UN.
<11> run away
<3> vize: the UN wouldn't know what real torture was
<10> it's quite funny because we consult and listen to the UN whenever it suits our interest
<9> UN be heah to Hep us
<2> VIZE - The UN is a whitewashed turd that PROVES you cant actually whitewash a turd
<11> the UN is selective, arbitrary, and pretty consistently reflects the anti-US opinion of the member staes
<11> *states.
<11> so, basically, **** the UN.
<3> boogy: well, if you leave it alone out in teh sun, it wille ventually get hard and whitish
<9> UN and what it says is food for thought...wait...
<10> so when the UN tells iran not to build nukes, **** the UN
<11> was it Sudan or Libya heading the Human Rights commission?
<9> oil for thought? food for oil?
<2> Lupine - Its what you have when it dries that makes it just so special! LOL
<9> how does that go?
<11> no, the Security Council, specifically, not some lame-*** branch headed by one of the worst human rights abusers
<10> oh wow corruption with government officials?
<10> say it isn't so!
<6> the UN if you put blue helmets on them and give them APC's look like smurfs
<10> Air marshals face cocaine smuggling charges
<10> what else is new
<6> personally i think if they are busted with cocaine trying to bring it in over hte border they should be charged with treason
<12> Bush should bomb the UN.
<6> but thats just ME personally
<10> American officials said the most significant flaw of the report was that it judged U.S. treatment of detainees according to peacetime human rights laws. The United States contends it is in a state of conflict and should be judged according to the laws of war.
<10> yeah, because according to the 'laws of war' human rights no longer apply
<10> so bombing US troops is legal also, nuking american people would therefore be legal
<10> right?!
<9> Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
<12> who knows. There's no law -- the powerful make it up as they go along.
<6> vize, beheading americans is A-ok!
<9> its a cut above
<11> no, according the the laws of war, terrorists and insurgents aren't just happy go lucky plain old civilians.
<9> rules of war they are to be hung
<10> what are they?
<10> their enemy combatants, so what would that make us?
<12> Laws of war, whatever, there's only law if there's someone to enforce, and that only happens after the war.
<10> the plain old civilians?
<13> god dammit
<14> ke6i and the victors enforce it
<9> armed combatants, per the Hauge Convention and the Versaille Treate and the Geneva COnvention... MUST be uniformed and must obey the recognized Laws of War
<10> "The apparent attempts by the U.S. administration to reinterpret certain interrogation techniques as not reaching the threshold of torture in the framework of the struggle against terrorism are of utmost concern," the draft report said.
<10> hmm
<11> that would make us legal combatants.
<10> that's exactly what pilgrim did
<11> and uniformed soldiers
<11> and them, not.
<11> hence
<10> and timur
<10> heh
<12> Who cares, we can do whatever we want. Screw the law.
<11> they don't get those protections.
<9> it is customary and recognized as within the law to order sumary execution of 5th collumn insurgents and sabatours
<10> yeah it's our job to police the world and do as we please
<3> p[il: i'm starting to think that is what we OUGHT to have done.
<9> Lupien seems straight forward to me
<12> USA is not getting caught up in world court and all that stuff. Anyway.
<11> the former, sure. the latter, within certain constraints, which are not and should not and will not be determined by the UN, such as it is.
<9> vize obviously some one needs to
<10> hey it's okay if we bomb civilians throwing rocks because they're not real combatants
<6> It is an eternal truth that acquiescence under insult is not the way to escape war. I think it to our interest to punish the first insult; because an insult unpunished is the parent of many others.
<10> under the laws of war we can kill whoever we deem threatening
<11> yeah, that's what's happening
<11> they throw rocks, we bomb.
<12> Yeah I mean that's the thing. Bombing is okay? Who knows.
<11> uh huh
<10> if i deem a lil girl with a squirt gun as threatening, under the laws of war i can chop her head off
<15> THOUSANDS of people flocked to southern Egypt today to seek blessing from a calf they believe was born as God's reply to the publication in Europe of cartoons depicting the prophet, police said.
<15> Some 20,000 thousand people had gathered in front of Mohammed Abu Dif's house in the village of Tunis to see the holy mammal, whose skin folds when he was born reportedly formed the words "There is no God but Allah", a police official said on condition of anonymity.
<12> It's best not to think about it too hard.
<10> if i deem a smart afghan man as threatening to national security, i can withhold him without real cause
<9> Pickle was he eating the Holy Maddona Tortilla?
<10> no wait, if someone is practicing their religion in front of me they're a threat to national security
<11> vize: no, you can't. You're not the government. Thank goodness for that.
<10> no i'm speaking for the govt
<9> vize depends on how they practice it. int he 19th cent the Thugge practiced theirs with m*** slaughters of innocents
<10> they're not here so i'm saying what goes through their head
<15> pilgrim: No, but he'll probably be served up with the Holy Hummus
<12> You can lock him up in your basement, but you might go to jail for this.
<10> pilgrim, what do you call what we're doing in iraq?
<10> heh
<10> are we not slaughtering innocents?
<9> vize needful t would seem
<12> we are 'accidently sluaghtering innocents' whiel aiming for 'terrorists'
<10> but it's ok to kill 25k civilians as long as we kill 50k terrorists!
<10> 2 for 1, yay
<9> vize if you say so
<12> who knows
<11> you're not saying 'what goes through their head', since it's pretty clear you don't have a clue.
<9> must work for a major media outlet. seems to have the talking points down
<10> hey so being we're at war, if they come over here and bomb us killing 200 military men and 400 civilians it'll be ok
<10> it's just the laws of war heh
<12> this law during war thing is just a big bag of hat air though.
<9> vize I think that is what you said yes
<6> they can try, but they will get their ***es kicked
<12> It's the 'figleaf' -- whatever.
<10> since we're at war bush can do whatever he thinks as best for national security
<11> no, this is not Voltaire's 'Candide'.
<6> heh
<9> vize one would hope so. Being that he is Cand C
<11> no, the military establishment can and does decide that.
<11> I doubt Bush micromanages every aspect of military or intelligence policy
<9> Timur yer casting pearls there lad
<6> if we were attacked you would see alot of Americans volunteer for military service
<6> just like after 9/11
<11> how so?
<11> if the terrorists attacked us again here they'd wish they'd had what was previously being done
<9> how many in this later age do you think have Read Voltaire?
<16> haha
<9> the new Dark Ages are almost upon us
<17> the laws of war, hilarious
<18> pilgrim - eh, they still force 'em to in college lit cl***es and your better history ones.
<17> i've read voltaire last year
<12> I'd go for a dark ages, if we could have some proper decadence. Instead I think we're getting the tight ***, religious repressive style dark age.
<9> weezyl there is hope still? I thougth Pandora ate too much and rolled over on it
<18> Although I managed to skate through without reading it, but I tested out of freshman lit.
<17> the french revolution needs to happen in america
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
stop httpd kubuntu
#politics
katesplayground.com/members/index.php
#beginner
#beginner
#windowsxp
#stocks
how to install pentiume 4
#stocks
#beginner
|
|