@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61



Comments:

<0> They claim to have enriched uranium to the nuclear power leve. I don't think they've actually created nuclear power yet, let alone nuclear weapons.
<1> djgofurse: ok, that's different then what it sounded like you meant by nukes
<2> u can use sea platforms or long range bombers but its a weak strategy
<3> We dont really need airfields anymore cruse missle is the future
<4> AAAman, yep, there were some issues with intel, OLD NEWS.
<1> my bad
<3> Or RC
<5> TheTailor -- CHeney is the frequent visitor to the CIA. Why?
<4> AAAman, the congress authorized the action.
<2> And u cant hold the ground with troops
<6> AAAman: he needs to keep tabs on his mistresses
<2> There is no place to deloy them
<2> u setone up it gets nuked
<2> deploy)
<5> THeTailor -- Congress was definitely mislead
<2> The ***uming the nation in question doesnt have ICBMs



<2> thats ***uming)
<3> As for Iran We could fix their cart so as they would not be a thereat to us for some time to come If we wanted to really take care to that problem
<7> "<+Chubtoad> We cant invade" you want to invade china ?
<7> in a land war ?
<7> ^^
<2> No im saying that u cant invade any nation that posesses even tactical nuclear capability
<4> AAAman, if that is true, so was Bush and Cheney, they all had the same info.
<3> You dont invade a country like China
<2> much less ICBs
<5> Mislead is a polite word for lie -- "We have firsthand descriptions of biological weapons factories on wheels and on rails," Powell said in the Feb. 5, 2003, speech. Thanks to those descriptions, he said, "We know what the fermenters look like. We know what the tanks, pumps, compressors and other parts look like."
<2> ms)
<2> lol
<4> AAAman, and so was Britten
<2> I said nothing about invading china lol
<4> AAAman, then if that's what he said, someone told them that.
<3> You supprise a country like china with a first strike or dont do it at all
<2> i was making a broader observation
<5> Downing Street Papers of course
<8> god AAAman is on efnet too
<4> Britian even
<2> Rand corp ect runs non nuclear senarios...U.S. vs China...China wins 5 out of 6 times
<4> AAAman, I don't know what those are
<3> anyone had Bubble Hash man perty good
<4> AAAman, but again, this is OLD NEWS, why bother with it now? Is this all you have for the election?
<2> 3 were China invades US 3 were vice versa
<5> TheTailor -- It continues for years, which the RIght WIng cannot accept
<7> "never lead a land war in asia"
<2> U.S. won one of the senarios where it was in the defensive posture
<9> WTC Controlled Demolition: MIT engineer and research scientist Jeff King: what most likely happened http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248
<10> AAAman s still babbling about old DNC conspiracy theories =)
<10> I think he's mentally ill
<9> mit conspirators
<9> nice
<3> No point in invading how do you occupy 1 billion people
<5> US-Male -- You cannot accept the truth and lies are even worse
<2> well china also won 2 of the agressor senarios too
<7> oh, universities have plenty of crackpots
<3> Time for dinner I made some SOS
<10> AAAman: your dusty old conspiracy theories are going nowhere
<4> AAAman, what continues?
<7> the older the science, the more crack in the pot
<10> AAAman: your mental illness is evident
<5> US-Male -- It is on the front page of todays papers and TV News
<2> of course these were non nuclear senarios
<10> AAAman: no, you're talking old conspiracies.
<4> AAAman, what lies, Bush was up front saying the info was wrong, all over.
<9> so u believe the 911 commisions report on 911 fireclaw?
<9> headed by kissinger?
<10> AAAman: face reality. Seek mental help.
<9> ur a bit nieve
<11> Publius : we tried to Defeat China before and it got MacArthur Fired.
<2> so if we ever go to war with china i think given all the data we will use nukes
<4> AAAman, further, it down't change anything as to why we are in Iraq, and NEED to be.
<5> US-Male -- Even Bush spoke about it today
<2> lol
<1> Chubtoad: we would trump China if we HAD to fight...but I doubt we ever will
<1> ThomasWT: he shoulda been fired
<1> dumb***
<10> AAAman: your obesssions show your mental illness. Get some help man!
<2> Not according to rand corp and thier super computers



<2> lol
<5> US-Male - you are irrational, and expect thus to gain seats in the next election
<11> Publius : then you have no right to say anything about defeating China. If you can't defend General Douglas MacArthur.
<1> ThomasWT: hehe, I was being funny a minute ago. I think he is a great man
<10> AAAman: you''ve been shown to be mentally unstable over several years
<3> MacArthur was an ***
<1> ThomasWT: but his was genius was specific, imo
<5> US-Male -- The reason you are here is you are not all there
<1> war*
<10> AAAman: you were banned for like, 3 years solid because of your insaniy.
<4> AAAman, yeah, like last time when Bush KICKED YOUR ***.
<2> The dept of defense runs these senarios constantly now and we often lose vs china and russia
<10> AAAman: you haven't changed since hten.
<2> But
<2> We have nukes
<11> Douglas MacArthur would have nuked the Korean-Chinese Border
<1> lol
<10> AAAman: you need to contact your therapist.
<2> The figure there is no point in running m***ive nuclear exchange senarios
<11> with Chinese Soldiers coming over it at the time he would have nuked.
<1> ThomasWT: do you believe he should have been fired?
<11> Publius : no.
<5> US-Male was let out recently and has not recovered
<10> AAAman's raving lunacy has been well documented over a period of years.
<1> ThomasWT: hm, I need to research the situation...but going to war with China then and there would not have gone over with the people. imo
<10> in fact, AAAman was banned here for about 3 years solid.
<2> After a m***ive nuclear exchange whoevers left better have bunker buster nukes if they want to finish off the enemy
<5> US-Male -- If you have multiple personalities, press 2, 3 and 4.
<10> for being a wackjob lunatic
<10> AAAman has never typed anything here that resembles sanity.
<5> US-Male -- you have schizophrenia, listen very carefully and a small voice will tell you the number to press.
<2> or fire off 100 nukes over one of the few m***ive defensive positions remaining
<1> LOL
<11> Publius : please research. and read http://www.kimsoft.com
<10> AAAman was banned for three years, for a reason =)
<2> lol
<5> . We know who you are, we know what you want, and we know how to reach you.
<2> try to melt whatever mnt the base is hidden in
<10> AAAman is mentally ill and doesn't belong here
<2> since there are no other targets left
<5> No one will be able to help you anyway
<10> AAAman's comment on his therapy -->> [19:34] <5> No one will be able to help you anyway
<4> AAAman, remember, Bush KICKED YOUR LIBERAL *** ACROSS THE PLANET TWO YEARS AGO.
<4> AAAman, so watch it!
<5> US-Male celebrating his own madness
<2> lol these people talk about politics like a football game
<1> ThomasWT: they page wouldn't load
<10> poor AAAman is suffering from "Post Election Stress"
<2> I win! BUSH KICKED ***! YOU LOSE< BITCH! lol
<9> bush is kicking all of our ***es.
<2> too bad its far more serious
<10> AAAman's demostrated lunacy earned him a ban for *years*
<10> Years! not weeks.
<10> not days
<10> not even months
<9> ur a joke us female
<9> stfu.
<10> and vap0r420 gives oral *** to AAAman
<4> Chubtoad, I didn't say that, it's unwise to put words in my mouth :-)
<11> Publius : I guess someone hasn't been paying the bills.
<2> Ive been banned multiple times..most of the time for simply expressing an opinion contray to the ops
<10> in fact, vap0r420 is even MORE mentally ill
<1> US-Male(female): he gotcha!
<10> if yo can belive that
<1> ThomasWT: my internet works fine!
<4> Chubtoad, in fact, I love to see AAAman squirm, you notice he can't address those truths.
<2> What truths?
<10> vap0r420's lunacy --->>>>> [18:46] <9> This chart illustrates the dominance by - the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg - in the major decision making processes and institutions of the United States of America over the last seventy years.
<9> read the article
<9> fool
<10> vap0r420: HAHAH
<5> see the Bush duck-tail growing in!


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #politics
or
Go to some related logs:

#mirc
#goal
SNL Star wars outtakes Kevin Spacey
_glapi_get_dispatch
#computers
#red
stroke/bore of ls2
#online
#beginner
#politics



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes