| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
Comments:
<0> and so be it
<1> I'm still puking over the mention of that postmodern windbag, Foucault.
<2> JegaPRIME: that's just your ***umption
<3> Stereotypes exist for a reason bub
<4> If you wish to use the label homo***ual to describe a person that engages in strictly homo***ual behaviors than I will accept that.
<4> It is not my ***umption.
<4> It is observed behavior.
<3> i like 5.1 sorround myself.
<0> i dont see what the big hangup is
<4> People frequently equate homo***uality with effeminancy.
<5> i cant think of too many gay guys who do women...
<0> so people are gay, big ****ing deal
<2> you can still "be" a homo***ual, or an "audiophile" or whatever
<0> its not like theyre discussing the big bang theory right infront of you
<2> regardless of wheter it's behavioral
<4> US, can somebody be strictly hetero***ual?
<0> its choice
<6> rond: to be effectively sarcastic and funny requires both cleverness, knowledge and a good sense of timing as well as humor
<2> I myself AM an audiophile. Yes, I admit it
<5> Jega: yes.
<4> Does a person remain a hetero***ual upon having one homo***ual fantasy?
<2> JegaPRIME: sure if their chosen ***ual activity is hetero***ual
<4> Ok.
<1> USMale has a pair of Krell monoblocks attached to his gonads.
<2> if theyh are buttraped in jail, they aren't gay necessarily
<5> JegaPRIME: while that's true, i dont know of too many gay guys with hetero fantasies...
<3> bi***uals would of course, be a cl*** of themselves
<4> What percentage of your ***ual fantasies can be homo***ual as long as your chosen ***ual identity is hetero***ual?
<4> 49%
<4> ?
<2> JegaPRIME: that's called "bi***ual"
<1> Prime: Gee, no one knows. And no one expects what one thinks about to inform their behavior, see?
<3> I am banging in there at about 110% hetero fantasies.
<4> Ok.
<2> possibly "latent bi***ual" if you have not done it
<4> What percentage shifts you from hetero***ual to bi***ual, then?
<4> 24%?
<1> I mean, even though I think about naked flute girls dancing around me in wild abandon, I could just as well end up with a gay truck driver.
<1> You never know.
<2> if you've never had any *** you could be a "non***ual"
<3> Donkeys are latent intellectuals, they talk about it a lot, but never actually aplly it.
<2> JegaPRIME: es, I'd have to say 24%. UNless we invent a middle category
<3> we have a term for that as well, "Virgin"
<2> let's go with 25.00001%
<1> Darth: No. It's "gay."
<4> That's a lot, Male.
<3> praxis9 oh come now, boning your mat4e in the rump is "Just like ***"
<4> I don't think gender is an especially useful way of analyzing ***uality.
<1> Being virtuous and exhibiting the least bit of self-control is the most homo***ual thing one can do today.
<2> JegaPRIME: well you're describing a bi***ual who likes one *** more than teh other
<2> JegaPRIME: you can call it whatever you want, it remains the same in reality
<4> And I don't think who one enjoys sleeping with is especially useful in understand a person.
<4> Say your goal was to understand a person and you asked the question, do you like boys or girls?
<1> Why do we tolerate "discussing" the latest idiot ***ual theories with liberals?
<3> Gender used to work as an excellent way of determining ***uality, especially in biology
<4> I think this would be a better question: When you fantasize about relationships do you see yourself holding or being held?
<1> Michel Foucault. God, what idiocy.
<2> why do we want to "understand" this person necessarily ?
<2> who cares who he ****s ?
<4> People that have hangups, probably.
<4> Undertanding others helps you understand yourself.
<2> is it necessary to have 100 ***ual categories by percentage ?
<2> I'd say no
<3> More importantly, why should the FED give a rubberstamp to an activity 70%+ of the country does not much care for?
<4> Are you talking about gay marriage?
<4> Those 70% should mind their business and enjoy life.
<4> It's no fun being offended.
<2> there are to many ***ual proclivities to give each combination a unique name
<2> *too
<1> Yes. Understanding the most twisted, atypical mutant will help you "understand yourself."
<4> Unless you're bored. Then, being offended makes you feel like you have a life full of important things.
<3> marriage requires a man and a woman, so no, i am not talking about Gay Marriage, even tho thats what the Media and the Donkeys want it called.
<4> That is because you have defined it to be a relationship between a man and a woman.
<1> It's enlightenment through a proxy fetish. Or something.
<4> Why would you care what other people do?
<3> oh puhleese, the first person to scream offense is a donkey. Just ask em why they think Bush is evil.
<4> I don't understand why people spend so much time on worrying about other people's morality.
<3> "I'm Offended!" its the Donkey Intolerance anywhere for free card
<1> Prime: You're the dumb*** who brought it up.
<4> Worry about yourself.
<4> Praxis, you've resorted to personal attacks.
<4> You lose.
<3> changing the meaning of a word that has been around a while just to appease a fruitcake minrity is insanity.
<2> I would generally agree about MYOB , but half the time the subject is brought up by people who are doing it and want attention
<3> minority.
<4> I'm so enlightened I am unable to control myself in a chatroom, Praxis seems to be saying.
<2> other half is people who object
<3> Fruitcake pun intended.
<4> You need to not think of it as appeasment.
<4> You have no right to decide what others do.
<4> Appeasement connotes a sense of loss.
<4> You've lost nothing because it's none of your business.
<7> you know, changing words around to skew things in your favor, like homicide bomber =x
<4> If you accept that you get to live your life as you wish and you get to give advice to those that consider you important you'll be happier.
<8> salstress you there
<3> I am not deciding what others do. thats just horse puckey. fact is, the minority wants majority approval, through the fed. pure n simple.
<4> No.
<3> yes.
<4> Government does not represent majority approval.
<2> JegaPRIME: hey you mentioned you seemed to need a roto rooter -- I just offered you an alternative
<4> The government's primary purpose is to ensure immanent rights are respected.
<4> Is marriage such a right?
<4> I don't think o.
<4> But living your life with whomever you want to is such a right.
<3> GOV handily no longer represents the will of the people? JegaPRIME nice try bub
<4> Because that is a manifestation of liberty.
<3> and that right is not being denied.
<9> Hey Jega.
<4> What government does or does not do in a practical sense is not relevant in a discussion about ethics.
<10> nobody knows what an immanent right is
<9> Still being a creepy pedo stalker?
<4> Ethics is inherently idealistic.
<3> whats being denied is calling it something it ain't, and can never be.
<3> Ethics has very little to do with it.
<4> What is relevant, then?
<3> if Ethics were involved, we would not be having this discusion.
<4> And why is that?
<4> See, you see it backwards.
<2> gos, speaking of pedo.... I got a jury summons and then I started thinking about how crime "Seems" low here
<4> You see marriage as the 'right' way and then you see this change as a reversal.
<2> and acording to stats it s low crime
<3> what is relevant is the minor fact that a minority wants something it can not have. and anyone who points that out is branded as being a meanie.
<4> Well, that fact that it is a minority, in of itself means nothing.
<8> or a homophobe
<8> that one just kills me
<4> The nature of America is a limited democracy.
<2> but the web page that tracks conviceted sef offenders says there are 24 registered *** offenders in this zio code
<2> jesus effin christ
<3> Marriage is not necesarily, the "Right" way, or the "Wrong" way. Marriage is an institution that has been around for a while.
<2> *zip code
<4> You will not persuade me with your talk of majority beause a full democracy is likely a tyrannical system of government.
<4> Institutions change.
<2> I think I will do my jury duty now
<4> See War of Independence.
<3> what is relevant is the minor fact that a minority wants something it can not have. and anyone who points that out is branded as being a meanie.
<4> American Civil war, et al.
<4> It means nothing they are a minority.
<9> Jega: England wasn't a democracy at all, during the war for independance.
<9> Heh
<9> Darth: What's the issue, anyway?
<4> A primary purpose of the Consitution is to ensure the rights of the minority against the rule of the majority.
<4> Government's job is to protect liberty.
<4> Not to be establish normalcy.
<3> Institutions change when the MAJORITY changes it, we do not change institutions to appease some flaked out minority, and whats so pathetic, is you KNOW that, but its tossed out the window because you simply want to call something a word it can not possibly be.
<4> It is unjust for a government to p*** any judgement on the legitmacy of a marriage based upon the genders of hte participants.
<4> Rather, it should ask, do you want to get married? You do? Ok.
<4> To identify the genders of those involved and then p*** judgement amounts to discrimination.
<3> nonsense.
<4> Darth, this is false.
<11> It amounts to the definition.
<3> it is not discrimination determining gender.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#debian
#nhl
ABBACADABA
#cph
bounching boobs
#beginner
#linuxhelp
#computers
dg965wh alsa optical
#worldcup
|
|