| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61
Comments:
<0> All of his with a shred of honesty.
<1> Just be fearful for your freedoms man
<0> his = us
<2> Guest86, did we find Sarin in a roadside bomb?
<3> The whole world may be affectd by the US, but the whole world doesn't get a say in US policy. Just Americans.
<2> Guest86, I haven't lost ANY freedoms
<4> d o u consider biological weapons as wmd
<2> Guest86, I have nothing to fear
<0> Yeah I am terrified Bush might have the CIA listening in on my Conversations with Zawahiri.. (Right)
<1> Hey Pickle - right on, and thats a problem
<4> let bush listen i got nothing to hide who cares
<2> Guest86, it's not a problem for us.
<3> Guest86: No, that's not a problem. That's the way it should be.
<0> I never realized that even talking to the enemy of you nation is a constitutional right. Much less givng him aid and comfort and maybe a safe house.
<5> Guest86, Who are you voting for Jan23?
<0> I liked Alitos answer, No other countries laws or legal reasoning should come into the decision making process of the supreme court.
<4> i agree
<4> this whole idea of taking european ruling is bs
<6> yep, and international consideration should come in via treaty's signed and ratified by the US
<0> Its not only obvious, but a justice or 2 have forgotten that we are an autonomous nation.
<1> every freedom is preiceless, arrived at over years of effort and turmoil. we should all want to preserve frredom of expression at all costs.
<1> Jan. 23 - for the Conservatives
<5> lol
<6> guest: I agree, what ammunition are you currently carrying in your firearm right now?
<5> I was way off
<7> nice..it's freetrade today
<3> Guest86: America is a sovereign state--the greatest and most powerful such on earth. The fact that that greatness means that America affects other sovereign states doesn't affect America's right to sovereignty, rather it means that those other nation-states should take a lesson from the USA and maybe raise themselves up a bit so that they aren't so heavily affected by the US.
<0> Well IN a recent case, I forget which, It may of been the emminent domain case or something else one justice referred to guidance from another countries precedence which damn near should be an impeachable offence.
<4> the whole world depends on us
<8> howdy.
<0> I wouldnt impeach the Judge but it shows you how warped some of them can get.
<4> our military bases stationed all over the world is the only thing preventing many conflicts
<1> U.S sovereignty is not the issue. all nations are sovereign or should be.
<8> Was watching Pres Bush's stand up and every cable channel stopped it...
<6> FT: when they ruled on the execution of a 16 year old, they relied on the death-penalties from other nations
<0> Lupine ahh that was the case.
<0> They could of come to that decision and should of based on US law only.
<8> Everyone went back to Judge Allito hearings. Sigh.
<6> there probably are a few.. but they were based the "cruel and unusual" on other national laws
<3> Guest86: You yourself defined the fact that the rest of the world doesn't have a say in US policy as a "problem", so obviously that sovereignty is an issue to you.
<0> Ive been watching alito since 6:30 this morning, I am ready for a break. Taking the day off today.
<1> it is only a 'problem' when the efforts of one nation impinge upon and affect others
<7> europe is more advanced &civilised from this side: the maximum penalty in germany 4 example is 7 years !
<4> **** germany
<3> Guest86: A powerful nation's policies will *always* impinge on other nations. That's life.
<4> **** europe as well
<6> pol: they go from firing squad to 7 years
<7> freetrade: i see there are some silly impolite customers..
<4> this is usa not europe
<1> and once someone proves that Iraq had something to do with 9/11, then that nation should be dealt with in the international arena
<3> Guest86: For example, America changing its internal agriculture policies, for example, profoundly affects Canadian farmers. It can't help but do so. Does that mean that Canadian farmers should have a say? No.
<3> Er, cut out a "for example".
<7> o.k...u may represent your ****ty point of view in another civilised way mr saddam!alpha
<4> hah alol
<0> Back.
<1> we live in an interconnected socoiety Pickle. Lets hasten the day when we can deal as one international government, looking to the interests of all of us
<3> Guest86: Let's not.
<0> Thats a trollish statement, Its never been the case for humanity and never will be.
<4> world gov that will never happne
<9> NWO is the epitomy of hell
<3> Let's mind our own business and ask ourselves what policies have made us a vastly less powerful nation than America.
<4> startrek is on that is the closest u will ever see it
<1> its soming already in so many ways
<1> coming
<7> guest 86: the most important question is: did zarquawi &similar group exist before? or they are a result for occupation??
<0> Humanity has always existed as diverse countries and populations usually with 1-3 super powers. or supreme powers.
<5> Pickle, Lmfao
<5> Did you see this
<5> The leaked Space-Weapons platform from the liberals?
<5> They want to ban weaponization of space internationally
<3> Guest86: You're living a pipe dream if you think that Americans are going to give up their sovereignty.
<4> dam liberals
<1> i suspect they arose out of utter frustration. like ignored kids stamping their feet. but they had bucks and did real damage
<0> Its an absolute fact that Zarqawi was a member of al Queda before we ever went into Iraq.
<3> Herzen: I thought it already *was* banned by treaties.
<1> Nations dont ever give up their preeminent positions Pickle. It happens as they decline
<7> freetrade is a real symbol for liberal -thinking
<3> Herzen: Not that such a ban could be effective.
<5> Pickle, Maybe, even if its not, like hell Russia, China or USA is going to give a real **** about what the Liberal Party says
<5> Its such a bull**** issue
<7> yeah..but was he there anyway?
<3> Herzen: But, but, we were a LEADER on landmines (that no one uses anymore anyway)!!! We can do it again with the weaponization of space!
<1> jeez i have work to do....dont want to leave here its fun. first time here. thanks guys
<7> that's right freetrade: this justifies this war
<3> Guest86: Lots of non-pre-eminent nations are not about to give up their sovreignty to a world body.
<5> Pickle, it seems the Liberals can't come out with real policy
<3> Guest86: Including Canada.
<0> America has wanted to use defensive space based weapons to shoot down ICBMs, It turns out right now we can do it better from a 767 or 747 forget which. And the technology has worked and is moving along. Never meant to establish offensive weapons in space.
<0> Theater anti missile weapons are much more effective, so far.
<7> this guest argues good! strange he has no nick
<3> Guest86: And in Canada's case, I don't know if you've noticed or not but we're on the verge of creating more, not fewer, sovereign states, starting with Quebec.
<4> whats wrong with having offensive weapons in space?
<0> Alpha, No need for them
<7> he left pickle
<0> THats one reason.
<5> Nobody wants to weaponize space anyways
<4> i think it should space technology should advacne what type ot tech it might be
<5> maybe China does
<4> whatever
<0> Alpha, Only reason I can think of for space based weapons (Other than defense) would be to use a against a meteor that may stray uncomfortably close to our planet.
<5> but some UN bull**** isn't going to stop them
<3> There's an advantage in creating weapons that can take out satellites.
<5> because they're god damned fascists
<3> And as a result, defenses against that will have to be built.
<3> And those defenses will be space-bound.
<7> who's faschist?
<0> The Defense weapons are exactly offensive capable unless you consider destroying an ICBM offensive.
<0> Or burning a 3/4" hole through some soilder on a battlefield ;)
<7> was reagan's project for space ready done? freetrade?
<10> Does the UN actually serve a purpose anyway?
<0> I dont think China will become an offensive power. I see no reason for it. Its clearly not in their interest.
<5> FreeTrade, Chinese mentality demands Hegemony over Asia
<0> Yes, its a forum to try to negotiate problems prior to war.
<5> but aside from that, they have no interest in outside of Asia
<10> In theory FreeTrade?
<5> They see China as the center of the world, and the best place in the world
<5> Why would they want anywhere else
<0> Herzen, But only asia and only certain parts of ASIA which it already consideres chinese.
<9> isn't humankind's war against corporate tyranny?
<5> FreeTrade, Well they want Certain parts of Asia to be in China, Taiwan, but they want their neighbors to be subserviant and tributary to China
<5> Vietnam, North Korea
<0> Japan is not included, Korea is not, Vietnam is not, Thailand, laos, singapore etc is not.
<5> India and Japan to some extent
<0> Taiwan is the major prize.
<10> How are Coporations tyrannical
<10> ?
<5> FreeTrade, They don't want to own the countries you listed, but they want them to respect China and be tributary states
<5> but, I have to go to work
<5> Afk
<0> They have never been connected in their minds to the Japanese.
<3> The boatloads of Chinese who keep washing up on BC shores would suggest that a significant number of Chinese don't want to be in China.
<7> china is attacking only economically but they are not protected: everybody can ask about the secret of this chinese inspiration 7the answer'll be always: hong kong & maccaw!
<0> China is very much china centrist, it believes the chinese people (Those they consider chinese) should be under one state.
<0> or empire.
<0> The fact is they consider Japanese as foreign as Americans.
<7> chinese are real symbol 4 failure
<6> HAHHAHAHA.. Specter has to send his boys off to summon Kennedy from the martini bar!
<9> brahn67499: The motivation behind profit
<0> Lupine haha
<6> FT: precedent seems to be set now: one member of the committe can't talk about another one, if they are not there..
<3> Kennedy's out with the "broads"
<0> People vastly overrate China. It is still a **** hole of relative poverty.
<10> Zenabi that doesn't answer my question
<7> of course freetrade
<10> NAACP is racially bigoted
<7> moreover i bellieve that this development'll help chinese to buy establishments from the wast
<11> but the nominee wont say hey i have no reason y i put that group down
<7> west
<0> Its tremendous growth is because its coming from a xenophobic non technological nation (OTher than war and the neccesities of rudimentary society) It will continue to have rapid growth I would gas until it reaches something near 1/2 per capita GDP of the USA.
<10> Well communism is still a big threat
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linuxhelp
#vmware
#worldcup
#goal
#beginner
#politics
irah-6
#flash
ugly tunisian
#stocks
|
|