| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Comments:
<0> I say prove it and people just ignore me.
<1> they don't ? .... hmm it's been a while since I saw a magazine what with all the free porn on the net
<2> people are defending her premise.
<3> Freemrkts, really? Lupine| is
<0> They aren't doing a very good job in here.
<4> now Coulter I like. She may be a woman, but she's not a *****, like too many Republicans
<5> cbs news said zarqawi was head of al kayda in iraq
<0> No quotes from the wtc women just coulter over and over.
<2> And I saw her get a huge applause in a bookstore about it and its already practically if not in fact a best seller.
<6> katey: I havn't really said one way or another on what coulter said.
<5> not qaida or qeida, but "kayda"
<5> lol
<3> These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husbands death so much.
<2> so obviously some of this resonates with a lot of people who are sick of hearing Bush called Hitler.
<4> Coulter has something that many Dems have, but few Republicans have, and that's charisma
<5> Katey: oooh so they are single?
<1> heh I would not go that far
<0> No she profits from being insane.
<2> You know just because bush approval rating is low, Most people resent the people who call him a hitler and so forth.
<3> I don't see anythink in these remarks complaining that these women are unfairly hiding behind their status in order to avoid debate or criticism
<0> Not many people actually profit from being insane.
<3> this just looks like straight up bashing
<2> The say polls which give bush a low approval rating generally rate him as a nice guy
<6> Not since Cindy SHeeham, have they been so joyous over the deaths of a loved one.
<5> hitler? nah much more like a pol pot :)
<1> Coulter is often correct but she's usually annoying
<2> His as a person polling is pretty ok..
<6> US: yep.
<3> she's giving them **** because they've voiced opposition to administration policy
<7> Saturdays **** on MLB.tv. Damned blackout restrictions.
<4> US, I disagree. I like her
<3> just as she'd be lionizing them if they'd voiced support for administration policy
<1> she annpys me so I want to turn off the TV. But I cannot say she's usually wrong
<6> katey: not really. the _manner_ in which they are acting adn voicing opposition
<2> Given the divisiveness of this country on politics right now, the polorization.
<4> the woman is refreshingly frank
<6> content of a message != how a message is given
<3> hehe
<3> ok
<4> she pulls no punches and isn't afraid to tell it like it is
<1> sometimes she's way off base
<3> :)
<4> or atleast how she sees it
<7> Coulter's anorexia's affecting her mind.
<1> she's kind of like a female O'Reilly
<6> compare and contrast how Lieberman criticizes the administration versus Murtha
<1> only meaner
<8> it's a free country. if you don't like her, then don't buy her book
<2> Look, Ann Coulter is a Whats a good word.. She Says outragous things and people know that about her and expect that from her and we dont pay attention to her for those outragous insane things she says.
<8> simple, isn't it?
<4> no, US
<5> a bitch?
<1> wellthat's not true really.... O'Reilly is more populist
<5> a psychotic?
<6> FM: she often has the right message.. just done inthe wrong way
<2> We pay attention because she doesn make some good points occ***ionaly which seldom have to do with her personal comments or positions. But the larger premise..
<4> O'reilley is afraid to take a side and tries to make himself seem above both sides, at the expense of either. Coulter is not afraid to take sides
<3> Freemrkts, plenty of people pay attention to her
<1> actually COulter is correct more oftehn than O'Reilly
<7> Anyone who rewrites history to make out McCarthyism as good, needs help.
<2> Lupine thats what I am getting at, She does have some value in what she says despiter her sometimes idiotic statements which go alont with it
<4> have I said "sides" enough?
<7> Maybe they'll feed her in the sanitarium.
<1> O'Reilly flips a coin, making him wrong half the time
<7> Put some meat back on her bones.
<6> air: naw, you need more sides to your sides
<2> Very few people agree with her idiotic statements.
<1> Coulter is just too mean
<8> Coulter is someone who is sick and tired of the left constantly accusing the Right of being evil
<2> She is a satirist to the extreme yet makes good points like P.J. Orourk is a satarist (though not as extreme.
<1> but she is correct quite often, although when she's wrong she really goes off the deep end
<4> O'reilley sits between the right and the left and says they're both stupid and wrong, trying to make himself seem above it all, imo
<1> Airbuster yeah
<7> Frugg, don't you get it? It's not about Right vs. Left, but right vs. wrong.
<8> apparently, there's enough people who like Ann Coulter to put her book at the top of the bestseller list...
<1> Airbuster he's attempting max appeal
<2> Or if she honestly believes all those things she says then yeah she has mental issues but some of her major premises, not her statements make a lot of sense.
<9> Ann Coulter uses sharp humor to make her point
<7> Coulter plays on your fears, and sells books.
<8> lol, samizdat
<4> O'reilley kinds of acts like a referee, or maybe a parent who stands between fighting children
<2> She is sayin in an extreme way STOP THE DOUBLE STANDARD
<9> many ppl can't get past the humor though
<3> eh. she's a publicity hound
<6> Airbuster: he's stop what I used to love.. asking a question.. listening to the answer.. then pulling out a videotape of the guy saying the exact opposite.
<1> his schtick is "maximum controversy from a confrontational Irishman"
<2> You Cant have free reign at being asholes, and then when you get it back you cry foul
<2> Thats sort of what she is saying
<0> No one by now needs briefings on the identities of the commentators quoted above. The core group of widows led by the foursome known as "The Jersey Girls," credited with bringing the 9/11 Commission into being, are by now world famous.
<1> it's OK, he makes a lot of $ doing it
<6> Airbuster: when he did that to Sharpton.. oh man, it was hysterical.
<0> I am not finding anything.
<3> her bread and butter is in making outrageous statements and writing outrageous columns and books
<0> As usual when lupine says something I go searching for it and it is buried after 100 opposite pieces of information.
<4> Lupine, I missed that
<10> For God's sake, the woman tries to make a dollar and everyone is all a tither...
<7> She needs a good meal, and maybe a good laying.
<3> When she appears as a pundit on cable news, it lends her legitimacy
<10> She's selling books, that's it.
<0> And this time I still haven't found one quote by these women that is questionable.
<3> heh. like Michael Moore, right? :)
<3> he's just trying to make a buc
<3> k
<6> Air: it was some years ago.. O'Riely refused to allow Sharpton to move on,and kept badgering him which was the real answer, and which was a lie.
<10> Katey, probably.
<4> unlike Michael Moore, Coulter is honest
<11> sint fine i will do your research for you and give you ONE
<3> lol
<0> These widows are credited with getting the 9/11 investions commission undwar.
<2> The Jersey Girls I dont care a wit for them, in fact I dont like them. I woldnt have made the comments Ann Made, I might attack them Hashly and say listen, your victimhood doesnt give you ANY protection against a rebuttal to your idiotic statments (The Jersey girls)
<8> not questionable? perhaps because you side with them?
<2> Now here is the iron
<6> Air: but he's stopped doing that, as I guess as he couldn't get guests
<0> bun-bun you are the one saying.
<0> Actually you are just backing up your own ***ertions.
<0> You are completing your own debate.
<0> Get real.
<2> On a talk show last night with ann Coulter and a democratic woman, The conservatives on the show condemned the language ann used, But talked about her premise, The Democrat Woman would not even admit or acknowlege that the language of the Jersey women was absurd and extreme
<0> You know how quotes are cited and bibliographys are used the reader isn't held responsible for finding the bibliography for the book
<7> My only complaint against the Jersey Girls is that they buy ANY of the 9/11 Commission's lies.
<0> Don't be dumb.
<2> And the fact is what the Jersey women have actually said is much worse in my opinion then what ann said to them.
<0> What.
<6> sin: yea, the jersey girls are responsible for the 9/11 invesgitation.. my god, without them, we wouldn't have known airplanes full of commuters was what struck the buildings!!
<0> Post it.
<0> I want to see what the jersey women have said that is so bad.
<2> And I havent seen yet anyone on the right defend *WHAT* she said,.. And yet I have seen democrats defend what the Jersey girls said.
<11> On Donahue, Breitweiser said, "I'd like to know how our Pentagon, which is the home of our Defense Department, was hit an hour and 45 minutes after the air traffic controllers knew that they had airliners up that were hijacked. I don't understand how that's possible." Phil Donahue, "9-11: A Day REmembered," MSNBC Sept 10, 2002
<0> So what?
<2> When asked then would you admit that what these women said and then they were told was out of line ? The democratic spokesperson said no
<0> Nothing wrong with that.
<11> It wasn't even an hour and 45 minutes from the liftoff of the first plane until the crash into the pentagon
<11> yes there is its wrong
<11> and skewed to give an incorrect impression
<11> and its public record and can be researched
<0> Do that then.
<11> uh i just did
<7> Like I said, the Jersey Girls have lent credence to the 9/11 Commission by appearing before it in the first place.
<0> You ***ert it was wrong prove it.
<0> No you now ***ert that statement was wrong prove it.
<3> can anyone give me a link or a quote from these women where they claim that their views are above reroach because they're 9/11 widows?
<11> BTW sentient LAST time i did research for you i told you it would be the last
<6> bun: i saw one "documentary" proving the 9/11 hoax.. that showed video of the pentaon.. "as you can see, there is no debris from an airplane"... yet you can plainly see two engines, a landing gear, and tons of seats scattered about.
<2> So she basically said its ok to call Bush a goddamn Pig Who is guilty of more murders than Al Gueda and is a Hitler Wo is more dangerous than gterrorisnm (Something like that, thayt isnt a quote but it is ilustrative of the extremism of these statements) and 2 democrats wouldnt even condemn that type of speech.
<7> From the git-go, the 9/11 Truth Movement has been mistaken, taking its case to the government.
<3> I've googled, but haven't found anything
<7> The government is criminal.
<0> You are so stupid bun.
<0> You have to back up your own statements.
<11> im not playing the 'do myh research for me'
<0> You aren't researching for me.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#visualbasic
#red
#unixhelp
glulookat, first person shooter camera
#netbsd
#debian
nano-atx
This mammoth 1979 Atari
#politics
|
|