| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Comments:
<0> you fed it by an exercise called: study
<1> in my mind its ad-homming, but oh well=)
<2> DarthBurg, Bush became president, those other Democrats did not.
<3> i wouldn't put that among the tops of what libs have
<2> So a little bias is understandable.
<3> they can do 'better'
<1> HAHAHA
<2> No one cares what Dean did now for example, or what Sharpton did when he was trying to run
<3> even if they are wrong
<2> cause they aren't president.
<4> P_O Clinton wasn't a donkey? news to me
<2> DarthBurg, oh, you're comparing to Clinton
<2> I was talking about other Democrats at the time.
<0> Clinton was more the north end of a south bound donkey
<4> well, for elected officials, he is the only Donk we got.
<4> no other donkey can get elected, unless its in Jersey, or illinois
<5> http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4076497
<0> Jersey has elections? Do they take Visa?
<4> pilgrim` toricelli took watches
<0> there it is ;)
<3> many libs act like reps are preventing them from joining the peace corps or something
<5> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153720,00.html
<3> when the dems main thing is conscription
<5> Two stories on Bush Screeninghis audience to weed out opposition.
<4> Donkeys are going to be hurting tho, there is a shortage of Union thugs
<1> HAHAHA, yes a Fox news report about protestors and disruptives being banned from presidential speeches
<1> boo hoo hoooooo
<5> Like sheehan was kicked out for nothing more than what was on her shirt.
<3> they should hold them and let Bush kick their ***
<5> She didn't act out.
<6> there are places where 'protesting' is acceptable and places where it isn't
<5> See espectro I have lost all respect for you with that statement.
<7> uh, nothing is allowed on t-shirts
<7> as simple as that
<3> Bush will convert them
<1> sintient, i notice you don't mention that a republicans wife was removed as well
<5> It is people that advocate violence and the revocation of others rights that make you guys are defending.
<1> nice "cherry pick" there bud
<5> I didn't hear about it.
<1> yeh right
<5> Sheehan was on all news stations.
<3> aftera Bush *** whuppin they might change their opinions
<1> it was in the same god damned story
<5> I couldn't tell you her name you are the first person to tell me about it.
<1> bull****
<1> the media in 95% of the writtings made sure to tell you about the republican's wife being removed
<5> So what I bet there are republicans that would protest bush too.
<1> sintient she was removed for wearing a shirt that said "Support the troops"
<8> `426Hemi: of course, that republican wife was just escorted out of the chambers...she wasn't handcuffed and detained for 4hrs
<5> Sad.
<3> someone hold sint so Bush can kick his ***
<5> I don't agree with that either.
<1> L0c0, now look at the reasons she may have been ciffed?
<5> What is wrong with you espectro, who is this guys?
<9> There is an active campaign underway to try and disrupt and disturb his events in hopes of undermining his objective of fixing Social Security, .. Consequently the Bush people maintained a list of people who were known troublemakers and they were not allowed in.
<8> `426Hemi: what reasons?
<9> Sintient that is a FAR CRY from suggesting that he made people swear they were republicans before they could attend.
<1> she had just returned from a trip in Venezeula in which Chavez with her in his arms started cheering "down with USA imperialism, and called Bush Hitler" etc etc etc
<8> `426Hemi: so it wasn't the shirt?
<1> she was a threat, she IS a threat, and she should be tried for sedition
<8> it was b/c of who she was?
<9> sintient your article did not even come close to suggesting that
<4> Whats amusing is, Donkeys say all kinds of things about Bush, call him names, make **** up, say he lied, and then wonder why they are not allowed to go to the public events.
<1> in my opinion it was both
<8> this was just like BUsh having the protesters removed from in front of the governer's mansion in Texas, then having the charges dropped once they were gone
<10> why is this channel starting to remind me of a garage????????
<1> if i was Secret Service i would have removed her as well, presidents have been ***asinated by less than her
<9> loco .. smart move :)
<3> who cares?
<5> http://www.dmregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041016/NEWS09/410160329/1001
<5> There is another much better article.
<5> "DIsruption is unacceptable, expression is."
<9> sintinet once again it is an article about removing protestors.
<5> I think quietly displaying a shirt or a button is expression and not distruption.
<1> The Kerry campaign has also held Iowa events that have been closed to the public.
<1> NEXT!
<5> Hecklers can be removed people quiestly expressing a different opinion shouldn't be.
<11> I doubt she would have sat silently, personally, but that's just my guess.
<9> Show me where it backs up your this claim: [09:53] <5> COmet it is common knowledge that Bush asked all the attendees of his campaign speeches to swear they were republicans.
<9> that is a downright falsehood
<5> Still aren't you the one that want people banned from your school sponsered church groups because they "might be disruptive?"
<9> sintient they were protestors
<3> sint: you aren't fast
<11> o_O
<3> you just obfuscate
<9> remove the *might* from the equasion
<5> Not really.
<9> egad
<9> talk about denial
<5> You said no gays in your christian group because they might want to disrupt it.
<5> We weren't talking about kids who did disrupt it just kids that you thought had an agenda.
<5> Talk about prejudicec.
<9> sintient you still have not addressed your statement that it was common knowledge that bush forced people to swear they were republicans in order to attend.
<8> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31019-2004Jul31.html
<8> The Albuquerque Journal reported on Friday that people seeking tickets to the Cheney event who could not be identified as GOP partisans -- contributors or volunteers -- were told they could not receive tickets unless they signed an endorsement form saying "I, (full name) . . . do herby (sic) endorse George W. Bush for reelection of the United States." The form warns that signers "are consenting to use and release of your name by Bush-Cheney a
<5> It was to me.
<5> Darthbug knows it too.
<5> You admit to not reading the news very much.
<8> The paper quoted a Republican official saying a "Democrat operative group" was trying to infiltrate the limited-seating event -- although the party apparently turned away uncommitted voters who simply wanted to hear Cheney speak.
<4> I know the media loves to project Donkey tendencies to Republicans.
<1> At a closed campaign event Kerry joked "I want to just make certain that nobody here had to sign a loyalty oath to get in, right?" Kerry asked during a stop in Tipton last week. "This is a genuine open audience of Iowans, right?"
<5> I have other things to do, look I proved people were removed for just buttons and shirts.
<9> sintient you still have not addressed your statement that it was common knowledge that bush forced people to swear they were republicans in order to attend. Were you basing it on rhetoric you picked up at Dem. Underground?
<5> Not even saying anything.
<1> Ronayne said no such loyalty oaths are required by those attending Bush events in Iowa. "The only paper that is distributed at these events for people to sign entirely at their own discretion is a volunteer form," he said.
<5> You can repeat it more it doesn't negate all the other facts and your denial of lots of evidence.
<3> ltr moron
<8> Sintient: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31019-2004Jul31.html
<9> sintent you have proven zilch. All you did was show that he was having protestors removed.
<8> Sintient: of course, i'm sure they'll use the "The washing post is a liberal rag" as an excuse to dismiss the article
<4> we do Know all Bush Protestors are Donkeys.
<4> Whats amusing is, Donkeys say all kinds of things about Bush, call him names, make **** up, say he lied, and then wonder why they are not allowed to go to the public events.
<4> its ironic.
<4> I dig irony, keep it up
<10> hee ****ing haw
<1> wait til Hillary gets protested
<4> after all, these are the same people who have no shame, even at a funeral.
<4> Famous Person dies? just another chance for the Donkeys to get some face time and bitch about Bush.
<4> thats sad. I'd eject you ***holes to.
<1> Hillary has a habit of showing up in Binghamton every now and then, but normally she is never in ANY public forum where anyone can protest her
<9> Well, they pick up this rhetoric at Dem. Underground and where it is never challenged .. and in fact is hailed as great brilliance. Then when they bring it here .. they are shocked to think that it is not accepted on face value.
<2> Ah yes, #politics, bastion of truth.
<1> Comet, well yah know the Civil Liberties Union are sooo unbiased and honest in their comments
<1> heh
<4> P_O it certainly helps.
<11> Personally I haven't heard the full story on the Sheehan removal yet... I can think a few good reasons to have her removed, but the 'official' reasons I don't know yet, and am withholding judgement until then.
<2> Glock21, I never heard a real full story either.
<2> And who the **** originated the banner claim?
<2> That's what I want to know.
<4> I read her version.
<4> its posted on Micheal Moore's website.
<2> Yeah, my mom read it to.
<3> darn i can't find it
<2> *too even
<9> PO .. right .. we shouldn't challenge statements like: [09:36] <8> in front of a friendly, handpicked and screened audience or [09:53] <5> COmet it is common knowledge that Bush asked all the attendees of his campaign speeches to swear they were republicans. ????
<11> Given her past behavior I'd ***ume that she intended to disrupt the proceedings... but whether the capital police had any proof of this or not or if she did something to warrant far more action than the congressman's wife... beats me.
<3> this pic of Bush laughing w/ hillary about to throw her in front of a train
<2> CometBaby, I was simply making fun of how you were speaking, I'm not disagreeing with you.
<9> PO .. you think all of that should be accepted on face value?
<12> Whats the difference between Love and Herpes?
<12> Herpes IS forever
<2> CryHavoc, causality.
<2> :P
<11> Saying it is 'common knowledge' doesn't negate the need to show it. Lots of people come here and claim it is common knowledge that the jews did 9/11.
<9> PO I never made a claim that the channel was a "bastion of truth". So why pretend I did?
<12> know this rapmaster P_O_O
<2> CometBaby, I never said you did, I was making a joke.
<12> doomdoomdoom......
<1> Glock in my mind she is obcessed with Bush, and a profile of her by Secret service would deem her a reasonable threat to the president, IMHO, as I said earlier, people with less of a obcessive profile than her have ***asinated presidents in the past
<4> The three, who are members of the Denver Progressives (search) political activist group, did have T-shirts tucked under their business attire calling for Bush to stop the lies, but a plan to brandish them during the program had been abandoned earlier and the shirts never saw the light of day, Recht said.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#nhl
#heroin
#beginner
indentationerror unindent does not match
#politics
#hardware
#beginner
#beginner
#hardware
|
|