| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57
Comments:
<0> Or, you can admit to everybody that you're out of control and you can seek retribution and kick that user.
<1> hopefully an op will use it =)
<2> i'm sitting here in a robe half paying attention half watching 'charmed'
<0> That is for out of control people that have insufficient power in life, Hemi.
<3> at one point I would have exercised that option JEGA...
<4> JegaPRIME, you should stop now and admit you have no way of knowing the emotional state of anyone in this room but maybe your self.
<3> but no can do anymore...
<2> jega thinks he has some divine ability to tell if somebody is angry by looking at some text on a screen
<5> JegaPRIME: get a ****ing clue.../ignore is for pussies like yourself!
<0> Well, the things we type are indicative of our emotional state.
<2> another fallacy
<3> not for any in this room
<0> When people say insults and such it is an indicator that they're angry.
<4> No it's not.
<2> jega: all people have illustrated is that they don't agree with your retarded arguments
<4> Not for people in here.
<2> sure, they've insulted you
<4> People in here insult all the god damn time.
<2> but we're far from angry
<0> Have fun being angry, Suna.:)
<1> Jega, so authors of books who incorporate anger into them are exercising anger?
<2> i guarantee nobody is here gritting their teeth
<2> about to trhow a brick through a wall
<2> like you are suggesting
<0> Probably not.
<2> i'd bet my savings that you have not made anybody angry, everyone is just thinking you're stupid
<0> But that is not what was done here.
<3> is not angry at all...
<1> what ability has god given you to understand the emotional state of another in an irc chat room?
<2> and is not in any emotional state significantly different than they were a half hour ago
<0> There is no god.
<2> maybe more anonyed
<2> but not angry
<3> no not even annoyed,...
<2> it's almost as if anonying people anony people
<2> imagine that
<2> :)
<6> nice funeral
<6> with dems trashing bush
<0> But, evolution did allow me to possess certain mechanisms for determing the emotional state of those around me as a means of defense.
<0> It's pretty useful.
<6> a real credit
<2> thebarry: yah that was pretty bull****ty
<2> I mean I don't like bush at all
<3> its hard to be annoyed or angry with someone that goes unarmed to a debate channel
<2> but I did not wanna see that
<4> JegaPRIME, it doesn't apply to the internet.
<2> that was just ****ing stupid
<7> no surprise
<0> Why doesn't it?
<7> dems have zero cl***
<0> Cry, why do you say unarmed?
<0> What consitutes an arm in this place?
<4> People judge emotions by body language and the TONE in which they speak
<0> Adminship?
<4> Both of those bits of information is denied all of us in this medium.
<6> dems constantly snatch defeat from the jaws of victory
<2> po is right prime
<6> this is another example
<1> Jega, those AROUND you, as in physically present, no one here is physically in your presence
<2> if i was talking to you in person
<3> because you have no argument JEGA...and your sniping earlier confirmed my supposition
<2> you wouldn't call me angry
<0> Around me as defined by my ability to perceive, Hemi.
<0> I'm sorry you took that to mean physical proximity.
<2> and cry is right
<6> any reasonable person can racognise that for indecent
<2> you're only doing this because you don't have any argument
<6> recognise
<6> even if youre a democrat you can
<2> sides, you've said you were gonna leave what 3 times now? why are you still here?
<2> if i needed to leave right now
<2> i'd be gone
<1> Jega, and perceptions are oft times wrong
<2> yo uwouldn't keep me here
<2> but we've kept you here
<2> seems you're the one whose worked up
<1> ESPECIALLY on the irc
<0> Well, PO, why would somebody type an insult in a manner which is consistent with being angry if they're not angry?
<6> so once again the party isolates itself by allowing themselves to be defined by the far left
<0> What is the point of saying, Here is my idea and now I'm done, you <insult>?
<4> JegaPRIME, to make you angry?
<1> JEga, thats IamKings nature....
<0> Other than to express your anger.
<2> prime: that's all you did lol
<0> He is an angry person.
<2> you did not present any argument about anything
<0> I agree.
<3> no he did not..
<1> he more than likely was laughing his *** off when he called you whatever it was he called you
<2> you just said retarded things like "justice is just an idea"
<2> as if it somehow made your argument sucessful
<2> when in truth
<2> it destroyed any chacne of your sucess
<2> (not that it was the only thing that did)
<0> Hemi, what did God give you to determine the emotional state of people in a chatroom?
<3> he only disagreed with the logic provided...and when backed into corner started referring to it as straw men
<1> I never stated what his emotional state was
<3> advanced troll techniques
<2> prime: now you're copying what I said to you and using it on somebody else?
<0> When do people 'laugh their ***es off'?
<1> not to mention I have known IamKing for quite a long time now
<0> I thought that was related to an emotional state.
<4> ROFLMAO
<1> `426Hemi he more than likely was laughing his *** off <--- what part of the english language do you not understand?
<3> I execute IamKing Daily
<0> Hemi, are you claiming there exist no implication?
<0> The concept of implication, in general, does not exist?
<4> ...are we really bored enough that JegaPRIME won't be banned?
<0> So only the exact things you say are what you're saying?
<2> po: ops arn't here
<0> PO, I give you permission to ignore me.
<1> what part of the words "more than likely" do you not get?
<2> ooh, you give him PERMISSION to ignore you
<2> wow
<4> JegaPRIME, it's not your speech that offends me, it's that everyone's conversations are focused on you
<0> That is not what interested me.
<4> and not anything of even the level of importance that this channel usually talks about.
<0> And you want that attention for yourself, PO?
<0> Then you should have contempt for these people.
<2> po: it's more fun that some conservative idiot relating self esteem to liberalism
<2> :)
<0> And blame them for their own actions.
<4> Read what I say before you reply to me.
<4> I know you're a troll, but at least try to use your reading comprehension in your efforts.
<1> 1993 - General Motors sues NBC after Dateline NBC allegedly rigs two crashes intended to demonstrate that some GM pickups can easily catch fire if hit in certain places. NBC settles the lawsuit the next day.
<2> <4> Read what I say before you reply to me.
<2> thank you
<0> PO, you're upset at me for what others are doing?
<2> other people are saying the same things I am
<2> :)
<2> usually i'm all alone;P
<0> That's strange.
<0> Talk to them.
<4> JegaPRIME, I'm about as calm as you can get without being dead.
<2> jega: you're the only one who is significantly worked up here
<2> nobody else is
<0> Ask them, why are you discussing things which I consider unimportant?
<2> you implied several times that you were leaving
<2> why are you still here?
<0> The might tell you to bugger off.
<3> P_o that does pose an issue...I agree...
<0> PO, when was the last time you cried?
<2> you implied several times that you were leaving
<2> why are you still here?
<4> JegaPRIME, probably 3+ years ago.
<4> I don't keep a crying journal.
<2> i cried last year
<2> my doggie died:(
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#mirc
#firebird
#stocks
unable to create temporary folder to extract to
realukwomen
#c
how to say druggie french
#politics
did not issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during botnet
#computers
|
|