| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Comments:
<0> MrRod: chicken ****
<1> I wonder when the first Ambien murder defense will happen?
<0> MrRod: chicken **** chicken hawk
<2> MrRod: if you would hear me out and let me explain what I mean outside of my humor
<2> pelase
<2> please*
<3> MrRod.. again those that join the service, esp in this era, know what they are looking at.. and to sit there and say anyone that supports the actions the US might take, has to fight is simply silly ...
<0> MrRod: americans love war, it's more popular than baseball
<3> thats why we have a military
<4> Publius; You want to run a blog while others do the fighting you're advocating. Is that right?
<0> JanetB: Play it again Sam
<5> what good is it to have a military if you don't use it to crush your enemies
<2> MrRod: I want to be elected and be a part of a military committee
<0> e-Hernick: defense?
<3> jhicks... are you gonna be like this for a month now?? hehe
<6> jhicks: which sometimes means crushing your enemies
<5> jhicks: pre-emptive defensive strikes are a good way of crushing enemies, you're right
<0> JanetB: yeah
<3> oy!!
<4> JanetB: Anyone who takes a militant position without the guts to put himself on the line isn't worth a lot of respect for that decision.
<0> e-Hernick: horse ****
<7> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-Mustang-BOSS-429-1969-BOSS-429-CANDY-APPLE-RED_W0QQitemZ4629153743QQcategoryZ6236QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem i deserve this
<2> MrRod: I what if that person knows he would be a poor soldier and probably get killed or hurt his fellow men
<2> ?
<3> MrRod.. I would say that Korea and iran's positions are militant
<0> e-Hernick: you take your lily *** over there and fight, I don't care :)
<4> Publius: Are you physically handicapped?
<5> for example. the six-day war and iraq are both purely defensive wars, where a nation was brought to war by the imminent threat of an evil, evil adversary that just had to be crushed
<0> e-Hernick: those two wars are nothing alike and you offend by saying they are
<3> thankfully we have people who WANT to be in the military! so yes they are better suited to that life
<6> MrRod: go **** yourself...one can take a militant position without being in the military...and not only sound respectable but also knowledgeable and just (depending on the reason for the support of the military action or the military in general)
<5> jhicks: it's actually a sarcastic attack on the premises of the war on iraq
<2> MrRod: not at all, but I am a "thinker". I admit I am not brave enough to go to war with other options,
<2> but if I had no other choice
<2> or this was something like ww2, or nam
<0> e-Hernick: in that case, woohoo!
<2> I would feel obligated to enlist
<4> IamKing: You are right. There's a word for people like that.
<0> That movie actually ****ed very bad.
<4> IamKing: Chicken hawk is the polite term. jhicks has other words.
<0> It was AWFUL.
<2> MrRod: please hear(read) me out
<5> jhicks: I'm thinking that the six-day war is a good example of a defensive pre-emptive strike, and the iraq war is an offensive attack
<0> JanetB: I really did like The Maltese Falcon much better.
<8> ok. we'll only let military members vote.
<0> e-Hernick: I'd agree to that.
<3> funny how you all feel nothing for the military, and there sub standard living conditions and minimal pay.. but now that there is a war, and the stirings of more, you are ALL so concerned about them
<3> heh
<0> JanetB: I hate what politicians do to the military.
<0> They all do it.
<0> Take them off for half-cocked reasons
<6> MrRod: and your unjustifiable disparaging remarks on people who support the military action without actually being in the military as somehow invalid not only makes you a moronic ignoramus but an ***hole as well
<0> get them killed and maimed
<0> and then cut off their VA benefits
<0> Never fails
<0> If Bush doesn't do it his successor will.
<0> Politicians are fulla **** people.
<3> funny, you never heard any complaints about how the military was treated before not though
<2> jhicks: I can honestly vouch for a politician doing the military
<2> damnit
<4> Publius: I read what you said. "I admit I am not brave enough...", "I want to be elected and be a part of a military committee" and we should go after Iran and North Korea. I think I get your drift. I feel sorry for soldiers who have to live with your decisions.
<5> Publius: as a future leader of americans, you are destined for congress - but if you do not fight and earn medals, you will have great difficulty earning the trust of americans. if you serve in the military, not only will you gain great physical prowess, but your chances to achieve greatness in public service will be increased tenfold
<0> Publius: they're fulla **** man.
<2> MrRod: you are not listening to what i am saying
<2> and ***uming
<0> Publius: and if you become one you'll be fulla **** too.
<0> wait
<2> MrRod: stop taking a my humurous diction as my policy
<2> and viewpoint
<0> yer fulla **** already!
<0> hehehe
<4> IamKing: Would you put yourself on the line by joining the military? Have you?
<8> only cab drivers should be allowed to vote on trnsportation policy
<0> nite y'all
<6> MrRod: it is why we have a civilian in charge of our military...it is why the President does NOT have to have a military career in order to be an effective military leader and one that can choose his battles and wars appropriately
<8> well, and bus drivers
<2> e-Hernick: Bush has the trust
<0> US-Male: truck drivers no vote
<8> and, only women should be allowed to vote on abortion
<2> jhicks: haha,m night man
<0> US-Male: friggin eighteen wheelers
<5> Publius: of 37 percent of americans?
<4> Publius; Maybe you need a ":)" if you're joking. Otherwise, it can be hard to tell if you're serious or not. I don't take you to be a troll.
<6> MrRod: I've wanted to join when I was in high school...until I found out that my vision would be a problem in the job that I particularly wanted to serve in
<2> e-Hernick: is the Canadian liberal faith spinning that
<5> Publius: no, those are american news reports
<5> that Bush has an approval rating around 37 percent and cheney is below 20 percent
<6> MrRod: but your inane remarks makes YOU the chicken ****, not those that support militaristic action when they have not been in the military
<2> MrRod: Good point. I am pretty bad at missing missing things online as well heh. I just hate the smile because it represents mockery a lot
<5> so when you say that Bush "has the trust of americans", sure he does - but only of 37% of them
<2> e-hernick: I know you probably like him
<2> so let me help clear this up
<5> you could also ask the question "what percentage of americans who support bush believe that the end times are near?"
<3> not me
<4> IamKing: No. I'm talking about people who advocate military action but refuse military service. It's real easy to put other people in peril. Too easy.
<5> refuse military service?
<8> people who have never been a police officer should not be able to serve on a jury
<6> MrRod: that's just too ****ing bad for you...because that is the way this country legally works
<3> MrRod.. it is NOT easy to put people in peril! not at all
<3> thats another silly comment
<3> you are on a roll tonight
<2> MrRod: I'd like to continue this in PM or when things aren't busy. This is rather important to me
<4> IamKing: Sure it works that way. I don't respect that way of thinking. In the same sense, it's legal to by a neo-Nazi. I don't suppor that or a lot of other things that are constitutionally protected.
<6> MrRod: the top civilian executive runs the military...the civilian reps fund the military and also decide on officer promotions
<4> JanetB: It is for some people.
<9> Publius: he's not going to get it.
<5> what are you talking about, it's a purely volunteer thing. should Publius be forced to join the military just because he wants to serve his country? no! There is far better motivation: he can join the military and get ***igned to a cushy state-side unit, going to a foreign land for a few weeks and grazing himself to get a purple heart while claiming that he single-handedly dispatched many enemies
<5> and do this for political gains alone! think of his popularity if he serves in the military and acquires medals!
<2> MissLaVey: hm, I disagree. I have a feeling he may personally have served or is in the military now heh.
<9> nope
<4> IamKing: Commonly the president has military service. Our current president does.
<2> MissLaVey: besides, he made a good point that I did not indicate I was joking
<5> he did patrol the airspace of texas
<2> and I fall for sarcasm ALL the time
<2> lol
<9> someone in the military, or previously in the military, would not refuse support
<10> im thinking publius could prolly test out of some grunt work though
<6> MrRod: if you wish to compare the person who does not wish to serve in the military yet supports a military action with a neo-Nazi's right to existence, then I have lost all respect for you
<9> "i support our troops" "**** you, go serve"
<2> MissLaVey: a military politician might
<5> Bush's military carreer it is a true military carreer, comparable in honour to huey pilots who fought in vietnam
<8> people who have not been in the military should not be allowed to oppose war
<2> MissLaVey: it is a political point that is entirely valid
<4> IamKing: You missed my point. I'm saying that the constitution protects opinions that I disagree with. That's all.
<8> opposition without sevice.... it's just chicken-dove
<6> MrRod: I my point is I have my constitutional right to call you an ***hat for disparaging people who support a military action when they themselves are not in the service
<4> IamKing: You certainly do. And I support that.
<6> MrRod: you just disparaged all the families of the military as if their opinions don't mean jack ****...they certainly by in large support military actions and wish for their sons or daughters to come home safely
<4> IamKing: What did you want to do in the service?
<6> MrRod: military pilot
<4> IamKing: No, I didn't disparage them.
<7> what did you fly?
<5> what kind of pilot? cargo?
<6> e-Hernick: no, not flying a pregnant yak
<6> combat pilot
<6> not logistics pilot
<5> what did you fly, warthogs?
<6> e-Hernick: I didn't fly anything
<4> IamKing: Few guys who go for that actually do it.
<6> weren't you paying attention?
<5> I wasn't, no.
<7> iamking, my son in law is flying f-15's now
<6> MrRod: yes, big competition
<11> The New Yorker: The Bush Administration, while publicly advocating diplomacy in order to stop Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon, has increased clandestine activities inside Iran and intensified planning for a possible major air attack
<6> yowz||: those would have been nice
<7> think he's going to the 22's next yr.
<4> IamKing: Huge competition. They weed out guys right and left.
<6> sweet
<6> yes, no doubt
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
what does sharish mean
#nhl
#beginner
dwssap
nhl fans hanging duck
#gentoo
winn.dixie gillette fusion razor
#worldcup
#stocks
antec solo case cleaning
|
|