| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Comments:
<0> td-, Pakistan and India said the same thing
<0> td-, China said the same thing
<0> td-, North Korea said the same thing
<0> Everyone claims "Oh its only for peaceful use"
<1> TT, There are always pockets of poverty and lows jobs in the best economy.
<2> no, the evidence is... evidence.
<1> IM talkign nationally
<3> Fre_Trade, are you talking nationwide?
<2> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4756710.stm
<4> Pakistan and India are U.S Allies
<5> its carlyle and rothschild..they will own the nyse and the london stock exchange
<4> why couldnt Iran be a U.S Ally
<6> nuclear proliferation is inevitable
<2> right, and Iran isn't, so they get bombed or whatever
<0> td-, doesn't mean the USA wants them to have the nuke
<1> ANyone besides me pay close attention to the financial news ?
<2> they could be, but not with their current stance on a # of issues.
<7> vap0r420: they already do
<7> yes i do
<7> all the time
<8> Fre_Trade was looking at the SBC AT&T Bell South Merger.
<1> Ive been warning about this for at least a year.
<4> Well, why is the U.S an ally of Pakistan if Pakistan sold nuclear technology to Iran
<6> FreeTrade give link
<4> I dont quite understand that
<7> td-: long story
<1> Baby Boomers are retiring, And by 2015 2 will leave the work force for every new entrant into the workforce.
<5> (Tailor): did u catch that segment?
<4> I'll look for articles
<5> the slip?
<1> We are just beggining to feel the first waves of tight employment
<7> Fre_Trade: good that means we can cut back on government employees
<3> vap0r420, no.
<6> VIENNA, Austria Mar 7, 2006 (AP) Iran is offering to suspend full-scale uranium enrichment for up to two years, a diplomat said Tuesday. The proposal reflected Tehran's attempts to escape U.N. Security Council action over the activity, which can be used to make nuclear arms.
<5> right on
<1> Arcane, that wont happen, they have unions and you cant get rid of them other than Attrition which we can do.
<1> But its not enough.
<4> Tight employment has been great for the U.S in the past
<4> why not now
<7> Fre_Trade: many of these people will leave government employment
<1> There are 1000s of jobs available where I am..
<2> td: because they jailed Khan, and we need them for the war on terror.
<1> 1000s
<7> Fre_Trade: also the fed government can trump a unions power
<1> They are getting filled.
<7> Fre_Trade: really... hook me up
<1> arent
<9> td-,current pres in pakistan, has been pro active in trying to root out terrorism haunts in pakistan. the population pf pakistan might be anti west to an extent, pakistans gov knows the wealth it can gain in trade etc by being pro active in war on terror.
<8> actually really low unemplyment kinda ****s, hard to find good people
<1> are not
<2> and their government is pliant and reasonable; Iran's isn't.
<1> are'nt
<4> Timur: General/President Mussharef pardoned Kahn
<1> So the people where the TheTailor lives should move to california and make double what they make their if they found a labor job.
<2> he may have, but dude's under house arrest, far as I know.
<1> or whatever the shortage is.
<7> I say we perform nuclear tests on kahn
<7> sounds fair
<5> its wonderful how the govt is fleecing vets pension funds
<1> WASHINGTON (AP) -- The efficiency of American workers actually declined in the final three months of 2005, the first time that has happened in more than four years, while wage pressures accelerated.
<1> Americans' productivity, a key determinant of rising living standards, dipped at an annual rate of 0.5 percent in the October-December quarter, while wages rose at a 3.3 percent pace, the fastest gain in a year, the Labor Department reported Tuesday.
<4> Nemes: if he hasnt been pro-active enough, I want him to open up Northern Pakistan to the u.s army
<1> Cost of living is already declining
<3> Fre_Trade, but they won't go to California because the costs there are trple what they are here, or more.
<9> td-, yeah i can dig that, but you have to understand that he has to answer to his electorate
<4> so the only solution is to put 100 mexicans in each house and split the cost between them
<1> Wage increases, as measured by unit labor costs, rose by 2.6 percent in 2005, more than double the 1.1 percent increase for 2004. It was the fastest rise in labor costs since a 4.2 percent jump in 2000.
<4> in california
<9> as well as keeping friendly with the west
<1> This is the beggining of an inflationary trend
<3> In California maybe
<10> Maybe the prices of houses will finally start to come down.
<6> they are already
<10> and will be more difficult to sell, as interest rates rise
<1> NEW YORK (AP) -- Stocks were mostly lower Tuesday as bond yields remained high, government data showed wages rising and a Federal Reserve official warned more interest rate hikes may be needed.
<1> Wall Street was nervously watching the Treasury bond market after yields surged Monday to their strongest level since June 2004, pushed up by investor worries about inflation in the United States and rising interest rates in Japan and Europe. Yields were unchanged Tuesday, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury note at 4.74 percent.
<11> well, time to blast aliens and such
<11> adiose~
<1> wages rising..
<1> Why ?
<1> Tighter labor market, you will see unemployment go to levels its never been in america
<4> how do you figure
<5> more interest rate hikes may be needed.
<6> I thought the problem was not enough workers
<4> so if more jobs are available, unemployment will go up?
<10> I'm confused, if there are not going to be enough workers, how is that going to make unemployment rise?
<12> And now for something completely different. Have any of you seen Crash? Worst best picture in a looong time
<5> lol
<5> confused eh
<5> more interest rate hikes may be needed.
<5> 1+1=2
<13> ya, crash, everyone except the mexicaners were ***es in it
<4> its interesting math, more jobs available, means higher unemployment
<5> collusion
<13> the director is pro driver's permits for illegals.
<1> It seems like good news on the surface and it would be if it was just a temporary thing, But when you think of demographics like what I have described 2 leaving and 1 guy to fill the job its much more dangerous, and Ive been sounding the warning for mid term, not tomorrow not next week But in 5 years and 10 years it will be felt powerfully in our economy
<14> just the opposite
<5> yea..makes sense
<5> its called fleecing
<1> all the bad economic news today is on labor or wage pressure.
<10> Fre_Trade can you explain how more jobs available equates to higher unemployment?
<1> IN fact I need to re***ess my bid for this job I am doing I probably need to increase it to $80 an hour for labor from $70
<5> http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000102&sid=aB30yaL0GkGU&refer=uk Gold Prices May Reach $2,000 on ounce by 2010, U.S. Gold's McEwen Says
<1> Because I bid now and do the job in a month or so.
<5> trade in ur fiat currency
<5> :P
<1> Currency doesnt matter here.
<1> the problem is the shortage of replacement labor.
<4> theres plenty of kids growing up
<4> that can do construction work and such
<5> drones
<1> Sure there are placed like where the tailor lives where people cant work, but if they moved here there 1000s of jobs available all the time.
<15> td...no future in that at all
<4> they'll be happy to do whatever the mexicans are doing
<5> lol
<15> unless you mean the skilled trades
<4> so its ok that mexicans do it
<10> Fre_Trade are you ignoring my question?
<1> And not just here either in the outer suburbs 3 hours away where peoople commute.
<15> Fre_Trade
<1> Where you can afford to live.
<15> who banned me last night??
<1> Cry yeah ?
<1> Cry I have no idea of course.
<15> ok...
<1> If I had I would of unbanned you.
<15> I could not contact anyone :/
<16> CryHavoc you banned yourself sorta... bot thought you were spamming
<1> Yes Guest59
<1> IM not saying higher unemployment, the danger is lower unemployment
<15> not sure when motherboard will be returned
<1> nationally
<4> lower unemployment is a danger?
<8> yes
<4> if your a mexican worker maybe
<10> Fre_Trade, thanks. I guess I misunderstood when you said that this would send unemployment to levels never seen before.
<15> nada i can do about my ident...if it werent for this web thing..i would not be here
<8> td- and if you happen to be an employer
<15> e-hernick is the one that called me a hitler
<1> The Tailor is saying there is no labor pressure for lower unemployment where he is, But nationally which is what we all pay for goods, there is pressures pushing on umemployment down over the next decade to a point where its dangerous to the economy.
<1> Mostly its demographically Caused..
<8> oh thats right, we don't give a fig about what employers think.
<4> maybe you dont need as much labor then
<1> WE had a HUGE baby boom
<1> And we baby boomers had 2 kids
<17> you did, freetrade
<15> Florida is doing beter than national average
<1> but we come from family of 5-8 kids
<8> td- all markets, all sements of the economy require labor.
<8> segments
<5> http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20051019&articleId=1115 Lawyers Against the War (LAW) is claiming a victory in its battle to have George W. Bush face charges in Canada for torture.
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
script table as alter to sql management studio express
#politics
#gamedev
#stocks
#visualbasic
#nhl
#firebird
#nhl
#sql
|
|