| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
Comments:
<0> sorry..
<1> krouton: bull****
<0> that's like strapping bombs to camels
<2> Iran may, however, hand it off to someone who might not care. that IS a problem.
<0> and letting them run loose
<1> krouton: where was all your whining when Pakistan got them?
<1> Or North Korea?
<3> hey
<1> HUH?
<3> darthy!
<4> darthburg: may hand it off to who?
<4> that's ridiculous
<2> Swigert I got all my unlocks!
<3> darthburg: I am now a SSGT but for some reason I received 4 unlocks
<3> darth: cool
<4> handing away a nuke to someone? lunacy
<0> coldfyre!
<0> lol
<0> what's u
<0> up*
<0> i'm too drunk to type
<5> or Rednecks with Monty Python's Flying Circus Dvds.....
<4> the nuke would be traced with 100% certainty. Iran would get vaporized as if they'd launched the weapon themselves.
<1> gimme a beer krouton
<3> I just returned from seeing Kevin Smith live
<0> ajofi... USE YOUR BRAIN, where would we be?
<0> DEAD.
<1> krouton
<4> krouton: from one bomb?
<4> b.s.
<1> they'd only destroy NY
<1> hmmm
<3> darth: I got the DAO-12 (awesome), the L85, the SCAR-L and the G36E
<2> how do you trace an exploded nuke?
<0> i'll be living in nyc as of next year.
<1> . o O (what the confederacy never managed)
<3> awesome city
<1> Newark ****s however
<2> chit
<0> but use common sense my friend.. you DON'T react AFTER we been nuked.
<0> sorry.
<2> i got to fo bed
<2> Night folks
<3> bye DB
<4> first, it would actually be a fission device, not fusion
<1> krouton: I guess you're right. We'll wait until our intelligence agencies tell us it's a "slam dunk" and then preemptively nuke them.
<4> so it's damage is inherently limited
<1> krouton: killing babies is fun!
<1> woohoo
<0> aslong as it's not here..
<4> uranium or plutonium is traceable. it has a unique signature to the technology used to enrich
<4> it would be conclusively traced
<0> it's called survival of the fittest
<1> krouton: Let's nuke Elbonia while we're at it!
<0> maybe you should move to Iran...
<3> why not Freedonia?
<3> Hail, hail Freedonia!
<1> I think you drank too much of the purple kool aid krouton.
<3> or Potsylvania
<1> yeah, Potsylvania ****s
<5> or Dum****istan
<0> man, you're sitting here saying "let's save the babies over there"
<0> and get nuked here
<1> no, i wanna kill babies!
<4> yeah that's what dumb***es like you said about Iraq krouton
<1> kill Kill KILL
<4> turned out to be wrong there too
<4> iran wouldn't use a nuke in a first strike scenario
<1> ajofi: well, they might
<4> haha no they wouldn't
<0> they use it, were dead.
<0> who would you rather die
<0> them or you?
<1> krouton: everybody dies
<1> 1000 years from now none of it will matter
<4> krouton: neither have to die, you're presenting it as though one side or the other must die
<0> not if we hit them first
<4> the premise is flawed
<0> then they just die..
<4> right, when in doubt resort to murder!
<1> ajofi: but it's a righteous murder!
<4> oh yes
<1> from the sword of god!
<4> righteous murder, silly me
<0> If they show any threat... yes...
<0> i say kill them all
<1> jesus wants us to kill babies
<4> so saeth the lorda!
<4> just rag head babies
<0> you think a country would even dare to threaten the USA?
<0> with nukes
<4> the white christian babies can live
<0> or create them?
<0> hell no...
<0> and we live
<1> krouton: no nation is undefeatable
<1> most nations defeat themselves
<3> Afghanistan learned what happens when you harbor some rogues who attack America
<5> without any shots being fired
<4> krouton: pakistan has nukes. why haven't they used them against us? why haven't they shipped a nuke off to someone who would use it against us?
<6> ajofi, maybe they have
<0> you tell me?
<4> why does pakistan get to have nukes?
<4> why does india get to have them?
<1> krouton: here is our defeat: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/
<6> 'get to'?
<4> no one complains about pakistan or india having them
<4> or israel for that matter
<1> ajofi: I ain't screwing with them either, they've all got nukes
<1> no way man
<0> nation debt is nothing.. lol
<1> i'll go bully a weak target
<0> we make money.
<1> krouton: ok, then you pay my part
<0> we print money
<1> thanks
<4> drop a few more bombs on innocent civilians in pakistan and we could very well see pakistan taken over by al qaeda - then the terrorists would have nukes
<0> you won't pay anymore then what you've paid in the past
<1> bull****
<0> the debt will just keep climbing, that simple..
<4> monotizing the debt - great solution
<6> ajofi, those civilians weren't innocent
<1> nope
<1> TheTailor: show me the bodies
<4> right, children weren't innocent...
<1> propaganda
<6> ajofi, how do you even know there were any children?
<7> <4> krouton: pakistan has nukes. why haven't they used them against us? why haven't they shipped a nuke off to someone who would use it against us?
<1> there were bodies of children
<1> no bodies of terrorists
<6> Not according to the Pakistani's
<4> i trust the wide variety of news sources that said there were children killed and the lack of any denial about it
<1> no DNA evidence
<1> wouldn't hold up in a traffic court
<6> ajofi, they also said a cleric rushed all the bodies away
<0> we get along with pakistan government
<0> they know not to mess with us =/
<1> ok, it probably would hold up in a traffic court
<7> Three Words: Abdul Qadeer Khan.
<1> krouton: You mean the Dictator Musharraf?
<1> nice guy there
<1> he's on REAL stable ground
<0> lol
<6> Stable or not, he's there.
<4> Pakistanis increasingly aren't liking Musharraf
<6> ajofi, then why is he in power?
<1> TheTailor: so was Pol Pot
<4> not for long if we keep making him look like an ***
<1> We gave him money too
<6> jhicks, apples and oranges
<4> he's a military dictator
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#red
+actionscript +createchildren +init
#nintendo
#redhat
#windows
Sian Lupe died were
#politics
definiton of felony
shirley Mcdowney
#eggtcl
|
|