| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Comments:
<0> was that slow enough for you?
<1> heh
<2> it is different state by state though heh
<3> there doesnt need to be a specific stattue. thats what the courts are for.
<4> I have been in several states for a protraced time
<1> let me repost what you really said
<5> Fee: recent court case up the road.. guy chased down some punks who vandalized his house.. chased em down while shooting at them.. heh. not guilty
<4> FEMA yep. bribe a judge to decide the law
<2> in NY he would go to prison
<2> 10 years
<4> thats the customary way
<2> attempted murder
<3> nah, bribe a judge to interpret the law.
<2> hahahaha
<4> in NJ last I heard a Supreme COurt Justice only cost a couple hundred grand
<4> I am actually not kidding
<1> the entire discussion was predicated on this:
<1> <1> KoBushi: No, the only time tort law changes is when there are regulating statutes.
<1> <0> wrong :)
<4> the law is whatever you pay it to be
<3> but in Texas you can have a gun in your car without a permit and cap someone that runs up to your car if you feel you are being threatened.
<3> crazy
<1> the order has been retained.
<4> FEMA its called the "United States" for a reason: each State has its own laws and that is how it SHOULD be
<3> agreed pilgrim
<6> Go Seahawks
<2> civil protection should be enforced equally
<4> byll ltns
<5> Has the pre-pre-pre-pre-pre-kickoff-pre-show started yet?
<1> states are allowed their own areas of law
<1> as is congress
<1> There are some things the States have no business getting involved in, and vice versa
<0> I don't think I was replying to that
<3> if i dont like the laws in one state i can use due process and change it or move to a state that has a different law.
<1> the u.s. is not special in any respect compared to any other federal system
<2> An equal application of law to every condition of man is fundamental. <--- but thats just my opinion! =P
<4> I have a really stupid question and I amnot kiddin cuz I do not know: who is playing? and where?
<1> (minus that the powers are not clearly as delineated as they are in some federal states)
<1> like Canada
<0> lemme see if I can find it...
<7> There will be a loser at the Superbowl today, and it will be all Bush's fault!
<3> the powers not expressly laid out for the Fed in the constitution revert to the states.
<4> I know this is the Superduper bowl or something but I have not a clue who is playing
<0> okay... I see, I didn't read yur idiotic caveat saying that except when there are regulating statutes :)
<2> PIttsburgh Vs Seahawks in Detroits superdome
<4> ah
<0> FeeSimple you basically were trying to claim that such law never changes state-to-state
<4> not NO? :)
<1> i said the common law doesnt change.
<1> i said it about 6 times
<0> FeeSimple yet, would contridict that every time you mentioned the subject with an "unlss" or etc
<4> I hear there is a sports stadium there
<1> i can repost each example
<2> pilgrim, i wished it was outside on gr*** and mud, its supposed to snow like hell up there
<1> i only predicated it twice...it should have became clear
<0> FeeSimple so, all such law is identical in every state?
<4> I have never been a (team) sports fan
<2> me either, but i love watching them play in the snow and mud
<4> my sports are fencing, tennis, -anything where it is one on one
<1> Congress has many powers that are not specifically rendered
<1> which is where the problems occur
<4> only team sports I like are politics.. and
<4> war
<1> trade and commerce is a salient example
<7> **** the arena.
<2> I like team *** sports ;)
<7> :-)
<4> FeeSimple and those have been stretched so far beyond the breaking point it isn't funny
<3> i think i know what he means KoBushi. hes talking about federal level common law thats spelled out, not individual state statutes.
<0> FeeSimple I'll restate my general position in perhaps a more clear way... it changes depending on the state for various reasons. Thus why you have differences in how ***alt cases come out in Cali than in TX
<1> pilgrim: exactly...but the stretch unfortunately is maintained through judicial review
<2> yeh Tailor, i hate stupid domes, takes all the fun out of the game
<4> controlling the local animal control regs because the dog MIGHT leave state and that is a COmerse Clause item
<4> stupid
<7> `426Hemi gets oiled up and plays wtister nekkid with the boys from Brokeback Mountain.
<7> err, Twister even
<4> FeeSimple exactly. buy a weasel in suit and you own a new law
<1> KoBushi: and if that is because of statute...that's fine. But if it is because of a higher court decision, that is common law stare decisis at work
<2> heh, I heard you were the stuntman=P
<1> lol pilgrim
<1> Ya, you need more specific enumeration through amendment
<3> its like when driving back from california to texas yer not allowed to bring any california fruit in yer car but when driving from texas to cali they dont give a ****.
<4> it is whatever you pay for
<1> in Canada it is highly specific...the Feds get their *** kicked when they move into provincial matters, and vice versa
<4> California is not a state, it is a handicapped condition
<1> but with rigidity comes its problems as well, the inflexibility to handle unique situations
<3> the common law sez that each state has the right to govern itself in this matter and applies equally to all the states but the state agricultural statues are slightly different.
<4> FeeSimple last time it was this rigid was 1458
<4> a solution was found
<1> for example: in Canada marriage is enumerated to the feds. Thus, when they p*** gay marriage legislation, provinces that are totally against it can do NOTHING
<1> and that is sorta stupid considering most Albertans are against it
<4> oops
<4> 1543
<4> oops again
<4> 1453
<1> lol
<4> I can't type ;)_
<3> but them folks in toronto are kinda wild
<1> go up to Windsor for the super bowl!
<1> people from Michigan call Windsor "sin city"
<1> simply because you can have a lap dance and there is full nudity
<1> hah
<4> 1453 was the last gasp of the Roman Empire
<2> The Danish foreign minister said: "enough is enough."
<2> "Now it has become more than a case about the drawings: Now there are forces that wants a confrontation between our cultures," Moeller said. "It is in no one's interest, neither them or us."
<3> Oregon can have live *** in adult venues now. cant do that anywhere else in the US. cept maybe alaska.
<4> the Turks decided a 1000 year old collection of laws did not fit the current circumstance and decided to amend the situation
<3> but them folks are weird... ****ing exkimos...
<7> pilgrim`, well, before they disbursed with the money all over Europe and Russia
<4> FEMA Chicken Ranch in NV
<1> our Supreme Court just defined lewd conduct as NOT including 1. gay bathhouses 2. swingers clubs 3. private home orgies
<1> as soon as they ruled this, a whole bunch of American companies set up shop in Ontario
<7> pilgrim`, didn't the last Byzantine emperor's daughter marry the Duke of Kiev?
<4> Tailor the problem is, once the peace starts, pencil pushers decide they are in charge, In time they make war a reasonable alternative
<8> breaking news: iran ends cooperation with IEAA
<4> Kiev was the Russ capital before the Mongols
<3> right, lawful private property activities between consenting adults. as if we needed the supremes to get involved?
<4> then the satrapof Moscow lead a revolt
<1> FEMA: ahh, a libertarian!
<1> i can smell it heh
<4> see? pencil pushers...war? it always happens
<8> er IAEA :)
<3> a Constitutional Libertarian... don't confuse me with those other people.... they cont count.
<1> lol
<1> fair enough
<9> Iran isn't cooperating with a Sweedish furniture company?
<9> :P
<7> hahaha
<4> the Romanovs are decended from the last Byzantine emperor, and the Czars used the double eagle of Byzantium as their symbol
<4> so the last heir to the Roman empire technically died in the 20th cent
<7> pilgrim`, now that I didn't know
<10> Romanovs really died out with Katherine the Great though, didnt' they?
<3> being able to read is a wonderful thing.
<10> She was from Zerbst Germany, I think.
<1> okay, i have a factum to write for my soon to be boss...i better get to it.
<7> Wow
<1> once again thanks for the fun morning chat everyone
<1> cya later
<3> yer welcome Fee
<4> the family on the throne in 1914 was "technically" a "baton sinister" line
<0> It makes me laugh when I get emails telling me I could look and feel 20 years younger... why would I want to look and feel 6?
<4> know the ref?
<4> baton sinister in hearldry means a bastard line
<10> Katherine had her husband murdered and had no heirs by him, I *think*
<4> it refers to a bar on the left side of the shield or the section of the shield on the left side
<0> Also, I'm not sure I should be getting emails about breast enlargment drugs
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#politics
#politics
#gentoo
setting up mirc 6.17
panfag
antivirus overrider
ipcop shhd
#politics
multiple intellegance
|
|