| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Comments:
<0> publius: i am searching for the reasoning. perhaps a summary would help me
<1> heh..
<2> ...yeah, i guess i can't.
<3> Rock: 9/11, the war in Iraq, Katrina -- he will not be remembered highly
<4> sorry but true
<1> Bush = The New FDR ... great believer in big government.
<5> aaron -- bull
<4> its just a bad day
<1> Bush, the great spender of our future..
<2> bush will be remembered as a controversial president, but one who pushed for his goals
<6> tortus: Was that honest? It really rang with sarcasm man. heh.
<7> "Republicans have no one", geesh, just because you haven't heard of them doesn't mean the Republican candidates are weak, the only Democrats with a chance to win are Evan Bayh, Joe Lieberman and Mark Warner, if none of those are nominated Republicans win
<0> no. it was honest, i am also trying to make points on a game
<3> When did our party become the party of big govt spending? I thought that was the democrats
<1> occ: bush failed on his big goals. school vouchers, social security, tax reform, etc.
<2> none of that is really important, though
<1> right...
<2> compared to the terrorism ****
<1> of course..
<8> blahhh
<4> im a california democrat...small spender....social liberal
<4> wtf happened
<1> domestic policy doesn't matter at all, it only impacts every single american.
<6> antifed: But he will be remebered for the middle east. If Iraq comes out on top the middle east will be changed forever. If that happens he will be compared with Reagan
<1> terrorism tho, you know - thats a real issue.. honest.
<4> i dont care if two dudes get married...but spending worries me
<8> arnold 08 he will pump you up
<9> you cant have an AK-47 in california. that fact upsets me.
<3> You know what ****s
<4> this **** is weird
<0> yes, i do
<6> tortus: This is a bit more suited for PM
<8> he vill pahhmp *smack* you ahhhp
<3> the republican performance over the last few years has pretty much handed the executive branch to the democrats
<0> i dont do private message
<3> wtf
<6> tortus: Fair enough.
<0> publius: i am your mom
<1> Publius: doesnt excuse him for using the Federal Government and it's Armed Forces as an expeditionary force, using MY tax money to go around buying democracy for a bunch of backwards tribes.
<6> tortus: sigh
<1> it's=its, typo
<7> Democrats will nominate Hillary in 2008, they have no chance
<0> :D
<3> I love how people get beat in a arguement resort to personal silly attacks
<7> The moonbats are in charge of the Democratic party now, the party is imploding
<2> your tax money dont mean ****
<6> antifed: Well this is a philosophy debate hehe. I'd prefer if you didn't tag Bush to it. When people do that a lot of people misjudge it as Bushhate
<2> captain taxpayer :P
<3> the moonbats?
<10> you know for 2 years, I heard.. bush and his war, and handed the white house to the dems
<1> nowhere in the constitution, the federalist papers, the anti-federalist papers, nowhere was it the purpose of the Federal government to liberate other nations for the sake of 'bringing democracy' ...
<1> christ..
<2> of course not
<9> wow. i am glad you have such an incredibly broad range of knowledge Rockfish. especially to make such sweepingly broad over-generalizations
<10> I heard that over and over and over and over... and did it happen? gee no
<3> I bet most of the people in this country would take a moonbat over Bush
<6> antifed: I agree. It does not forbit it though
<0> antifed: also, the constitution did not prohibit the us govt from doing it
<1> you guys get tear'y eyed about how he'll transform the middle east, yet you dont give a crap about transforming your own damn country first.
<3> If Hillary runs, she'll win
<7> Hillary will run and she will lose
<6> antifed: I got no problem with people saying that Bush shouldn't. I got a problem with people saying he "can't"
<0> publius: get out of my brain
<6> tortus: hehe, I said it first!
<0> :D
<3> The Democratic base will come out in droves if she runs
<3> you know it
<11> I hope that whore hillary tries to run for president
<1> tortus: think again.
<11> us men will surely preside over her
<2> ill always vote for the most interesting candidate
<10> Lord, let Condi run... if hillary does, I can not wait for the debates!
<6> Welfare isn't prohibited but it SURELY is not in the constitution. At least not the current system
<2> janet, you're betraying your gender!
<3> Janetb: anyone from this administration will never be president
<7> Yeah, the Democratic base will come out in droves, there's about 30% of the vote
<0> anti: where does the constituion limit the action of the feds in foreign affairs?
<10> aaronx.. you all said Bush would never have a second term too
<3> Rockfish: Not Hardly
<10> shows how much you know
<3> JanetB: I did ?
<7> Condie would win easy if she ran
<3> JanetB: I voted for bush in 04
<10> all of you libs did, yeah
<6> antifed: Well, before we continue can we acknowledge that this argument is between us and the const. Not current interpretation. To keep it away from the spin?
<10> aaronx, yeah like I REALLY believe that
<3> libs? I am a card carrying republican
<3> I just hate Bush
<10> sure sure
<2> i realized recently
<3> I can be a republican and not like Bush
<3> that is possible
<3> I am not a sheep
<7> Another one of the famous "I used to be a Republican until Bush" folks
<2> i got arrested in the same town bush got his DUI in
<6> antifed, tortus: us means tortus, me, and antifed
<3> like the bush lovers are
<11> I prefer to call them republicons.
<11> They hate it.
<10> sure sure, keep telling yourself that
<2> its kinda like we're the same, you know?
<3> I will
<9> i dont understand what there is to love about bush.
<9> a couple of my friends almost died in his war, and i still dont know why.
<2> yes, but you like ****ty beer
<4> damn
<2> and that kinda disqualifies you
<7> You don't know why because you don't listen
<4> daaaamn
<4> and i like sam adamns
<3> Bush is a total failure
<4> adams
<2> of course you do
<6> tortus: antifed: we are clear on the current SC judgment of the const. and that we are arguing from the antifed vs fed point from the beginnings of the nation, right?
<2> ya little ****! ;)
<4> i do
<9> youre right guys
<9> totally right
<4> its good beer
<4> really
<9> i am a piece of ****. you win
<4> it is
<0> as if antifed is going to get in a click. that will nto appeal to him
<9> that make you happy?
<0> he is a rebel
<4> no
<4> its just good beer
<2> sheesh, sam, dont take it THAT seriously
<7> Sam, well the first step to recovery is admitting the problem, congrats
<6> tortus: Not actually. The libertarian party has a lot of people who agree with hinm
<2> im just giving you the business
<9> how about i just kill myself and give you republicans my money? i guess that would speed things up
<3> Bush has given real republicans a bad name
<4> its beer that ****s less than most other beers
<0> i am libertarian.
<0> and republican
<4> really a simple sort of evaluation
<0> and apathetic
<9> you guys know that it isnt always about dems vs. republicans
<4> im a dope smoking liberal
<9> political debate doesnt have to be laced with hate and sarcasm
<0> sometimes, i like the dem position
<6> tortus: I am on your side...you know we have the antifed communist rampant in our party hehe
<3> If republicans are smart ... They'll start distancing themselves from Bush as much as possible
<2> im a dope-smoking centrist
<2> heh
<0> sometimes, i like the really really radical positions
<1> eh, i gave the republicans my vote in 1994' ... now they want my money too...
<0> i am not label happy.
<4> but right now im popping pills and drinking
<7> No it's not all about Republicans vs Democrats, it's usually about Americans vs liberals
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
quotes from notopic
#visualbasic
#hardware
#computers
#computers
#beginner
#sunos
620m +bios
#politics
#stocks
|
|