| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68
Comments:
<0> during the days, the democrats racked up record deficits and spending per capita, no they're whining
<0> now
<1> if mccain and guliani are running in 08 primaries, maybe the gop will implode
<2> thats the fun of fiat currency.....you can pull out whatever numbers you wish...and print enough money to cover it
<3> the_BUS, don't worry, if the spending gets to high Dems eill get into office and tas the middle cl*** to pay it off, remember, the rich buy them too :-)
<4> democrats are the biggest ****ing hypocrites on the planet, plain and simple
<1> christine todd says its her party TOO!
<0> because they're not the ones getting credit from the voters for the pork any more
<5> yeah you can have a "daffuhzit" unless it's for a war in which you were attacked
<5> then it's bad
<2> Todd would be intereting GOP candidate
<4> lets not forget that hte reason we have these deficits is because Clinton left our country vulnerable to attack
<3> the_BUS, who are the Democrats going to run in '08?
<5> or more accurately "war effort"
<4> freakin scum bag he is
<2> she is a fiscal conservative
<1> the religious right would have none of her or mccain or guliani
<2> TT Hillary Greeley :)
<6> Yeah Democrats don't have the answer either...
<1> id like to see warner or richardson
<0> Bus: you were watching Colbert Report?
<5> how come the_BUS is always late ?
<2> dems have the answer....tax it
<0> heh ... the Bus watches Colbert
<5> cause it's run by da gubminty
<1> US-Male, underspending on m*** transit?
<5> LOL
<1> heh
<4> Thousands of outraged Syrian demonstrators stormed the Danish and Norwegian emb***ies in Damascus, setting fire to both buildings. Police fired tear gas and water cannons to disperse demonstrators at the Norwegian Emb***y after the Danish building was burned. <--- hahahaha Thos pooooor innocent arabs
<2> Dems taxed it so much...
<4> god i am loving this
<5> the_BUS: "underspending" ?? You're talking about deficits being too high
<1> yes, i did see her on colbert, among other shows
<4> no one deserves to have their **** burned down than freakin Norway
<5> and you want to spend more
<0> Hemi: time to pull the amb***adors out of the middle east
<1> her appearance on colbert was rather late compared to her book release
<2> bbiab....
<1> US-Male, it was a joke
<5> heh
<5> you really believe it ! I'm not fooled =)
<1> well, US funding on m*** transit is rather paltry
<1> not sure busses are the answer though!
<5> well what about the deficit then
<0> Male: it's not how MUCH the republicans spend, it's WHAT they spend too much on
<5> 'zackly
<0> but Bus can't afford to admit that
<5> we just want to spend on different things is all
<0> theBus: I'm sure busses are NOT the answer
<1> they spent too much on rx drug bill that doesnt allow price negotiations
<4> its on local communities to fund their own transportation
<1> for meds
<3> the_BUS, in your opinion you mean, of course, you really don't know anything about it, you are just parroting DailyKOS.
<1> `426Hemi, partly
<4> what the hell do you think this is boy? COMMUNISM
<4> partly MY ***
<7> hmmm I know a guy that paid 150.. a month for a script, under this new policy, he spent 10.00 funny how that helped hi,
<0> they're building new houses across the street from me ... and all the contractor crap they left lying around is blowing sideways down the street and ... bye bye! ... into the SOUND
<7> him
<4> its THEIR city, THEY fund it
<1> fed trans dollars for highways and rails aren't puny
<5> hey I'd love to have a better rail system but that **** costs money
<1> the get fed monies
<4> highways are one thing, and interstate rail is one thing, busses and trolleys and localised rail is the responsibility of the local government and or state
<5> I can still get a train to LA, it's just not as easy as in the NYC area
<0> Hemi: not if the feds siphon off all the cash and then LET the locals have it back
<1> most highways are a combination of fed, state, and county monies
<5> and my taxes would go up by more than I would use the train
<4> or at least SHOULD be
<1> LA is too spread out at this point for m*** transit implementation on a grand scale
<0> Male: rail wouldn't help me ... first you have to drive to the rail station
<4> tahts LA's problem
<5> it would cost more than it's worth -- I can catch a cab a few times per year for less than the tax increase would be
<5> to build a larger rail system
<1> m*** transit will only catch on if americans can still have their own "vehicle" plugged into transit
<5> and the trains are only 3 times per day -- so, how often do I need to go really ?
<8> it's kind of funny the whole "Bush lied" propaganda put forth by people who supported Clinton, who was proven to have lied and admitted such.
<4> m*** transit would be fine if it was privatised
<0> what we need is a way to link up all the cars on the freeway into a train
<0> "the roads must roll"
<4> some people have to stop relying on government cheese
<1> i propose tiny (1/2 the size of golf carts) elec commute vehicles that plug-in to side of rail carrier
<6> Now you're thinkin'!
<0> salstress: yeah, yeah ... my guy's not as bad as your guy ... is so, is not
<6> Public transporation is a must for sure I think
<0> hemi: no they won't ... the gubmint will ALWAYS be there for them
<4> as long as its not funded by the tax payer
<5> OcDoc: you know, I was telling someon that, like 20 years ago
<7> not for me.. I do not want to travel with other people
<0> Male: what?
<7> and take the chance of getting mugged..
<5> OcDoc: wireless communication .... computer-controlled cars
<4> "the wheels on the bus go round and round"
<1> i think itd be cool to have your own self-contained unit so once your hooked onto the train, you could go about doing laptop **** or shaving or whatever
<6> I dunno...I'd rather have a smaller community anyway.
<5> it wouldn't work though but it's an idea
<0> Male: sure
<0> Male: they even have a demo of the system
<5> it could be modified
<0> Male: cars with proximity detectors and over-ride controls
<1> plus at the end of the line you wouldnt have to walk thru rain or snow the rest of way to office
<5> no kidding
<5> hm
<6> So public transportation...even so, it could be _really_ good like the linked cars on the freeway idea
<0> you can take your hands off the wheel and travel at speed limit
<1> that idea is prohibitively expensive as far as I know
<5> OcDoc: only problem is, the cars would still burn about the same amount of gas
<9> yod udes
<9> dudes
<9> hey oc
<8> why is Iran so worried about getting reported to the UN Security Council? why are they afraid of this
<9> he US Male
<9> whats up
<5> unless these were new "cars" which had power coming from the road
<9> energy alternatives today?
<0> Male: what is the fuel savings of a train per p***enger mile?
<1> all the highways would need retrofitting, and they have to deal with merging traffic
<0> hiya Peace
<5> car gets power from the road somehow ... dunno
<9> sal: that is true. why would ANYONE be afraid of the UN?
<1> electric brushes like HO
<5> OcDoc: well for trains you pack all those people on there so it saves money
<0> Bus: merging traffic is a technicality, but it's been proven to work
<10> why the security counsel, wouldn't a strike at their oil production facilities enough to cripple them?
<5> and no traffic stops
<0> Male: only if you DO pack a lot of people on, but let's say at optimum ridership, what is the fuel savings?
<1> US-Male, but would you trust your car at 65mph controlled by centralized computers?
<5> I dunno
<1> id be paranoid
<5> the_BUS: that's the other issue, you would need some ***urance or backup plans
<0> Bus: it's not centralized
<0> each car has the link
<1> that's more scary!
<4> "Every option must remain on the table," McCain told the security conference after Rumsfeld spoke. "There's only one thing worse than military action, that is a nuclear-armed Iran."
<5> peer-to-peer network
<5> maybe
<1> lol
<5> =)
<1> oh
<0> Bus: not any more scary than the elctronicized banking system
<4> we want WAH! damn it WAH! I tell you!
<1> actually
<0> Bus: or a drunk train driver
<1> if each car had electronic sensors for buffer zones
<9> my roommate links to this: http://www.angelfire.com/blog/lbrtyordeth/itsinthekoran/
<1> i gotta go
<1> steelers!
<9> bye the_bus
<3> good
<3> idjit
Return to
#politics
or
Go to some related
logs:
atheist vegan
bambihunt
#hardware
The multi-part identifier+could not be bound
#computers
#nhl
#beginner
#beginner
#freebsd
#windows
|
|