@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68



Comments:

<0> rcane may as well
<1> They are a wannabe rand corporation which is #1 but even Rand is wrong often.
<1> The world does bot believe Iran has nukes, rcane, why do you believe they do ?
<0> Free I'm just saying if they wanted me they can't be that bad lol
<2> who said i got this info from debka?
<3> why do american jews constantly vote left?
<2> FreeTrade: I have sources
<2> poluted: I don't
<1> Poluted, well 20some % vote right
<4> poluted thats funny, the majority i know vote conservative
<1> rcane you have sources the CIA doesnt have ?
<1> I would love to hear your sources
<2> FreeTrade: I may, I may not
<1> Iran does not have nukes, Iran wants nukes.
<3> 20% vote right ... big deal



<5> secret Zionist sources !
<5> aha
<2> you can believe what you wish to believe rwx
<2> that is all I will say
<4> I think they have a working nuke, but they aren't testing it
<3> only the right supports israel
<2> poluted: for perverted reasons though
<1> Poluted, they feat the republicans because they are christians and they think we are bigots, sort of the way martin luther thought of jews when he became a protestant anti semite.
<4> i have no proof or anything but i think they have a nuke
<3> how so?
<1> feat ?
<1> What was that ?
<1> hehe
<4> htey have absolutely no way to attach it to a warhead
<1> feasr
<1> fear
<4> thats the BIG part they have to do
<1> When I talk to jews about why they are democrat 99% of the time the christian right comes up even though they are a small % of the gop
<3> how is the right's support of israel perverted?
<4> the majority of the time i talk to jews who are conservative they mention "Hillary Clinton"
<4> hahahah
<1> Iran doesnt have nukes yet at least noone in the world besides rcane believes they do
<4> heheheh FT
<2> uh huh... no one else besides me
<2> ..
<4> I MIGHT believe they do
<4> no proof but i think they got one or 2
<5> if a Jew is a Democrat mostly because he fears the "chrstian right" does that mean he does't like Christians ?
<1> rcane, kind of like when everyone in the world thought Saddam had wmd you knew they didnt right ?
<1> :)
<2> FreeTrade: actually, I knew he did
<2> FreeTrade: :)
<1> Hey rebec!
<0> Hey Free
<1> How you doing tonight ?
<5> I have nukes
<1> US me too :)
<5> heheh
<6> FreeTrade you set that topic. What's it about?
<7> maybe because the bush administration doesnt really represent anything but texas oil culture?
<2> and anyone who believes iraq never had wmds after the gulf war is kidding themselves
<1> Comet, I had no topic in mind so it was totally out of the blue and I didnt want to say politics..
<7> white bred southerners with a token black
<1> I wanted to say something different ;)
<6> ahh
<6> lol
<0> hey comet
<5> rcane: hell it's diocumented by the UN and Saddam
<5> no question he had them
<3> not voting right strictly because of christians is insane ... many on the right are totally non-religious
<1> Newroses. Please
<4> is there any actual NEWS channel on TV that are just NEWS and not the "O'reilly factor" or "Cooper 360" or whatever
<1> This is 2005
<1> My wife is black and noone cares...
<7> haha
<2> US_Male: really... then why is the administration apoligizing for saying iraq had wmds
<5> rcane: I don't know that they are
<1> I mean there are just not that many racists left.
<2> US-Male: i am serious... why the hell did they apoligize for telling the truth
<1> Racists are a minority in this nation thank goodness.
<5> rcane: because they fell for teh bull**** idea that it was the US's job to "prove" Iraq had WMD



<7> i mean that perhaps the jewish population is better represented in the democratic party?
<7> who knows
<1> rcane I dont think this administration should apologize
<5> rcane: when we all know that hte burden of proof was on Saddam to account for his known, catalogued WMD following the Gulf War
<3> how does the left better represent the jews?
<5> and which he did not do, hence his known, agreed-upon AMD were not properly accounted for
<1> i think the rest of the world should apologize to bush for telling him they had wmds when they didnt.. In truth noone is guilty here.. There was good reason to beleive without a doubt they had wmd..
<5> hence you must logically ***ume he did not destroy any which were not proven destroyed
<8> yeah, those AMD need to be tightly regulated
<5> err AMD = WMD
<1> The former inspectors for wmd had it on thier own books that Iraq still had wmd
<1> the jordanian, egyptian and israeli intelligence agencies told us they had them
<5> and, anyone who canot realize all of that, is a dip**** and probably voted for John Kerry =)
<1> MI5 said they had them
<1> the EU said they had them
<4> Military machines it is
<0> Comet that's the most bizarre quote I've ever heard
<0> how can someone actually say that
<0> guess it takes all kinds, idiots everywhere
<1> It would of been foolish to think they didnt have them given that all the worlds intelligence communities believed they did
<0> Free I think they're in Syria
<1> Rebec, you know honestly, I think they had some.
<0> that's what the convoy was the night before the invasion
<0> Free I am sure they did
<0> There were too many nations convinced for it not to have been the case
<1> Now whether they took it to syria, to iran, to the bekka valley or they buried it in the desert or incinerated it all. I think they had some.
<1> It would of been logical once you knew the US was going to invade to get rid of the stuff.
<5> the absolute dumbest thing Saddam cold have done would be, destroy all his WMD and NOT prove that to the UN, and then pretend he still had them even tough he destroyed them all
<0> Free I agree just because they weren't found doesn't mean they weren't or aren't there
<5> and yet, that's what Kerry et al would have us believe
<4> F, the damn democrats can't have it both ways, they can't claim that we sold him all these supplies, and then claim he didn't have them and Bush lied"
<0> USM well you know Kerry 20 years in the senate and running on his viet nam record, pretty dumb
<1> And even if they didnt have any at all, The chief inspector who did the last inspections said he had found plenty of evidence that as soon as Saddam got the UN off his back he was going to go full speed back into devlopment of wmd
<1> the irony is democrats told bush he had WMD too
<9> hmmmmmmmmm. I just heard that the five churches burned in Alabama were churches attended by mostly whites....
<0> Free yeah and he wasn't american, that inspector
<1> Rebec, yeah..
<7> Do more black americans vote democrat than republican?
<10> byll: did anyone die?
<9> suna no
<1> Obviously noone lied, obviously we were mistaken or saddam disposed of them or got rid of them before we could search the country thoroughly and unfettered
<3> are you an american newroses?
<4> I remember Barbara Boxer up there in front of some senate committee, reading off the GAO accounting sheet listing off all of the chemical weapons we sold to Saddam, in FRONT of Hamid Karzai
<11> hey no evidence of Iraq wmd has been presented, only conspiricy theories and alegation
<7> like wise do more hispanics vote democrat?
<7> no poluted
<7> im just interested
<0> newroses, I believe at one time that was the case anyway...for both black and hispanic voters but I am not sure
<1> newroses, of course, but there is a trend toward more blacks voting republican and independent
<10> ft does have a good point
<10> EVERYONE thought iraq had wmds
<3> by huge margins newroses
<1> there is a lack of faith in the democratic party which is polled in blacks
<10> none of the pre-war anti-war demostrations were people saying 'SADDAM HAS NO WMDS!'
<4> most of it was chlorine gas and agricultural grade anthrax spores that could not be converted to weapons grade material
<11> the invasion was mounted on the back of the pre-emptive doctrine
<10> the original anti-war protests were protesting the war reguardless of saddam's attempt to develop wmds
<1> but yeah 12% of the blacks voted republican and most the rest democrat.. because democrats are generous with quotas and tax dollars but no real solutions to the problems in the black community which I described a cure for last night if you were here.
<4> chlorine gas is used as a "water purifier" and agricultural anthrax is used as a innoculation for cattle (if i recall correctly)
<10> this is part of the reason I don't like being paired with democrats (i'm certainly not republican for damn sure) or any other political group...everyone's so full of ****
<1> The problem in the black community can be sifted down to two words.
<7> suna the original point was to allow the continuation of Hans Blix and UN weapons inspection teams. Anti war protestors wanted to see the proper channels of diplomacy and checks before entering war. Thats to say UN approval would help justifying the war.
<1> Self esteeem.
<4> we actually DID find all those stock piles of chlorine
<4> LOTS of it
<4> LOTS and LOTS
<7> Suna - Also because evidence was found of intelligence reports being Doctored on WMD's we have Hans Blix and several others admitting that their reports were altered.
<1> War protestors would of opposed war no matter what because they hated the bushs
<5> Saddam did have WMD for a fact at one time. If he got rid of them and failed to prove that, that's his ****ing problem
<1> Dont kid yourself or be naive
<5> now he's in jail and on trial
<1> If clinton had of gone to war they *might* of supported it but probably would not of


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #politics
or
Go to some related logs:

#worldcup
#politics
error+tcl+invalid command name 0-9
.znx filetype
#beginner
#windowsxp
#3dsmax
#computers
replacing car locks
(model 8011s-60)



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes