| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> beginnerquestion... to enable ftp for my users only i only have to remove the # in inetd.conf, right?
<1> man ftpd
<0> great answer
<2> sometimes the obvious escapes notice, but in general openbsd manpages are pretty decent at providing answers to the common questions quickly
<3> on the bright side at least they're telling you which manual to read, instead of just to hit google or RTFM
<3> Figz is right though. OBSD man pages are quite well put together
<0> did i complain on the man pages? i asked a question and nobody could say a simple yes or no.. they had to use the most common answer any guy using *nix say... man "whatever"...
<0> its like windows support saying, click next
<2> the long answer is "don't do that".. I can't stand cleartext p***words so anonymous ftp is about all I ever run
<3> Not saying you did. i often come here to find out which manual to read when I don't know what terms to serach for.
<0> so ftpd -n is not a good solution if i just want to enabled it for those few users i have?
<4> tried man ftpd?
<0> tried being helpful?
<0> of course ive read it....
<3> look in to ftpchroot
<0> why?
<3> it'll make sure those users cant get out of their home dirs and thats handy from a security standpoint
<3> also, disable anonymous
<0> i have like 3 friends that has an account which they do something... i trust them.. i just want it up and running.. with no anonymous, which according to manpages -n does.. unless i misunderstood something
<3> great, so you've disabled anonymous. Good call
<3> and if you don't want to limit their acces, then don't just thought I'd p*** on a tip or two
<0> oki.. ty
<1> damn, missed him whining
<5> i'm kill -9 'ing a process but it won't die, any ideas?
<6> probably a zombie process
<7> ps laxww
<5> so how do i kill a zombie process?
<8> you mean a stopped proccess?
<5> 65534 19511 1 0 -1 20 396 4 nfsrcv D ?? 0:00.03 pure-ftpd: -pure-ftpd (IDLE) (pure-ftpd)
<5> that's what i have
<5> it doesn't appear to be a zombie
<5> i've killed the parent (pure-ftpd) (server)
<8> prolly just kill -9 <pid>
<8> I'm having issues with telnet at the moment... I know, sad but true
<5> i've tried that
<5> telnet? what for?
<5> man sshd
<8> telnetting into a bot
<5> ahhh
<5> even worse
<5> what doesn't work about it?
<8> ssh is fine, but for some reason telnet just doesn't wanna work for me atm
<5> your telnetting to localhost?
<5> or are you telnetting elsewhere
<8> no
<5> are the ports open on both ends?
<8> sec
<8> ??(~)-> telnet -l telnet 72.20.42.143 8158
<8> telnet2> q
<8> I swear thats what I used a few hours ago
<5> ummm
<5> why not just use telnet 72.20.42.143 8158 ?
<8> hostmask issues on the bot
<5> explain
<5> -l shouldn't have anyting todod with hostmasks, iirc it just sends your user login information
<5> which in your case your not providing
<5> you'd have todo telnet -l some-user ip port
<8> your host needs to match to gain access to a bot, wheather telnet or dcc
<5> just do as I say
<8> I did, scroll up
<5> telnet 72.20.42.143 8158
<5> i just did that command exactly and connected to your bot
<8> go... to... hell... ;) I swear I had to use the username earlier
<5> not with telnet
<5> and iirc eggdrop doesn't even support the username being sent like that
<5> now could anybody tell me how to kill procs that just won't die
<5> I don't think they are zombies, they don't have the Z flag
<8> I'm too noob to know what a zombie proc is, only thing I can offer is kill -9 =\
<8> I'm in the middle of trying with my limited knowledge, to figure out why I can't chat/.link/.relay the bots on this one server, yet they ctcp ping and do their botly duties
<6> kill -TERM
<5> hey n0cturn, #egghelp
<5> and http://www.egghelp.org
<8> it's the shell, not the egg
<5> it's all very well explained on that site
<5> its not the shell nor the egg, its you
<8> I'm not an eggy noob
<5> n0cturn, that didn't work either
<5> errrr
<5> jb_, that didn't work either
<8> bbiaf
<6> what is the process?
<5> pure-ftpd
<5> and pro-ftpd
<5> there's only one proftpd proc though, there's a bunch of pure-ftpd procs
<5> i've killed both parents
<5> someone would login and list a directory that was over an nfs share
<5> at which point it would lock up
<5> well nfs did, for that one export
<5> actually it looks like nfs messed up somehow, and as a result, the ftpds are locked up waiting for it to return a list
<5> but it's not listing anything
<6> shutdown and reboot
<5> okay
<5> new question
<5> heh
<5> any way to unmount my nfs shares forcefully?
<5> umount -f isn't working
<5> alright find, brb, bgotta reboot the dammed router
<9> woof
<8> moo
<8> whats new seifried?
<8> I started a new job yesterday... I sort working/non-working electronics for a goodwill store
<10> Is it possible to mix and match the -hardened and non-hardened php5 OpenBSD packages, or say I install hardened packages flavors but then I want to add another unlistted module, can I do that without it being hardened?
<8> would someone be so kind as to give me a dir list of /usr/ports, I untar'd a file there and am not sure as to what I can and can't delete, a dir listing would be very helpful
<11> umm u can remove anything.. just untar ports.tar.gz back later.
<8> I know this is a strange request, but it would be helpful in removeing those files
<12> n0cturn: you're wondering if people remove parts of their ports tree?
<8> no, I just don't wanna accidentally remove part of mine while removing these files
<12> removing what files?
<12> ah
<12> i see
<12> i misread your initial question
<12> use find(1)
<12> eg -newer
<8> some files that I decompressed there... that'll teach me to pwd before I decompress
<12> or tar -t
<8> whats -t? *shies away from manning atm
<12> n0cturn: you can examine either the tarfile you extracted (to know what you want to delete) or ports.tar.gz (to know what you want to delete)
<12> read the man page
<11> or 'ls -laC'
<8> =\ ok, I'm just gonna edlete these and decompress the ports tree just incase
<11> rm -rf /usr/ports/
<12> n0cturn: fine
<12> though it'd take you about two seconds to check the man page
<11> then tar xvfz ports.tar.gz in usr/ would prolly be the easiest way for u n0cturn.
<12> knofte: that'd work, but it will also delete his locally modified stuff (if any) and locally built packages
<8> listing and removing the files would be fine and dandy, but thats an awful lot of work when theres 150+ files...
<12> ...
<12> n0cturn: you should be able to do it in a one-liner
<12> tar(1), xargs(1), rm(1)
<8> I could do it in a mIRC script, does that count? ;)
<12> not at all
<8> <- sad
<8> heh
<8> ok, I'll try it in one line, since I have an idea how it SHOULD work (which will prolly be wring, but, live and learn)
<11> lt_kije: no.. locally built packages exists in var/db/pkg's ?
<12> /usr/ports/packages/...
<11> hmm, allright then :p
<8> ok, how do I get the files list from tar to rm? I don't see anything about p***ing args... am I missing it in xargs?
<12> sh(1)
<12> it's called a pipe
<8> oh duh, I thought of that too without realizing it did that
<8> been using pipes since dos 3.0 (or something around there)
<12> if you're not familiar with xargs, do xargs echo or something
<8> so xarge echo | tar -t <filename> | rm -rf ???
<12> no
<8> xargs*
<12> a) i wouldn't use rm -rf until you think you actually know what you're doing
<8> k
<12> b) xargs will build the arglist for rm based on the information from tar; it should be in between
<8> ok, xargs reciever | sender?
<12> c) your tar syntax is wrong
Return to
#openbsd
or
Go to some related
logs:
FEDEX CREATOR
#windows
#photoshop
#politics
#ubuntu
#beginner
#flash
#politics
hack clubyvette
gerrard sucks
|
|