| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2
Comments:
<0> hello all
<1> hello
<0> u use openbsd?
<0> i am trying to find a way i can ...find out which programs are using suid
<0> and
<0> find: -perm: +4000: illegal mode string
<0> isnt working
<2> dee_: man find
<0> :(
<0> a1fa, i already did, :(
<1> # find / -type f -perm 04000 -o -perm 02000
<1> has anyone here tried Beryl with OBSD?
<3> it probably won't run very well
<3> for one, no direct hardware access to the video card
<1> yeah you're probably right. I'll just try it out on Debian instead
<1> or some random linux distro
<1> sometimes it's all about the bloat'n bling-bling
<1> my work laptop is probably the most insecure computer in the world, but at least it's got a really neat screensaver
<0> any 1 know where i can find openbsd exploits
<0> mainly 3.9
<4> dee_ I can sell you some
<0> sell?
<4> yeah
<4> or you can learn to use google
<5> yes sell, now days exploit has more value than gold
<0> you would have to proove it worked 1st....
<4> no I wouldn't
<4> I bet you're dumb enough to pay up front
<4> oops was that out loud
<0> lol , i have been on google, i can only find one that i know would prolly work, but i dont code :(
<0> i said i would have to see if it worked
<0> and i wouldnt pay
<4> no epxloit for you then
<0> lol
<4> senn: actually they're becoming somewhat of a commoditym, prices are stabilizing
<4> plus the legit market is widely accepted now which helps
<5> yes, agreed
<4> it was so funny, when we started buying, holy **** did people get angry
<4> now it's the norm. ah good times
<5> and people called it product
<4> we still do
<4> hey Figz
<6> heya sirfried
<4> close enough
<3> stir fried?
<6> green eggs and ham
<3> heh
<7> win 2
<8> hello
<1> how do I most efficiently brute-force or recover a p***word-protected *.rar file in OBSD?
<9> n3rdorama: rar uses pretty good encryption, so if the p***word is long, you might want to give up :)
<1> hehe ok, but I found rarcrack on SourceForge, so I'll try that.
<1> sven_: I'll give it a try for fun
<2> any hindu people in here
<10> huh? How does that relate to OpenBSD?
<2> Hindu Documentation
<2> geez!
<1> hehe. Jaago Ma Hey Bhawani Jaago Kalikaa
<2> Jagshamesh!
<2> how relevant is some guy getting eggdrop support yesterday morning
<2> i felt like kicking him in the face
<9> n3rdorama: did you look at the source of that program?
<1> sven_: no I didn't. Is it bad?
<9> it seems to rely on the unrar binary, which might only handle rar v2 archives.. i don't know if it's been updated lately
<1> taking a look now
<9> also, it seems to bruteforce by running unrar *for every single p***word* it tries :)
<1> yeah ok. I have the unrar binary present
<9> it sounds just oh so heavenly slow
<1> aha
<1> doesn't sound too efficient :)
<9> not really
<9> but it shouldn't be too much trouble finding the p***word hash in the beginning of the rar file.. i don't know how it's stored
<11> bruteforcing rar p***words can be tough
<2> distributed computing works great for bruteforcing p***owrds
<11> if it is over 6-7 characters and you only got it running on one machine, you might as well give up ;)
<1> aia: hehe ok
<2> aia: not really
<2> aia: these days people got dual core dual cpu desktops
<11> a1fa: according to the speeds I've seen on most machines these days, it is slow
<2> i dont hang around with those people
<2> you must have a minimum x64 to be my friend
<11> zip has weaker encryption, especially the older versions
<11> rar can be really nasty
<2> 256bit RSA
<11> some versions of zip p***words were really bad.. proper p***key could be found in seconds or minutes
<2> 256bit AES.. sorry
<2> the new winzip has 256bit AES encryption.. which is not bad for non-cl***ified and non-sensitive material
<11> yep. these days it is tougher to crack
<2> but with distributed computing.. nothing is hard to bruteforce
<2> anything that takes p***word as input is weak
<2> i am suprised no body released dc trojans like that
<2> who cares about ddos, when you can have dc and do *
<1> I've read that OpenBSD handles ddos'ing very nice
<10> it goes it better than a cisco box, but I dunno about how much better it is than anything else
<2> http://lastbit.com/pswcalc.asp
<2> It would take 600 years to crack my root p***word
<2> 200 p***words a second / 1 computer
<1> janizary: better than cisco equipment? I wonder if there have been made any testing on that.
<2> err.. 100 computers
<10> from experience, though it was a few years back, it was a recent cisco being ddosed and kept crashing, too much information for it's itty bitty brain
<1> We use alot of PIX technology at work, and also clustered Nokia CP boxes, they handle ddos'ing pretty well.
<10> a p3 with 512 mb of ram handled it fine
<1> yes the small amount of memory would be a limitation
<2> Nokia what? 740?"
<1> a1fa: yes
<2> Nokia 740 cant handle more then 1000 concurent connections :)
<2> its piece of ****
<1> I guess we're just lucky then hehe
<2> have you ever seen a nokia at a 100%?
<2> nothing works.. people get dropped off randomly.. you cant clear nat, you cant push policy
<2> you cant do ****
<1> a1fa: no I haven't. I don't work too much with the CheckPoint equipment. I work with Cisco stuff.
<2> you have to wait it out
<2> i like splat
<1> I've never been a fan of CheckPoint stuff for some reason
<2> PIX and NetScreen are POS
<1> POS ?
<2> CP is good if you run SPLAT
<2> Piece of POOP
<10> it's not like **** is a banned word a1fa
<2> i felt like saying poop
<1> a1fa: then what would you recommend?
<2> Dell running SPLAT
<1> I've had good experiences with PIX
<2> I had the best experience with them.
<10> anything but dell
<10> jeeze
<10> pick nice hardware instead
<2> PIX is ok for SOHO, and small branches
<2> PIX is awfull for enterprise
<1> a1fa: ok, I haven't heard about SPLAT before. Will check it out
<2> its Checkpoint's version of RedHat
<2> i recomend R61
<2> its ment for i386
<1> ok
<2> only if you have enterprise tho
<2> its not worth it for small branches
<2> you can use those VPNEdge for small branches
<2> they are much cheaper then pix, and work very well with other Checkpoint firewalls
<2> I got my pf to work like checkpoint
<1> oh you mean SecurePlatform.
<2> FW-1
<1> yeah
<2> p*** log proto udp from <IPSpoof-LAN> to <DNS-Servers> port 53
<2> as in, i dont care what interface it comes from
<2> its taken care of with spoof tables
<2> its useful if you have more than 1 network behind interface
<2> my house has at least 10 =)
Return to
#openbsd
or
Go to some related
logs:
CS SOurce Bunny hop script
+Mulliken +clock
#slackware
#winxp
spoke calc
#red
HaLLuCiN0
#computers
#microsoft
#gamedev
|
|