| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5
Comments:
<0> hello
<1> jaypee
<2> !temp 101 celsius
<2> cajuncook what is it
<1> !convert 101c
<3> 213.8F
<2> !convert 101f
<3> 38.333333C
<0> !convert 1203293022c
<3> 2165927471.6F
<0> OMG
<2> !convert 30c
<3> 86F
<4> haha
<4> just been taking laughing gas
<1> dumb***
<4> Well it doesnt make you laugh
<4> but it makes your ears ring and it feels weird
<1> so what's the point of taking it, then
<4> dunno, it's weird
<4> Aint dangerous or anything
<1> yeah, it only robs your brain of oxygen :P
<4> It's a laugh th o;]
<4> They sell the stuff at festivals legally, so it cant be damaging
<1> they sell tobacco and alcohol legally too... I guess they can't be damaging either
<1> and you don't even have to go to a festival!
<4> Yea, I suppose
<1> Use of nitrous oxide for prolonged periods results in inhibition of the enzyme methionine synthase which is involved in protein synthesis, causing changes in bone marrow after as short a time as 3-4 hours. The enzyme is very important, as methionine, an amino acid, it helps produce is the starting amino acid for all proteins synthesised.
<1> Prolonged exposure to nitrous oxide may cause agranulocytosis, as well as leading to increased plasma concentrations of Homocysteine which has been implicated as a risk factor for peri-operative myocardial ischemia.
<4> meh, first time trying it. Probably wont do it again
<4> So I've got no worrys :)
<1> and yes, I know you're in the UK, but
<1> Under United States federal law, possession of nitrous oxide is legal and is not subject to DEA purview. It is, however, regulated by the Food and Drug Administration under the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act. Prosecution is possible under its "misbranding" clauses, prohibiting the sale or distribution of nitrous oxide for the purpose of human consumption (the recreational drug use market).
<4> It's ilelgal to take for recreational purposes then?
<1> Many states have laws regulating the possession, sale, and distribution of nitrous oxide;[3] but these are normally limited to either banning distribution to minors, or to setting an upper limit for the amount of nitrous oxide that may be sold without special license, rather than banning possession or distribution completely. In most jurisdictions, like at the federal level, sale or distribution for the purpose of human consumption is ill
<1> the group of drug it's in, a dissociative, also includes ketamine, dextromethorphan and PCP
<4> Crazy
<1> hahaha... I got spam from Juan Cohen
<4> lol
<5> ah, yes, it's not legal to huff nitrous oxide
<4> Like I said, first time. Im against drugs but I thought why not
<5> not approved for human consumption
<5> oh, ****, it's fun as hell. i love to go to the dentist :D
<5> don't get me wrong. i just saw the legality of it being discussed, and wanted to add my 2 cents
<4> Well it's legal in the UK :)
<5> i don't like drugs personally, but i'm also against the -illegality- of them
<5> ah, yes, that may be, ok, ehehe
<4> I dont take drugs, but I dont mind other people taking them
<4> Some of them deserve to be illegal
<4> Cocaine causes anger
<4> Heroine just doesn't have words to describe how horrible it is
<5> i think they'd burn themselves out
<5> so i don't think it would be a problem.
<4> The thing I dont understand is that they legalise cigarettes
<5> yeah, and booze
<4> Cannabis is proven to be less dangerous than cigarettes
<4> There's rough evidence that it causes psychosis after long term use
<4> But long term use of cigarettes is 100% proven to cause lung cancer
<5> has booze wrecked society? well, sort of, but mostly in the US, and because of the prohibition
<5> aye
<5> cigarettes kill
<4> It's even on the bloody packets
<5> well, that was forced by the various world governments, eheh
<4> It's now officially banned in england in public places
<4> But that's not really good enough
<5> have you ever smoked/
<5> ?
<4> Smoking results in a LOT of NHS cases
<4> Never tried smoking in my life
<4> I've tried cannabis, and from tonight nitrous oxide ;]
<5> let me tell you something, mate. i smoked for ten years.
<5> they are ****ing addictive. you crave them in your SOUL.
<4> IMagine what it'd be like if the government withdrew them entirely
<4> A lot of people would break down
<5> when I quit, I wanted one so badly that it felt like out of sheer willpower i could manifest one in front of me.
<5> what's needed is quality control. tobacco isn't what it used to be - it's all filler and additives. you know what those do?
<4> i hate the smell of smoke, so it's never appealed to me to try
<5> they increase the burning time, to make you smoke faster.
<5> they increase absorption of nicotine, to get you higher.
<5> nicotine is ADDED, to get you higher. and more hooked.
<4> Cigarettes are legal in public places in the USA aint they?
<5> it depends on where you are and how you define 'public place'
<4> Well you can only smoke on private land in the UK
<5> i lived in the state of kansas, and in my town they banned them in all enclosed public places, bars, restaurants etc
<5> but you can smoke outside
<4> cant smoke in public/clubs/bars, etc
<1> so if you don't like drugs, why are you doing them
<4> Ill try drugs that a weak and not damaging in short term use
<5> now i live in california, and you can't smoke in any indoor public place, nor in marked outdoor places
<4> It's like a cigarette, you have a 0.00000000000000001% chance of cancer from your first
<5> ah, a shot of nitrous can't hurt too bad. it's getting a filling
<5> nothing more
<4> I dont take drugs often, once every two years maybe?
<5> it's when you start doing it often, and so much that your lips turn blue, that you've got a problem
<4> I can easily get hold of any drug I wanted, which is worrying...
<4> Makes you wonder that the government does to combat drugs when someone like me can easily obtain any one i wanted
<5> not much, is the answer
<4> Clearly
<5> besides take tax money and har*** citizens
<5> well, that's what they do around here, anyways.
<5> i think the UK might be a bit more lax.
<4> Our government is in shambles
<4> Every week we're finding something bad about it
<4> Deputy prime minister havign afairs
<5> dude. look who you're talking to
<5> we've got bush in charge... i rest my case.
<4> Practically half of the prime ministers cabinet have had some kind of scandal
<4> Yea, bush is retarded
<4> Strangely enough, I've NEVER spoke to a person that's voted for him
<4> Yet he still won the election..
<5> i'm actually taking a break right now from reading the american bar ***ociation (lawyer's organization) report and recommendation on certain presidential actions
<4> This is his last term tho aint it?
<5> yeah
<4> How long's left?
<5> 2008 :(
<4> ouch
<4> Personally, that's a ****ie law turfing the president after 3 terms
<4> or is it 2?
<5> 2
<4> But still, what if you get a fantastic president...
<5> tough ****, we still don't want a dictator
<5> the first president, washington, refused to continue beyond the established 2 terms though he was asked
<5> one president did, i believe
<4> Yea, Bush is essentially a dictator
<4> In the UK the prime minister has ****
<4> Everything has to go through parliament unless in a state of emergency
<5> check this out
<5> this report i'm reading is about "signing statements" that the president can make when signing a bill to make it law
<5> dunno how much you know about US gov't
<5> summary: house and senate, all elected - each one makes a version of a bill, then they both vote and p*** the one everyone can agree on. they give it to the president to sign or veto
<5> well, the president has been making "signing statements", saying "i'll sign this into law but i'm ignoring parts X, Y, and Z of it"
<5> which is, um, to say the least, completely contrary to our original constitution and everything it stands for, and completely cock-blocks our congress's powers
<5> he's not the first president to do it, but he's the done it twice as much as every other president COMBINED.
<4> lol
<5> the 43rd president has done it 800 times, compared to 400 times for the previous 42...
<5> and not all of those statements done by previous presidents, as i understand, were to ignore parts of the laws. rather they were clarifications or directions.
<5> like "i sign this with the understanding that by 'labor' you mean 'organized labor'" or some stuff like that
<5> remarkably few times has it ever been done to just ignore part of a law "because i'm the president and there are terrorists out there"
<5> and most of the cases cited where it has been done, the statement was later upheld by supreme court and the provision struck off of the bill after it was signed
<5> whew
<5> anyways, yeah
<4> lol
<4> The worlds in shambles really
<5> it's our fault
<4> Nothing works as we want it to
<5> our as in the US's fault
<4> We do it out of corruption, middle east does it out of what they believe
<5> yea, you ever read the koran?
<4> Nah
<4> Never even read the bible!
Return to
#nintendo
or
Go to some related
logs:
dell xps m1740
1941 14th Academy Awards: Best Actress In A Leading Role Was won by Joan Fontain
mysqladmin ping freeze debian
#politics
#photoshop
#politics
#mirc
juped means
#linuxhelp
#computers
|
|