@# Quotes DB     useful, funny, interesting





Google
 
Web www.quotesdb.info
Undernet  |  EFnet  |  Quakenet  |  Freenode  |  Dalnet  |  Ircnet  |  Galaxynet
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9



Comments:

<0> are you a devils fan
<1> chandler
<1> west detroit
<1> east sabres
<0> ok
<1> always has been, always will be
<0> so anyways
<0> elias will get more than 5
<1> doubt it
<0> how can you argue that
<1> how can i not man
<1> in the line they won with the a line
<0> his love for nj is not worth 2.5 million
<1> he didn't demand an ***load of cash
<0> hes got his cups
<1> he'll get more than 2.5 dude



<0> just like johnny damon got his
<1> I"m not saying he'll get 2.
<1> I'm sayingno higher than 5
<1> thats it
<0> no i mean
<0> the love for nj
<0> is not worth saving 2.5 mil
<1> well
<1> for detroit players it is, i dunno how it works for other teams
<1> marty brodeur made a huge ****in message to everyone out there
<1> that he is a franchise player
<2> broly you do know mccabes gettin 5.75 right?
<0> only zetterberg gave you a deal
<1> i dont see any articles, so I dont believe you almo, so NO
<0> what other player gave you a deal
<1> datsyuk has one year left
<1> and he might get traded
<0> do you want datsyuk
<1> idon't care for pavol, i care to make sure that henrik stay
<0> he kind of disappeared
<1> no, because henrik is the face of our franchise
<1> he's the one that stepped up and got 5 goals in 6 games
<1> H'es the one that made it happen, and he's the future of the franchise after lidstrom, datsyuk was useless yet again
<1> he's becoming a yashin in the sense that he has the performance in the regular season
<1> but where the **** are his numbers in the playoffs
<2> McCabe was reportedly after a five-year, $25 million contract, but sources told Sportsnet that the proposed deal is worth $28.75 million -- exceeding the expected $5 million per season McCabe was rumoured to be seeking.
<0> ok
<0> i agree tho
<0> so
<0> lets argue about somethign else
<0> whats 3.75 divided by 5
<0> oh its 5.75 a year
<1> i dunno
<1> where is that article
<0> but look
<3> .75
<1> i dont see no press conference
<2> sportsnets home page
<0> it could be a good deal
<1> how does he get 5.75 man, SERIOUSLY
<0> in 2009
<1> HOW
<0> cause
<2> go to hockey section its the first article
<0> the nhl could be inflated
<0> just look at brad richards
<2> infact
<2> http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article.jsp?content=20060531_134945_4084
<0> BY MORE REVENUE
<1> the ceo's fault on that chand
<0> CUZ NHL IS GUD SPORT TO WATCH
<1> he wanted richards to be an yzerman
<1> face of the ffranchies
<1> that guy must have had too much jack in the box
<1> and got a hallucenation
<0> I think richards is worth almost that thoguh
<0> like 6 mil at least
<1> he will be
<1> in a few years
<1> he'llb e one of the best in a couple years
<0> yeah



<1> lecavelier is just a little too greedy
<0> hes really young
<0> hes like 26
<1> well its more that vincent loves to score
<1> and is a puck hog
<1> we see it time and time again
<0> wtf vinny is the same age
<1> i almost sense that between him and st louis there's friction
<1> yaaaaaaaa chandler
<1> he came into the NHL @ 18
<1> hehe
<1> I think
<0> yeah im sure theres friction
<1> i think lecavlier should go though
<1> he doesnt seem like a team player
<0> he does a lot of individual stuff
<0> but those 3 players did well vs ottawa
<1> yes
<1> but then again
<1> what's ottawa prove
<1> That muckler buying a team dosnt work?
<1> It's never worked, letsl ook at sather's rangers to prove that
<0> they didnt buy no team
<1> ye they did man, don't even lie
<1> wtf did they really need arnason
<1> no, they didn't need arnason
<1> they basically ****in got what they could get their paws on man
<1> and don't even blame ray emory he played brilliant, there's too much star studded talent on one team
<1> heatley will be the first to go, that's my opinion anyways
<0> lol
<4> no alfie is.
<4> he deserves to get the boot
<4> but he wont.
<0> cause hes good bang for buck
<0> like ohlundscute here
<5> =o
<6> the buck was worth it
<6> other then this rash
<5> *!*chandler@*.rogers.com
<7> hahahaha
<5> thank you
<7> you dont even know how to ban
<5> im new!
<6> oh...i thought i was the target
<6> theres a first
<8> ohlundcu, are you hot?
<6> this is irc....all the girls are 23 year old super models
<6> duh
<5> haha
<8> SuicidJky lets try to be no sarcastic for 2 secs
<8> and the question was for ohlundscu
<5> haha
<8> she's on the clock
<6> fine its probably a 40 year old virgin...man
<5> =o
<5> why is everyone burning me today
<8> i asked if you were hot
<8> it is a yes/no question
<6> cuz you never answered his question
<5> well i dont wanna be cocky
<8> it is allowed
<8> this time
<5> but if i say yeah you'll think im lying
<8> that's where you bust out the clever link to your photo
<6> if you say no we will think you are a man
<5> hahaha or not
<5> fine im a 60 y/o man
<5> there
<6> are you hot?
<5> and im gay
<6> are you on lemonparty.org?
<8> ohlundscu this is a serious matter
<8> stop avoiding the truth
<7> stop har***ing the guests


Name:

Comments:

Please enter the result of the sum 63 + 46 (to avoid spam):






Return to #nhl
or
Go to some related logs:

#visualbasic
#politics
#3dsmax
#politics
gentoo bb4 emerge
#gentoo
+lightscribe +windowsxp +label
#stocks
leana77
#beginner



Home  |  disclaimer  |  contact  |  submit quotes