| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4
Comments:
<0> because I think that just might be enough
<0> if the kernel is for the version you're running
<1> it is.
<1> I just want to tune it a bit.
<0> (otherwise you might run into problems with config)
<1> I should probably grab the entire source and do a buildworld though
<1> gonna take forever on this 1GHz VIA
<0> if you grab the entire source, just use ./build.sh tools kernel=MYKERNEL
<1> yeah
<0> or do what I do ;)
<2> change the make option to -01 instead of -02?
<0> do a config -s /usr/src/sys -b MyKernel MYKERNEL ; cd MyKernel ; make depend ; make
<1> hm
<1> I'll try with just /usr/src/sys
<1> but I'm gonna have questions about kernel options :)
<1> is NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY mature enough to use?
<3> I've been using it for years now
<3> no issues relating to that seen
<1> cool
<1> and do I really need all these COMPATs?
<3> if you use them, sure
<3> :)
<3> COMPAT_30 and 20 are handy, and LINUX for e.g. Java
<1> but 1.6? and 0.9?
<3> I doubt you run binaries from that millenium ;)
<1> heh
<1> I wonder if this machine has apm
<4> boot generic and find out
<1> I'm in generic
<1> but apm is commented out in GENERIC as far as I can see
<4> I forgot that
<1> #apm0 at mainbus0 # Advanced power management
<1> I'll put it in and see what happens.
<4> try it
<5> TGEN: are you following the peter-altq branch ?
<3> dsr_: no, I'm waiting for Peter to finish it up :)
<3> aberrant: the BIOS usually tells you what is supported
<3> aberrant: check options, you could e.g. set which APM version it should advertise
<1> ok
<1> -Power management support APM1.2, ACPI
<1> that's what the specs say
<1> guess I should enable acpi?
<1> (is it stable? freebsd puked it up a while back)
<1> w00t
<1> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8188144 Dec 18 2005 /netbsd*
<1> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4340211 Jun 28 16:57 netbsd*
<3> it works here
<1> tgen: did you include APIC stuff as well?
<3> aberrant: I'd have to check, but I doubt it (single processor machine)
<1> cool
<1> APIC's only for MP?
<3> not necessarily
<3> usually, you don't need to configure the APIC on the board, because the BIOS does that
<3> but for MP systems, it matters to route the interrupts the right way
<3> on Athlon 64 systems it's also useful for singleproc iirc
<3> or any system with an nForce chipset from nVidia
<3> for the record, I don't have ioapic enabled, but I do have acpi enabled (and acpi devices, and ACPI_ACTIVATE_DEV, but not ACPICA_PEDANTIC)
<3> an APIC has nothing to do with ACPI, to make things clear :)
<1> ah, good
<1> that does make things clear
<1> they're right next to each other in GENERIC
<1> is there a way to query the capabilities of auvia0?
<3> what do you mean?
<1> well
<3> number of channels?
<1> my hardware includes s/pdif
<1> yeah, things like that
<1> I want to know whether s/pdif out is supported.
<3> I guess the s/pdif out is one of many channels
<3> which, for you to figure out :)
<1> can I query via audioctl?
<3> I'd say mixerctl
<1> do you know what I would look for?
<1> did mixerctl -a
<3> not really. I guess it shows up as yet another line out
<1> outputs.master=127,127
<1> outputs.headphones=255,255
<3> those are all?
<1> that's all I see.
<1> well, I mean, there are about 20 lines from mixerctl -a
<3> yeah, but you want outputs
<1> can I privmsg you?
<3> no
<1> ok :)
<3> ;)
<1> I've got outputs.master, .mono, .headphones, and .spatial
<3> hmm
<3> is it a 4.1 card?
<1> I don't know what that is :(
<1> VIA VT1611A/612A audio codec with 3D
<1> AC97 2.1 compliant codec
<3> 4 dimensional speakers and one subwoofer
<1> S/PDIF output (RCA jack orange)
<1> here are the specs: http://www.gctglobal.com/Products/Set_Top_Box/STB6086N2/stb6086n2.html
<3> yeah, well, I don't think the s/pdif out is any of the outputs you mentioned
<3> and there's no utility to change outputs either, I think
<1> ok
<1> it would've been nice but I guess it's not critical.
<1> thanks for the help.
<1> ok
<1> rebooting - let's hope this works.
<3> as far as that was help ;)
<3> good luck
<1> w00t
<1> ok, everything's cool
<1> bbiaf
<1> re
<1> hey tgen, you around still?
<6> Good night stable daemons.
<7> hello chuey
<8> that's a strange one right there >:}
<3> aberrant: I am now...
<9> heyhey
<6> Good morning daemons
<3> heya jmcneill, chuey
<6> Hello TGEN
<10> hrm, in current /emul/linux has become /emul/linux32
<11> joy
<10> hubertEF: the man page was not updated, apparently
<11> surprise.
<11> remind whoever did that
<11> and ask him to also fix all the packages etc.
<12> reuben- I think that's already on the list
<12> reuben- from you :)
<12> oh /emul/linux is now for 64bit
<12> how odd
<13> morning all
<12> heya
<11> maube /emul/linux is for the native width?
<12> possibly
<11> maybe... just guessing
<12> it was on an amd64
<11> http://kqe.de/pruell/3d-ad-metzger.kqe.jpg
<12> hubertEF- that chap-mail.html is long
<12> and pretty involved
<11> yeah. get all the glory!
<12> I'd have to learn postfix and sendmail to write it
<12> I'm not a huge fan of email :)
<14> email ****s, but fighting spam is fun :)
<12> well, I like email
<12> but I don't like running email
<12> although I'm currently considering a job as a systems engineer on our email platform here :)
<12> which sounds like a cool job, but I just hate mail
<12> but I do like unit testing, monitoring, tuning, etc
<11> email _platform_ sounds ... scary. do you run m$ exchange?
<12> no
<12> hubertEF- we have around six million email accounts, though
<11> wow.
<12> which is a little busy for sendmail on a soekris :)
<11> take a 2nd soekris ;)
<12> probably
Return to
#netbsd
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
blacklisted on mynet.com
oink.me help channel
netverifier pw
equivalent of enum in sql server
#gentoo
tone to pulse lpt300
#sex
#ubuntu
HEAVENSFANTASY.COM
|
|
