| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Comments:
<0> hi all
<1> and in fact, $addtok does that automatically
<2> heh it does
<2> how conveniant
<1> :) yup
<3> sat
<3> here is the paste...
<3> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/uDfNw050.html
<4> you need to actually do a sockread before you'll get into that while
<4> that being said, why 4 times inc %delay if you can do: inc %delay 4 o.O
<3> i don't know
<4> before the while loop, put: sockread %data
<3> that has nothing to do with it though
<3> before the while?
<4> 23:23:19 FiberOPti: you need to actually do a sockread before you'll get into that while
<4> $sockbr shows the amount of bytes read in by a sockread command, but you're only doing it for the first time inside the while
<3> the sockread happens before that
<4> i only see it in your event _within_ the while, not outside it
<3> i know
<3> sat asked me to paste just the sockread
<3> so i did
<4> and i'm telling you, you gotta put a: sockread %data, before the while, inside the on sockread event
<3> ok
<4> btw really bad idea to not name your socket events, it will trigger on any socket you open
<3> well i just asked if that was what you meant
<3> they are named
<4> aka name it instead of putting *
<4> on *:sockread:*:{
<4> not named
<3> i changed the name to a *
<3> for the paste
<4> now try again with that sockread before the while (that doesn't mean yhou gotta get rid of that other sockraed, that one should stay)
<3> i use this sockread all the time
<3> the only problem i ever have with it is this PING reply
<3> this isn't the only script i have with this sockread in it
<4> have you done it yet and tested?
<3> yes but not this year
<4> if somethign doesnt worki, then you gotta debug it, that means for example putting some echo's in that event to do like: echo -a data: %data
<3> i tested it the year i made it
<4> to see if you're actually getting the data correctly itc
<3> and have been using it ever since
<4> i am talking about putting that sockread before the while, have you done it and tested it yet
<3> you just said it just now
<3> i am not sure what all i tried the first time anymore
<4> ?
<2> lol
<3> i just know this was the most stable way of what i tested
<3> you think that will fix the problem if the ping not being sent?
<2> Cascade[]: he is saying have you put the sockread where he told you to and test it out?
<3> i know what he is saying
<2> lol
<4> yet you're not doing it ;)
<3> why won't he answer my question?
<3> i asked "do you think this will fix the whole problem?"
<4> well, this was fun, ttyl
<2> i think the best way to find out is to test it urself....
<2> its one line of code, good lords
<1> Cascade[]: who knows? if you're doing things the wrong way, anything can happen
<3> i have been testing it all day
<2> later FiberOPti
<4> lata~
<3> sat did you look at it?
<1> yes
<3> ok
<1> and FiberOPtics is spot on
<3> you think i should do that and test it?
<3> well i will try it then
<3> i only posted it because you wanted to see it
<1> even if it doesn't make a difference, it will make your script *more correct*
<3> ok, brb
<1> and yeah, your ping reply code is still wrong as well
<1> as you're not using what i told you to
<3> ok
<3> but just so you know...
<3> the script does this before sockread...
<3> : /sockwrite...
<3> on *:sockwrite:mybotsock:{
<3> /sockread %data
<3> }
<1> what the hell?
<1> you're using /sockread from an "on sockwrite" event?
<3> that's what the help file says to do
<1> no, that's not what the helpfile says
<3> but the sockwrite happens in sockopen
<1> so?
<1> *ONLY* use the /sockread command from the "on sockread" event, unless you know *EXACTLY* what you're doing
<5> if i have a combo .. how can i put a value in there ? what did option do i need to set?
<5> i dont want to great a total list.. just show the option that currently set
<3> ok
<3> i just read it again and i must have misunderstood it
<3> i just added that sockwrite today
<1> Amien: what do you mean "in there"?
<3> thinking that was what the help file meant
<1> i told you yesterday how to add lines to a combobox
<5> in the menu .. the pull down is shown .. but only 1 file .. its empty ..
<5> file= rule
<1> rule ?
<5> yes .. that worked ..
<1> you mean line?
<5> yes
<1> hmm and not all lines are showing?
<1> or..?
<5> yes .. all lines are showing .. but when the user didnt hit anything yet .. the combobox is empty .. i want the current value there
<1> ahh okay
<1> you can do that by selecting an item, with /did -c
<1> (after adding it, of course)
<1> (or while adding it, in fact)
<3> sat
<3> should i have only 1 /sockread %data in there?
<3> i have 2 right now
<3> one inside the while
<5> so that will be something like this: /did -c generate 106 $hget(%table,time) ?
<3> should i delete the one inside the while loop?
<1> Cascade[]: 2 is fine
<1> Amien: /did -c, if NOT used with -a at the same time (/did -ca), takes a line number
<3> i put the /sockread %data back in the while loop and it's not hanging anymore
<5> -ca did the job .. tnx again
<1> Cascade[] you should do exactly what FiberOPti told you
<3> now my original PING script might work
<3> i did that
<1> Amien np :)
<1> Cascade[] okay. then what i pasted earlier should work as well
<3> but no one answered when i asked if i should delete the other one
<3> from the loop
<3> i don't know what you pasted earlier
<3> unless you mean the $gettok()
<1> yes, that's what i mean
<3> ok
<3> well i have been using some of that
<3> along with my $replace
<1> yes, incorrectly
<3> well can you tell me once more?
<1> you should not use $replace at all for this
<3> i had to close mirc to stop it from hanging
<1> [20:34.51] <1> if ($gettok(%data,1,32) == PING) { sockwrite -n $sockname PONG $gettok(%data,2-,32) }
<3> ok thanks
<6> ctrl+break will break you out of infinite while loops
<6> instead of having to close mirc
<3> i tried that
<6> sometimes you have to hammer it
<3> but all i could do is switch to other programs
<3> so i closed mirc
<3> i have a fast keyboard repeat rate
<3> and i tried it for about 10 seconds
<3> along with pressing it again and again
<6> ok ok
<5> but howcome -ca works .. and -ca doenst
<5> -ca and -c
<2> c jus checks, a adds the item
<7> hiiiiiiiiiii
<1> well as i said, if -c is used without -a, -c takes a line number, not text
Return to
#mirc
or
Go to some related
logs:
#linuxhelp
discover which motherboard
apache mod_rewrite to iis change port
graffiti fontsT 2.0
#red
Enable Live Preview movie clip preview -component
#politics
#stocks
#politics
#slackware
|
|