| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Comments:
<0> hard to drink with the look of shock on your face
<0> of course, the easy answer is theyre too busy trying to make vista work... or make it do anything useful...
<1> i _love_ the new mac commerical about the PC upgrading to vista.
<1> "If I don't make it, you can have my perephrials"
<2> well
<2> we'll see
<2> i really want this job though
<3> get a real job
<2> is this a fake job?
<3> no
<3> its not a real job :)
<2> what's not a real job?
<3> your job
<2> no?
<3> no
<3> :)
<3> ^^
<2> how come?
<4> cuz you dont have a job?
<2> i'm at work right now :)
<2> i want a new job
<4> ahh
<2> the linux market is hot right now
<4> well if you want a new one, is this one a real one?
<4> ;p
<2> i put my resume on monster and got 10 calls and 10 emails in 2 days
<2> literally
<0> bougyman: lol, totally
<0> there was a good british one too
<0> they just remade them for the UK, cept one
<0> tentacle... and office at home
<5> Hi all
<5> anybody a dab hand at DSL linux?
<5> is there a DSL irc channel on any net that anyone knows of?
<6> when im trying to install xv i get this error message: http://uuoc.com/1700
<7> can anyone help me with an ancient machine?
<8> abacus? eniac? what?
<7> I know the basic CL for any version of slackware will run on old machines, but what version should I get for a pIII (not sure the mhz) with 300mb of ram
<7> 384 mb of ram
<8> I don't do slack, but I'd guess anything will run. your problem will be with a desktop if that's your intent. commandline apps should be fine
<7> i may just go with a new version of slack, avoid x-windows, because the purpose of the machines are going to be remote desktopping to a windows server
<7> how do i check which version i'm using now? I found this computer out in our "dogpen" and it had slackware installed on it
<7> It runs "OK", but it's still pretty slow.
<8> cat /etc/*version*; cat /etc/*release*
<9> hey
<9> central syslog server
<10> he just left
<9> can klog an d sysklod do it?
<9> or do i need syslogng
<7> since you don't use slackware, what version of linux would you recommend?
<9> debian
<7> is there any way to download just the command line part, and not the whole package?
<11> <7> i may just go with a new version of slack, avoid x-windows, because the
<11> purpose of the machines are going to be remote desktopping to a
<11> windows server
<9> l3w: debian offers netinstall images
<11> that makes no sense; how are you going to remote desktop without xorg
<9> its a 32mb .iso
<11> is there a console remote desktop client that i am unaware of?
<9> what
<12> ssh
<13> You can use vnc to remote desktop with Linux.
<7> i thought rdesktop would do it considering you run it from the terminal
<13> I don't really recommend it, but it'll work with enough messing around.
<7> you're right though
<7> it requires the xwindow interface
<7> crap.
<7> bah, i wish xwindows didn't have the same, if not more requirements than XP.
<14> they should make *** toys that support snmp and wifi.. so you can get email alerts.. "vibrator1-ny2: device enabled"
<13> Depends on the implementation. I was running X off of a 16mb flash drive....
<13> DVS01 Dunno about snmp, but they have such things as internet enabled. I'll leave it to your imagination as to why....
<14> haha
<14> i can already think of a bunch of things
<14> and also for the need to clean out the lens now and then =P
<7> well, i'm running slackware 10.1 right now with gnome and x-windows is running decent, but i yanked 3 sticks of memory out of other computers
<13> the way I did it was with a stripped down Debian install and only used it as an X server. The desktop etc. had to run on another machine. (I.e. there was no local desktop)
<8> l3w: cat /proc/cpuinfo should tell you what speed it is
<7> mhz
<7> lol.. 450 mhz
<14> yay i get paid tomorrow
<15> gnome has the big resource requirements, not X itself.
<15> l3w: you could run X on a 386 :/. and people did. :)
<7> i don't like gnome
<7> well, this is my first experience with it. all the previous versions i've used was KDE
<8> cmang: please, I've put those days behind me... :)
<15> then try xfce, windowmaker, blackbox, or one of the other dozens of lighter choices. :) or kde if you are the closet masochist type.
<7> lol
<8> l3w: on that machine I wouldn't run anything more complex than xfce
<7> thanks for the recommendations, definately
<7> so, should i download a new release of linux though?
<8> actually, I'd stay with the older one
<7> so stick with slack 10.1? and just switch to xfce?
<8> not sure waht 11 adds, but with slak not much changes quickly
<7> bah, i'm going to have to redownload slack anyways, because I just found this machine out in our warehouse and i don't know the root p*** :P
<8> I'd try that first. easier than a complete install
<8> or look at xubuntu if you want to change distros and get xfce with it
<7> good deal, should i get a past verion of that/ or a present version?
<8> I like dapper over edgy myself
<10> yeah, but you're weird ;P
<8> true heh
<7> i'm just looking for performance.
<8> yeah, I used xfce for quite a while on an old 350mhz notebook
<7> i can't wait to get home.. i'm putting debian on my laptop
<7> i'm so sick of winXP. i'll have to keep it on my desktop for now because of games
<7> i guess i could get back into quakeII though :P
<8> or quake3 heh
<7> well, brb, i have to go back to my cube and start downloading ubuntu
<16> Does http://pastebin.com/872359 look ok for a small community with ~200 active users atm?
<16> Becuase the machine lags like hell, and it doesnt matter much if i use the my.minimal-template or the my.huge
<8> l3w: be sure to get xubunut and not kubuntu or just ubuntu
<16> 2-4s of latency for the 99% dynamic web site, php5, mysql5, 2 gb ram, 2ghz amd athlon
<8> butchered that spelling
<10> djr: that doesn't sound normal, what's your connection like?
<16> 10mbit
<16> Out 254.2 kB/s 78.3 kB/s 107.7 kB/s
<10> hrm
<15> l3w: instead of reinstalling an OS, you could boot in to single user and reset the root p***word.
<10> that seems like high latency for that set up I think
<16> so the problem is not the connection, not the my.config, not the amount of min/max spareservers
<16> yes
<10> try lighttpd :)
<16> well, most of the site is 0.3-0.9
<10> .3 isn't bad
<16> but it has its flaws
<16> well
<16> ok no
<16> .3 for a board with 80k posts
<16> ~70 page views a day on the site
<10> look at say, linuxquestions.org
<10> that's quite the large forum
<16> ive been surfing around and trying various things. I must be missing some vital piece of obvious **** :)
<10> what forum software are you using?
<16> 4814 TIME_WAITs, KeepAlive Off, no persistent connections
<16> well, its a guy who wrote it from scratch. Its a community with forum and lotsa lotsa lotsa ****
<10> wouldn't persistent connections help?
<10> I see
<16> I understand his code prolly is louzy
<16> ut 60-90% cpu?
<16> :)
<17> how do i make GLcore work? i have an i810 card with xorg drivers, what else do i need?
<12> a miracle
<10> ZING!
<18> PHP-BB ?
<16> 79.8%us, 200 users at community, 2gb ram and 2ghz athlon cpu. 99.99999% dynamic content. php5, keepalive off, mysql5
<16> machine does nothing but mysql and apache
<16> tried to serve all pictures through debians small httpd(dhttpd), minor difference
<18> crazy
<18> something must be wrong
<16> would that be the community php code from start to end?
<18> what is the top cpu usage?
<18> what app is using the most?
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#gentoo
#politics
#feckoff
toecutter definition
#linuxhelp
#freebsd
#politics
what is Memtest8
how to beat the morag tong quests
#politics
|
|