| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> in the suse 10.1 installation (or in general), do I have to make seperate entries for / and /home or can I just make a partitioning entry for /?
<1> ./boot / /usr /tmp /var thats what i usually do,
<0> in the default configuration it just has / and /home...in your case how do you know how to split up the different partitions in terms of size?
<1> i seperate them fairly evenly, all depends on what your doing
<0> do you have to do that or can I just make on partition for / and use data as I go along?
<2> is SCO closer to Unix or Linux?
<0> I don't want to have to repartition because I used more data in /home than I expected ;)
<1> Frazzydee: do as you do then
<0> riznix: will it work if I just specify a size for /?
<1> doesn't suse have an autopilot?
<0> yeah, but it doesn't work...when I resize the windows partition and increase the size of the linux partition, all the linux entries disappear :(
<0> so I have to split it up all over again, or just stick with their size suggestions
<1> you got two partitions on the same drive?
<1> stick with what they suggest
<1> how big are the partitions?
<0> ...but I want to leave more room for the windows partition
<1> if they're partitioned already how can you save space?
<1> you'd just leave another partition
<0> not partitioned yet- I'm repartitioning now
<0> suggested is around 107 GB for windows and 8 for linux
<1> then grab a calculator
<0> *38 for linux
<1> ok
<1> well.. neither machines are going to be on at the same time anyway
<1> and you can use both machines for the same purpose
<1> i gather downloading watching movies, irc, browsing..
<0> yes
<1> so just hack with the two and don't destroy your data on the windows partition
<1> give yourself room to explore
<1> an installation of suse 10.1 isn't going to be more than 4GB
<0> I'd think 30 GB is enoguh to explore
<1> yeah
<0> I want to give it 30
<1> then give it 30
<0> but it doesn't let me resize it to that
<1> thats more than my linux boxen together,
<1> i use a 15GB and a 3GB
<1> firewall and webserver
<1> windows is 250+
<0> wow, huge :D
<0> but how do I resize it to 30...if I use suse's autopilot to resize it it resizes the windows part of it and doesn't create a linux partition\
<1> partition magic in windows
<1> fdisk or cfdisk from a boot disk either linux or windows
<0> but can't I just specify the size of the linux partition again?
<1> if u had already done it, im sure you can
<0> well, I haven't done it with that setup, but suse does it automatically for a 38GB linux installation
<0> the problem is, I don't know how much to give each part- ie. I don't know how big swap, /, and /home should be
<1> swap is twice the size of your memory
<1> what size is your drive?
<1> 38 gb?
<1> and what amount of ram do you have?
<0> drive is 145 GB total
<0> RAM is 1GB IIRC
<1> 110 is windows leaving you say 35GB
<1> ok
<0> actually I'm planning on taking 115 for windows leaving 30 GB for linux
<0> if possible :)
<1> i've never used a swap space of 2GB, as i dont have that much ram
<1> google might be the best bet to get a similar system with a suse install
<1> or a suse howto
<3> anyone using cpanel or plesk in here?
<0> well, suse is supposed to resize things automagically for me, it just doesn't :P
<0> I guess I'll play around with it a bit more though...thanks :)
<1> :)
<4> !paste
<5> tard
<6> hi all
<6> i am installing centos 4.3 on my dell poweredge..but it hangs when it is almost done the "formatting /boot file system" ..
<6> can anyone help me ?
<7> Is there an easy peice of software to configure and setup that lets me burn & rip dvds from the console?
<8> wierd... mrtg says we're using more then 100% of our T1
<8> 1610 up, on a 1.544mbps line...
<9> it's rounding up
<10> hello
<10> is there a way to control cpu usage for certain users in linux for example if a user runs a program that involve an infinite loop where it creates child proccesses using fork the system will crash
<10> any soltuion?
<8> bougyman: 5 minute average tho... and thats ALOT of rounding
<8> it says 205.9 kB/sec
<8> meaning, 1647.2kbps
<8> I think its just doing alot of queueing at the t1 router (as this device is right before that router
<8> or alot of overhead to the router... :)
<11> or it's possessed
<8> I'm not all that worried... we're getting an e10
<12> hello :)
<13> hi
<12> got a question about package upgrading
<12> Preparing to replace bin-8.5.0-i386-1 with bin-10.2-i486-2_10.2
<12> sh: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found (required by sh)
<12> Failed to execute command: [/sbin/upgradepkg --reinstall /var/slapt-get/./patches/packages/bin-10.2-i486-2_10.2.tgz]
<12> i have glibc-2.3.5 installed
<14> did you upgrade glibc?
<14> (you shouldn't, wondering if you did)
<12> i belive i did
<12> it was glibc-2.3.1
<12> slack 9.1 on kern 2.4.20
<12> trying to upgrade to 10.2 and kern 2.6.17
<14> i think that breaks it to be honest. i only recall people around here saying "DO NOT DO THAT!"
<12> lol
<12> is there a way to fix or get aorund?
<14> i dunno, short of reinstalling
<14> you can save your /home dir and /root dir
<8> yea, update your package manager
<8> and NEVER upgrade anything like glibc manually, use your package manager, as it will prevent you from doing that unless it tells you
<12> idle
<12> i was using slapt-get --upgrade
<8> creepy
<12> it gives me that error when i try and run it
<12> after downloading all the new packages
<8> yea, it neglected to update the package manager, which needs an old version of glibc
<12> well, i downloaded the latest slapt-get
<12> what am i doing wrong =x
<8> :)
<15> well slackware doesn't officially support slapt-get last i knew, so things like that tended to happen
<12> =\
<12> hurm
<12> so i shouldnt upgrade my kernel untill i upgrade the distro yeah?
<16> shield: yer screwed homey :P
<12> lol
<12> sup bez!
<12> :)
<16> Not your slackware box. :P
<12> haha
<17> re
<12> how is it messed up
<16> shield: ironic your box breaks too, when yesterday I was explaining to a friend 2 of my reasons for not using slackware these days :P
<12> when i do slapt-get --installed it shows glibc2.3.1 installed
<18> slackware is good
<18> but its not for nebz
<18> *newbz
<16> The lack of a supported package manager was one of my main reasons for disliking it. I loved slack. Even went to install it again, perhaps i was judging a book by its cover, but the installer looked exactly the same as it did in 1995 when i first started learning linux. :P
<17> Qwell
<18> and so
<12> hmm
<16> Though I can't talk I suppose I use debian, which hasnt gotten much better either. :P
<12> so what if i used another distro, would i be able to burn it from here, or would i have to just reinstall windows burn it and reinstall
<12> :P
<12> or boot loader, and do it over FTP
<12> lol
<18> probz with burning?
<12> i wouldn tknow how to burn on slackware 9.1
<12> =P
<18> install cd burning tools
<19> jjshoe
<12> slakjunky: happen to have a link by chance?
<17> sec
<16> sec, retarded client
<17> AHAHHAHA
<17> QWELL I HAVE A STORY but i need to record this **** first!
<19> ?
<17> ok story first
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
bluetooth disabled with gpedit
#stocks
#windows
#windowsxp
walk gay
efnet javachat
#mirc
#politics
pqservice merge
|
|