| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Comments:
<0> wow i am constantly getting "software caused connection abort" ugh
<1> I'm so glad I don't.
<0> heh
<2> =)
<0> please help me with vnc
<3> net
<3> do you use realvnc?
<4> on the linux box is vnc, and i'm trying to use tightvnc on the windows box
<3> cause there was some huge vulnerability in that
<3> bbl
<4> oh
<5> hmmm am i getting packeted or something by someone? ic an't keep an irc connection :/
<5> anyway, im trying to setup my router for vnc...
<5> do i want to forward ports to the server or to the viewer?
<6> netafect: mysuspicion would be the server
<7> hah!
<3> check for icmp unreachables
<3> to see if youre being packeted
<0> i don't understand what is going on, i cannot stay on mirc, does it ****?
<8> i can stay on mirc
<0> hm
<8> are you running latest version? old ones have bugs that get you knocked off easy
<0> yes i just downloaded the 6.2
<8> no idea then
<9> maybe it's the shakey dsl connection
<10> ohh i envy tampa verizon customers... 16mbit
<0> so my vnc problem. where is it? in the router forwarding?
<11> there is no spoon!
<12> vnc problems eh
<12> what about vnc problems
<12> forward ports to the server
<12> the client makes the request to the server
<12> data sent back to the viewer comes from inside the firewall so it is allowed out
<2> What a strange person.
<5> thank you
<2> hey warjest. the precious
<5> lsof -i | grep vnc does this show me what ports are open?
<5> ok can i use netstat and watch port 5901 and see if there is traffic trying to come in?
<12> neteffect: wtf are you trying to do
<12> if you start 'vncserver' on your linux box, it will default to listening in on 5900
<12> netstat tuln
<5> heh! im trying to get a vnc connection working, between a linux(server) box and winxp (viewer) box... i have rhel4 and vnc installed and running server... on the win box it says it cannot connect to seerver
<12> will show you what is listening
<12> you'll see a process listening on :5900
<12> lsof = list open files
<12> find the vncserver app, it's usually in something like /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin
<12> the app is actually just a simple script
<12> you can edit the script and modify the port that the server listens on in the script
<5> ok i did netstat -tuln and i saw the 5801, 5901, and 6001... the ip's were all 0's, both local and foreign, is that ok?
<12> so it's listening on 5901
<5> ok. cool. they are both on a router... a linksys
<12> 6001 is the X11 server iirc
<5> in the routers admin page, i have ports 5801, 5901, and 6001 forwarded. i have both the servers ip in there and the viewers
<12> you don't need the viewers
<5> ok i will remove it now
<12> just forward port 5901 to the server IP address inside the firewall
<12> then, with your vnc viewer app on your windows box, connecto the server as so:
<12> ip_address:5901
<12> connect to that
<5> oh i was doing ip:1
<12> :1 sometimes works as well
<0> hmm i tried ip:5901 didnt work
<12> are you sure you havd port 5901 forwarded?
<12> do you have iptables loaded on the rhel box?
<0> uh no
<0> its a fresh install of rhel4
<12> run 'netstat tuln' and paste the output to pastebin.ca
<0> k
<13> http://pastebin.ca/137737
<13> im on the linux box now there is the netstat output
<12> ok so it's listening on 5901
<13> see how the ips are all 0's is that ok?
<13> k
<12> sounds like the router isn't forwarding properly
<12> yes, all 0's = listening on all interfaces
<13> would you like to see the routers page?
<12> not really
<13> heh
<2> :o)
<12> this is a truly difficult thing to mess up
<12> really, it is
<13> lol
<12> are you sure you're forwarding port 5901 to the proper IP?
<12> ifconfig on the server
<12> make sure you're forwarding to the right IP
<12> and the protocol for forwarding is tcp, not udp
<13> ifconfig on the server, yes i see 192.168.2.103 as the servers ip
<12> hell, forward port 22 to the server, then try and use putty on the windows box to ssh into it
<12> are you at work? maybe they block that port outbound
<12> i've seen that before
<13> no im home
<12> then why do you need to forward ports if both hosts are inside the firewall?
<13> i dind't think i did, but i asked and someone said i should
<12> dood
<13> yes both are inside the router
<12> ps aux | grep vncserver
<12> make sure it's actually
<12> running
<12> there should be a log for it in the /tmp directory as well
<12> something in the /tmp/.X11 dir
<12> i've gotta get back to work
<13> omg i don't see it running
<12> good luck
<13> k thx
<13> well there is Xvnc running
<14> ffs....
<14> I need to update our fscking bind server
<14> stupid thing keeps ****ing its cache
<15> God damn, anyone ever see BIND work perfectly fine when ran in foreground with -g but NOT as a daemon?
<14> never
<14> any errors?
<15> No errors at all, we quadrupple checked every ****ing zone, every include, etc
<15> I'm going to kill whoever replaced tinydns here.
<15> It just completely hangs when we run it as a daemon, loads zones super slow
<15> and doesn't respond to queries
<15> just times out
<15> get rid of the includes with all the zones OR run it with -g, it's fine
<15> Checked every zone one by one with named-checkzone, etc .. heh
<16> does it chroot without -g or anything?
<16> If you're including files that aren't in the chroot...
<2> Praise be to you.
<16> Does it scare anyboody else that he's an op?
<2> What?
<15> Qwell; It doesn't chroot, nope
<15> Qwell; runs in the same exact environment unfortunately in both -g and as a daemon
<11> Qwell: ;>
<11> Qwell: a few people were scared when you became one... a few still are i think....
<16> ;p
<17> i just formatted a disk that is 500gb, came out as 459gb.. even though i set the reserved blockes to 0, mkfs.ext3 /dev/sdb1 -m0 .. did i miss something?
<16> no
<1> 1024/1000
<16> welcome to large HDs
<17> bleh
<16> You lose a lot in the conversion, and also in FS overhead
<17> i got the same size though when i formatted with 4% reserved
<17> should i get a little extra space at 0%
<17> shouldn't
<18> hola
<18> on 32bit system under linux, where do i control per user process memory limit and can it be set to 4g?
<2> welcome to our next contestant, neppakyo!
<19> is this proper cron syntax for every 10 min? */10 * * * *
<20> yep
<19> ok thx
<11> man 5 crontab
<21> Pentium 4d 950 vs Athlon 64x2 4800... which is better?
<22> "better" is a highly subject qualification.
<21> true. but. in terms of technology, which would be better overall.
<23> Cyrix all the way
<21> cyrix, wow, now there is a name that is a blast from the past.
<21> how about the "blue lightning" chip. :)
Return to
#linuxhelp
or
Go to some related
logs:
maharahj pics
#computers
#politics
sexualxac
betterthanbestbuy
#heroin
jfk 3rd gunman
+this computer has been locked
#bsd
#beginner
|
|