| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Comments:
<0> i dont need to think about work tomorrow :)
<1> day off ?
<0> week off :)
<0> OmegaEvil: !!
<1> lucky bastard
<0> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1867155040270429847
<0> hehe a doom mod of hl :)
<0> running on an ipod
<0> woot
<1> lol i thought it looked very doom like
<1> as in old
<0> http://ipodlinux.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4984 look here
<0> lots of games running on the doom engine
<2> hmmm
<2> thats for the photo ipods
<2> ;-[
<0> yeah of course
<0> heh
<2> bah i have to write a script to readd the ipv6 ips ;-|
<3> how much power you think it takes to run this: http://www.slamomaha.com/news/
<3> pwer as in ...pc processing
<3> ***uming it gets incremental traffic
<0> 486
<0> ;)
<4> i would imagine that it is on more than one webserver being load balanced with a db backend
<4> if traffic is decent to it
<0> ElChupey: traffic is the key
<4> exactly
<0> for instance at my work site.. the traffic is such that we run 4 webservers load balanced
<0> before we had a single box..
<4> then traffic changed, increased
<0> the loadavg would sit around 20 during peak hours
<4> so more boxes added
<3> so like ...one box for media...one for forums...one for front side pages ...etc?
<3> 20 what?
<0> ElChupey: the loadavg
<0> type "uptime"
<3> uptime
<0> 1 is optimum
<2> znx they rebooted my core server
<0> er.. on your console ;)
<2> bastards
<0> :\
<3> oh
<2> 234+ days uptime gone
<0> 22:40:31 up 44 days, 20 min, 6 users, load average: 0.74, 0.62, 0.59
<0> there
<3> ;)
<0> see the last three
<3> yah
<0> we were getting 20
<0> instead of 0.74
<0> ie 20x the load expected on the cpu
<5> http://www.parm.net/web2.0/
<3> i see
<4> damn...
<0> most cpu's can handle up to 2 loadavg
<0> thats still "normal"
<0> beyond that you are pushing the cpu
<5> heh
<5> we had boxes with loads up to 16-20
<0> heh
<3> oh
<5> that was considered "normal" :P
<0> square: wtf
<5> they were VPS hosts
<5> :)
<0> oh
<0> biatch
<5> opertrons
<5> oor how ever you spell it
<3> so do you just lose information then or the pc just frys?
<0> we run xeon's square
<5> dual ones too
<0> ElChupey: yeah heat.. not loss..
<3> gotcha
<3> poof
<0> although it can cause catastrophic death
<0> yup
<3> lol
<4> lol
<3> ****ty
<5> ElChupey, same as when windows goes to 100% cpu load
<0> yeah except win doesnt say how high beyond 100% it goes
<0> imagine 100% == 2
<4> the way i normally plan for designing an infrastructure is to plan for 4-times the traffic expected...for scalability sake
<5> yeh
<0> MiRAGE-: i wish my work did that :)
<3> yea that was the word i was looking for
<3> "scalable"
<4> lol
<4> my work didn't until i came there
<4> lol
<0> ElChupey: i would use one box to serve media.. likes of audio/video etc
<3> you need the whole site to be scalable....as in on diff machines ...to help balance the avgload er what ever
<4> took me 4 months to get the tangled web that they had from the previous ready, shoot, aim attitude
<0> another to handle php/web
<3> python/web
<3> but i got ya
<0> mod_python
<0> woot!
<4> for instance, one of my implementation for content delivery system:
<0> ive been playing with that.. it is fun
<3> its cool
<3> just ****s when you HAVE to learn it in a certain time
<0> heh
<4> we have: 16 webservers, 4 mysql replication servers, 6 image banks, 4 streaming servers
<3> i get side tracked easily
<4> that is a short run down on the design...of course there is a lot more involved
<4> just to give an idea of things that can be split
<3> right
<4> my company does alot of mod_perl...
<3> how hard is it to hack / disrupt webserver on linux?
<3> say ...apache
<0> easy as hell
<3> wrong answer
<0> unfortunately
<4> easy
<6> from the inside or the outside
<3> outside
<4> in general easy...with a good admin on the end to keep it from happening...can be hard
<3> im the only employee
<0> you can reduce it .. but you cannot stop it
<6> elchupey: how good is your network and what kind of firewall do you have
<4> right
<0> all you can hope is that you have a fatter pipe
<3> iv e never seen a "how not to get hacked in linux / apache" book
<4> yeah
<4> that is what my wife tells me too
<4> lol
<0> HAHA
<3> fatter pipe?
<4> bandwidth
<0> ElChupey: connection to the net
<3> wheres this going?
<3> ahahahha
<4> lol
<6> elchupey: linux is only as good as it's administrator
<3> i gotcha
<3> true
<0> P38: as is any system :)
<4> P38 is on the money with that statement
<3> osame as windows
<6> znx: that was to be my next statement :-)
<0> hehe
<0> :p
<2> @znx you can reduce it .. but you cannot stop it
<6> elchupey: no windows has some inherent weaknesses that linux does not have
<2> znx using MAC
<2> its hard as ****
Return to
#linux-noob
or
Go to some related
logs:
#computers
#debian
hustlin.allnight.nl
#bsd
#netbsd
starting apmd under openbsd
#windows
#computers
springfield armory Most Wanted T-shirt
caecus tutorial
|
|