| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Comments:
<0> i have a copywrite of that product then? i found it!
<1> copyright delmar
<2> My ADSL should be 3Mps, but I am only seeing 1Mps on my net connection. Any idea why this?
<1> the whole 'connected at'?
<2> Connection: Realtek RTL8169/8110 Family Gigabit Ethernet NIC - Packet Scheduler Miniport @ 100.0 Mbps (Rec: 776.95MB Sent: 369.86MB)
<2> In Network connection is says Speed 100.0 Mbps
<1> okay cool
<1> well.. uhh, have you done a speed test?
<2> yeah
<2> 3Mps
<2> But why I dont see that registering here?
<1> registering where?
<2> As SPEED in Connection Status
<1> well...uhh, not sure..if you're getting your full speed..
<1> might just be a weird issue with the router you're using
<3> what's a good way to clean a lcd monitor?
<1> I use a damp tissue and then a dry tissue
<4> hey guys, i have a quick question (i think). the hard drive on my desktop failed and so i'm thinking of buying a new larger one to replace it, but i'm not sure if the bios on that computer supports 48bit lba for hard drives larger than 137gb. the original hard drive is a 120gb. is there anyway i can figure out if my bios does or does not support this, or if it does not, a proper upgrade?
<1> it's been awhile since I didn't find a pc supporting 48bit lba
<4> yeah, this is a 3 year old dell
<4> so that's why i'm unsure of whether it does or not
<1> and they have the annoying bios's
<1> hmm
<4> yeah
<5> 3 year old is nothing
<6> I have a p4p800 asus m/b and I am wondering what other m/b's I'd need to look to replace it with since this one is faulty. I have a 3.2Ghz processor..
<6> asus m/b preferably, intel chipset?
<5> hah your asus mobo died so you want to go asus again?
<6> I have had Asus M/b;s in every computer I've owned and every computer i've sold custom made, and this is only the second faulty one
<5> out of how many?
<6> over 1090
<6> 100
<5> good amount.. problem with socket 478 is people arnt maken them anymore so you gotta buy whats out
<5> i see a ASUS P4P800SE Socket 478 Intel 865PE = 100$
<5> thatsreally pricy for what it is
<7> whats faster *
<7>
<7> * AGP 4X/8X
<7> or PCI epress
<1> pci express
<8> they came out with pci express for a reason
<9> and stop pasting
<7> oh
<7> k
<7> yeah sorry about that
<8> relax Shadowc4t
<6> BillGates: fancy seeing you in here :)
<9> he was lured here by Jen
<8> lol
<10> So I have a motherboard and CPU that have probably overheated... When I turn the ****er on, there's no POST and no beeps. I removed both CPU and memory and turned it on and there still are no beeps... Sound like a bad MOBO?
<10> ...and what's the likelyhood that the CPU is hosed also?
<8> take everyting out besides cpu, memory, and video
<8> reset the cmos
<8> and try again
<10> BillGates: right on... thanks for the ***istance... Lemme guess, you're a Gates fan?
<8> how can the richest guy in the world not inspire people?
<10> :)
<10> many people are rich because of him, indeed.
<6> I thought that ms would bungle the interface for office 2007 but I actually quite like it..
<6> drumline_: don't forget all the people who are much poorer as a result of being screwed by him and all the people who got rich off of him (not I am not trying to start a war)
<10> networkn: I'm not forgetting at all... I acknowledge that he made it using unethical practices, in many cases... One thing is certain though, his vision changed the way the world viewed computers.
<8> linus torvolds is not the richest person in the world for a reason.
<6> he doesn't inspire me much.. he's actually pretty dry as a speaker.. they should make bill clinton president of MS
<0> how do you prevent dust in chasis?
<10> ugh... Bill Clinton as pres of MS? he'd bone the first intern he saw.
<6> so?
<10> delmar: move out of the desert. :)
<6> whats wrong with that?
<0> i heard women socks can work?
<6> doesn't change how awesome he is at what he does?
<10> delmar: they will help...
<0> is there any dust filter product for chasis holes?
<10> networkn: I'm also not going to start a war... I'll just say that I wont have him on my team. :)
<10> delmar: yes. Check the net... I also think Frys has had them.. They come with a thin black filter material... They mount in front of your fans.
<10> But if you live in a desert like me, you need to clean them very regularly... If not, somewhat regularly.
<0> frys? whats that?
<10> heh... oops.. where are you from?
<0> fry's?
<0> turkey
<10> Fry's is a retailer in the USA
<6> drumline_: do you have a serious issue with him and the BJ thing?
<0> ok
<0> thanks
<6> I am just curious because honestly, you might be the first person I have ever spoken to who does is all
<10> networkn: yep. If the man can't keep a promise and lie to his wife, he can't be trusted to keep promises to other people. If he wanted out of his marriage and his wife wanted him faithful, he should have gotten out. If he had an open marriage, he did a poor job maritally and professionally by screwing around with an intern.
<10> It's similar to some lady having an affair with Husband. The lady's reason is, "but he loves me." My response is, "No he doesn't. He can't communicate with his wife. How in the world do you expect him not to do the exact same thing to you down the road?" And he will..
<6> but I didn't see any evidence that supports that puporting to his professional life.. now you have an illiterate warmongering gnome, who is faithful to his wife
<10> networkn
<10> networkn: I'm not saying Bush is perfect, but Saddam needed to be taken out. It's clear that Bush screwed it up every which way, I completely agree. But the world will, most certainly, be a better place when a democratic process reigns in Iraq instead of a Dictator.
<8> yes all those tear bombs they found in iraq were very threatening
<6> some believe that he also was a part of 3000 people being killed sept 11
<8> and those people he executed back in 2 mmade him a huge threat to the USA
<8> 1 9 8 2
<10> I've heard all sorts of differing opinions on what they actually found. One thing is true though. There were 18 UN resolutions against Saddam and the UN wasn't going to do anything.
<10> ...and then you have Zarkawi saying that the war is against Democracy and that America should should be wiped off the face of the earth. And he made it VERY CLEAR that it was _democracy_ that he intended to destroy. We, over here, aren't willing to give up the democratic republic we have, so there's only one response: "I'm sorry to feel that way Zarkawi. You can have your opinion, but attack us and die."
<10> So basically, anyone putting a stamp of "Al Qaida" on their person is at odds with any country using a democratic style of government.
<6> drumline_: just out of interest.. would you vote for bush if he were allowed a 3rd term?
<10> Even after Spain pulled out of Iraq, authorities there foiled another bombing after they elected communists as leaders.. It's not like the terrorists care. So long as we are infidels, we are to die.
<8> comunism is the answer
<10> networkn: given the choice between him and another non-welfare candidate, I would not choose Bush.
<6> a very small part of the muslim community are terrorists
<8> 'extremists
<6> non welfare? whats that (sorry I am not familar with that term)
<10> networkn: true. And I'm not speaking about the entire Muslim world... Just the terrorists who twist and warp the Koran.
<10> Most of the Islamic world does not support the terrorists.
<10> networkn: by non-welfare, I mean, "candidate that does not support the idea of the state allowing people to sit on the dole when they are fully capable of working."
<6> right..
<6> so bush supports no welfare, and you want another candidate who also supports that?
<6> if you could anyone to be president who would you pick?
<10> Not hillary :)
<10> heh... .
<11> hehe drumline_
<11> *haha
<6> christopher walken :)
<10> I don't know who I'd pick. I think all the candidates that will arrive will be completely eaten up by special interests(which sadly reflects our entire process)... I don't think I'll like either.. However, the people in office reflect what the population is willing to tolerate from them.
<10> Something good about Bush is his stance on guns. Hillary would strip the entire population of every single gun if she could.
<6> i saw a funny thing the other day.. it was talking about what was wrong with the strategy in afghanistan.. we drop flyers, drop bombs and then drop food parcels, and the people scurry around the aid packages.. it would be MUCH more effiecent to drop food, and then immedialtey afterward, drop the bombs :)
<6> drumline_: people don't need ***ault weapons
<6> ***ualt weapons are weapons of war
<1> people don't need guns
<1> guns are weapons to kill other people.. same argument
<10> Well... I invite you both to look at the statistics of the 25 states that recently allowed people to carry concealed weapons on their bodies. In every case, the number of violent crimes decreased.
<6> the most awesome part of the debates between kerry and bush was when bush was talking about rmoving the bans, and kerry just stood, and said, I will not put bigger weapons in the hands of our civilians than our police officers have
<1> drumline_.. because of fear.
<1> if you're afraid to me hurt, you're less likely to try something
<10> networkn: and if you ask Police officers, MOST of them actually want the populace to be armed.
<1> doesn't mean it's the 'right' thing to do
<10> snoops: exactly.
<1> fear based societies are sad ones :(
<10> snoops: look at England. They banned weapons to the point where cops don't have them. And just recently, some perps broke into a courtroom and busted out their buddy.
<10> snoops: It's about responsibility and the ability to protect yourself.
<1> we shouldn't bloody need to.
<10> snoop: Every single court case over the last 50 years has put the responsibility for your immediate protection in your hands and strictly NOT the police. This means that the police don't need to come to your house if you call them. And if you get killed because they don't come to your house, they aren't liable for any losses to your family.
<1> we shouldn't need police either.
<10> snoop: This is exactly why most police officers support armed citizens. Because they don't have to come to the house and find a dead resident, but instead find a dead burglar.
<10> snoops: well... too bad. Perps exist, that's a fact.
<10> snoops: they tried disarming the population in England and it has failed miserably.
<1> it's only a few items..I'd much rather give a burgler my stuff than kill them.
<1> otherwise, you're putting a price on a human life
<1> it's just as bad as the riaa sending someone to jail for 20 years for ****ing copyright infringement, when convicted murders get off with less
<10> snoops: ya see.. That's the wrong attitude to have when it comes to letting perps step all over you. When you give criminals control over your life, they will take your life from you. And your wife's and your children's lives too.
<1> in a materialistic society, sure.
<1> but we shouldn't be a materialistic society.
<1> Life is more important than items.
<10> snoops: hey... check this out. I'm totally fine with respecting the life of other people, but when another person intends to kill me or my family, DO I HAVE THE RIGHT to respond with enough force to stop him?
<1> Naturally..You don't have to kill someone to stop them.
<10> snoops: And when the perp may or may not have a gun, should I be reduced to bringing a knife to a gunfight and potentially lose my life? And then let my kids grow up without a dad?
<6> snoops: the only time i'd consider taking a human life is if my family were being threatened
<6> I know a guy in the u.s with a ****ing arsenel..
Return to
#hardware
or
Go to some related
logs:
#freebsd
megatorrents
ubuntu pymssql
#winvista
esbengronker
#beginner
#beginner
man swap solaris 10
#politics
#freebsd
|
|