| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> bye people
<1> bye, good luck
<2> i think im going to wait on conroe before a new build... the odd multiplier is retarded on the am2
<2> test
<1> I try and skip a few
<1> Im still having fun with socket A
<1> not much of a gamer tho, the occaisional fps
<2> yeah
<1> racing games
<1> flight sim
<2> i gave my p4 system to work
<2> im on an old laptop now
<3> hmm I reckon..middle next year before next upgrade - by then virtualization software like xen should be pretty stable
<2> i cant wait until the new video cards come out
<2> should be either on par or a step ahead of ps3 and xbox 360
<2> should be awesome
<1> the sli stuff freaked me out really.. and all the power supply demands
<1> I decided to let that ****e mature a bit
<3> yeah, it's insane
<2> quad sli is retarded
<3> homemade rigs using close to 600watt psus these days
<3> sli is retarded
<1> yea Im not into sli at all
<2> a crossfire setup beats it
<1> the idea of having 2 graphics cards is just not my style
<1> its grabbing at straws imo
<2> i can see the reason for sli
<2> but not quad sli
<1> Id rather have additional cpu's
<3> it's using the same sense? More money = more power.
<2> i mean.. in order to even get it to run right they had to underclock the memory which is the reason why it ****s so bad
<2> you cant really run many games at high resolution without sli
<1> it would be so sickening to buy 2 really good graphics cards,
<1> then 1 year later, ou just buy 1 card and throw the 2 away
<2> thats the reason why i support a double sli setup
<4> what is sli
<2> scalable link interface... links two video cards together
<4> ic
<2> gives a performance increase of about 80%
<2> over a single setup
<1> expensive tho eh
<1> well actually not that bad
<1> if u dont go cutting edge
<1> cuz 2 of any card would beat 1 of the latest cards right?
<2> no
<5> I'll probably get a 32' hdtv Samsung 3251d lcd tomorrow as my computers screen what you guys think ?
<2> i think GOD DAMN what a screen
<1> I think its too small
<1> sorry
<1> its too small or too big
<4> good nite all
<1> too big to sit right in front of
<4> ved time
<4> bed time
<1> not quite big enough to sit away from and enjoy
<2> hmm
<1> good for a small livingroom I guess
<5> I want to know if it's good, I know it is, just want to know how much : http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Samsung%20LN-S3251D%20Television:1993266187
<1> thats fussy me tho
<2> that reminds me... i gotta get my paycheck
<2> that would kinda **** playing games on sorta tho
<1> I think its cool to be honest, but I do want a bigger tv
<2> i think its impossible to look at all parts of that screen at one time
<1> mines 32
<1> I wish it was bigger
<2> i think tv is 36 or something
<5> so is it good ?
<1> I dunno sorry
<5> 'cause I am selling all my old **** and I pay only 1000$ of my pocket for it
<6> 32 feet.. is that all screen, or does it include the frame? :P
<1> looks nice
<1> lol
<2> hehe joxter
<5> there is a special mode to play game in it, as been created with samsung & microsoft engineer
<2> the resolution on that screen is not the highest available, but from similar sets ive seen in stores, the picture was great. of course it was playing hdtv media though
<5> eneerge well that's what I am telling myself, it will be my computer screen.. and sometimes I'll watch some movies on it.. I'll be at maybe 2-3 feet from the screen
<3> personally I find my 24" widescreen pc monitor perfect for room/lounge viewing.
<5> I saw it live, and the colors look amazing with the new dynamic contrast technology, like I said I am selling all my old **** for it hehe, my 27inch tv, my 2 comp screen etc.. so I pay only like 700-800$ (us $) out of my pocket
<3> hardly watch tv, and that is large enough to enjoy a movie, if I want to watch one
<7> i recently bought a new computer (today)
<5> snoops do you have hdmi on it ?
<7> and i thought it would be good, but it can only play black and white 2 on medium-low settings
<7> and it is being really gay
<7> hey kepler =D
<5> or 1080i ?
<3> nope Kepler. the res is 1920x1200..which is above 1080p
<5> ok
<3> I'm not that fussed with hdmi
<5> you like it ? I mean it is your main multimedia display ? it's good to watch dvd on etc ?
<5> well ps3 is hdmi
<3> they aren't even going to do the whole picture downsampling until 2010, and by then you know that protection will have been cracked
<5> so if I seel my tv better get somethings good in exchange
<3> the more expensive ps3 is..
<8> get a 61
<8> hd
<8> 900$
<7> tell me when someone could help me
<3> Kepler, dvd's are a big so so, because the resolution is so damn high.
<3> Highly watchable and enjoyable still
<8> Dufresne
<8> er DuoMaxwel you have no gfx card
<8> haha
<5> snoops what big so so your talking about ?
<7> ima list my specs
<8> just your cpu ram and gfx card please
<7> ok
<7> the gfx card is lacking
<3> the quality on dvd's. Since the res is high, it makes dvd's look dodgy-ish. If you're right up 10 inches away from screen, since it is a pc monitor
<8> 1 gig ram min?
<3> but a few feet away then it's perfectly fine
<7> CPU: Viiv Pentium D 3.0Ghz each core (2 total) and it is 2 X 2MB L2 Cache || RAM: 2GB DDR2 Ram || GeForce 7300LE
<8> wow your monitor looks dodgy you shoulda got a crt
<5> snoops that's what I am talking about
<8> never heard of a 7300le
<7> but is the rest good?
<7> like...is the graphics card the only thing that is lacking?
<3> Shockwav, heh..any monitor running at 1920x1200 makes dvds look dodgy :)
<3> there's a 1080i rip of sin city..and holy crap. That's absolutely stunning on it
<5> dodgy you mean with little artifacts ?
<7> So, shockwav?
<5> snooops give me your monitors models
<5> and your contrast ratio
<3> umm a 2405fpw.. 1000:1
<5> hmm 1000:1 isn't high
<7> shockwav, still awake?
<7> i have 700:1 but dont care much for HDR lighting
<5> guest it's good for a comp lcd
<7> mine: Samsung SyncMaster 931b
<3> by far the best monitor I've ever used.. :)
<3> after a video card upgrade that is
<7> so, could someone please help me out?
<3> old card couldn't drive it properly. funny really
<9> lol
<9> 7300 LE
<9> i dunno which is worse
<9> that or the FX5200
<5> snoops which card you got
<7> is that the only bottleneck on it?
<9> but im guessing the FX5200 is worse.
<9> 7300LE... is absolute crap
<3> Kepler as for dvd video.. well ntsc dvd res is 720x480.. this monitor is 1920x1200.. consider how much you're having to upscale the video..
<9> just saying "LE" is absolute crap.
<3> I've got a 7900gt now Kepler
<5> I have a 6800gt 256mb gddr3 .. considering selling it and get a 7900gtx for the difference
<7> so, is that the only reason that my computer is ****ing?
<9> maybe
<9> the Pent D is ok, but lacking too
<7> how come?
<9> 7300LE costs what? 50 dollars?
<10> i want to knwo how hot is to hot for my cpu, processor, motherboard, ect.
<7> i thought the dual core ones were the best to buy
Return to
#hardware
or
Go to some related
logs:
#beginner
#bsd
gentoo stage tarball url
VT82-C59
#heroin
#firebird
#red
#vmware
#gentoo
#firebird
|
|