| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Comments:
<0> once you removed the driver, stop X, unload fglrx, emerge fglrx again (pointless but to make sure), eselect opengl set ati, modprobe -v fglrx, startx
<1> what package contains libGL?
<2> it fails with no screens found when i set driver to fglrx from radeon
<1> /query dana
<1> uhm
<1> wtf
<1> nvm
<0> modprobe -v fglrx?
<0> dmesg|tail
<3> oh well, that speadstream modem/routeur 6300 is working just fine
<2> module laoded
<2> laoded
<2> 8.27.10
<2> so it is the new one
<2> i get this while running glxgears
<0> put xorg.log on pastebin
<2> Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0"
<2> ok
<0> you restarted X?
<2> many times
<0> in Section Module
<0> do yuo have Load "dri"
<0> of xorg.conf
<2> yes
<0> glx too?
<2> yes, i'm at bastebin now
<2> taking a long time to submit
<2> is there another site i can use other than pastebin ?
<0> http://pasteme.com
<4> User: triki Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=317
<0> dunno, always forget whats the gentoo pastebin
<2> pasteme.com/p.php?id=317
<0> i need the xorg.log
<0> but add 32bit, some ati cards dont like 16 or 24 bit
<2> ok
<2> Depth 32
<2> god i hate ati
<4> User: triki Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=318
<2> http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=318
<0> thats radeon driver
<0> not fglrx
<2> when i load it, it fails
<2> no screens
<0> yes, i need the xorg.log of the failure
<2> ok doing it nwo
<2> now
<2> i found the script to remove old fglrx, did that, now emergeing ati-drivers again
<0> unload the module before emerging again
<2> already done
<2> script did it
<2> lsmod shows nothing
<2> No Devices Detected
<2> nos screens found
<0> did you reload the module?
<2> yes
<0> dmesg|tail shows?
<2> Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 616 Mbytes
<0> -> post xorg.log of failure
<2> module loaded - fglrx 8.27.10 [July 27 2006] on mirror 0
<2> hmm could it be because ATI Proprietary Linux Driver is being loaded ?
<2> i see that in Xorg.0.log
<5> hi, is it possible to get a normal root login on the 2006.0 livecd instead of the gnome environment ?
<0> switch to console?
<0> kill X :)
<0> dunno, never touch the gui crap livecd
<0> i found it a waste of ressources
<2> ***igning device section with no busID to primary device
<0> triki, post the entire log
<0> gotta go soon :)
<4> User: triki Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=319
<0> triki, hmm that doesnt look good, wouldnt know
<0> strange somehow
<2> ok i'll get back to googleing :P
<2> thanks for your time !
<0> np
<2> should i remove ati from kernel ?
<0> hmm what do you mean?
<2> i have ati support built into kernel
<0> could give it a try
<2> ok thanks !
<5> yeah switch to console ... how do I do that ?
<5> I have the livecd loaded now
<3> crtl+alt+f1
<5> any other way to achieve that ?
<5> I am doing a test setup in vmware ... pressing ctrl-alt takes me out of the vm
<3> :/
<3> then download the minimal installer cd
<3> or open the gnome terminal
<5> ah
<5> yeah but there I can't do su root
<5> cause it asks for the p***
<3> oh yeah.. forgot about that, I think theres a way other than switch to console and p***wd
<3> well, I dont have any web browser yet, still emerging firefox, so I can't search right now, because I would to know it as well, the tips to su whitout switching to console
<3> would like
<5> :)
<5> if I get the minimal installer ... can I rebuild later from scratch still ?
<3> why not
<6> sudo su ?
<5> k :)
<3> or you can get the universal cd
<6> vmware *must* have a way of sending keystrokes combined with ctrl-alt.
<6> It'd be ridiculous if not.
<3> if you get the minimal youll need to downlaod a stage, so get the universal wich already have stages,
<7> Sure, ctrl-alt by itself unlocks but ctrl-alt-something is transferred
<5> I have it but I want to install manually and not with the installer in gnome
<5> :/
<6> Did you try `sudo su' already?
<3> just open a gnome terminal, try sudo su
<6> (`sudo -i' -- same result)
<3> open firefox and enjoy reading the handbook from a real browser
<5> sudo su worked but I'm still in the gnome environment
<6> FatMom: I have to disagree there. I believe links, links2, lynx and w3m are as real as it gets.
<5> I would preffer the real console like the old 2005.1
<6> ReCuRSi0N: `killall X'? X might respawn automagically.
<6> ReCuRSi0N: Why did you download the iso image with the graphical installer in the first place?
<5> that puts me back in the login for gnome
<5> hehe
<6> ReCuRSi0N: /etc/init.d/xdm stop
<6> Happy now?
<5> yes perfect
<5> thank you :)
<6> np
<3> redondos: well, just personal taste.. I hate using a console web browser, I know you can use links witht he framebuffer but still....
<3> oh can you use firefox with framebuffer ?
<3> hmm guess not
<6> Firefox needs X, AFAIK it can't work on top of SDL.
<8> I have now official fixed my screen problems, it was HW problem.
<9> this girl on spike tv rt now is ****ing hot
<9> hehe
<10> hi
<10> how can i update glibc ?
<10> i have a newly installed system
<3> emerge glibc ?
<10> thnx
<10> i have a high loaded webserver. kernel 2.6 produces a lot of cpu wait, 2.4 doesnt. what do i do wrong?
<10> it only servs static datas
<10> emerge installs glibc 2.4 but i need 3.6 what can i do?
<3> 3.6 ?!
<10> 2.3.6
<11> i was going to ask you waht life is like in the future :\
<11> why do you _need_ 2.3.6?
<10> cause i need kernel 2.4
<11> er?
<11> heh
<10> and glibc 2.4 supports 2.6
<3> well you can always use package.mask
<10> now i have2.4 installed, will it downgrade that?
<11> if youre using 2.4... your profile should be: /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4
<11> ln -sf /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/no-nptl/2.4 /etc/make.profile
<11> then you'll get glibc 2.3.x
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
really-chicks
#computers
#politics
#solaris
heroin torrent
Ryan Letts, Heimlich
#photoshop
#flash
#gentoo
farcry port settings
|
|