| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Comments:
<0> i could see the reasons for a new stage 2 or stage 3 tarball but not livecd
<1> I dont stage2 or 3
<2> Hm. I jun a stage 1 :P
<2> run*
<1> anything but stage1 gives me explosive diaria
<0> thats nice ... i just do stage 3 then emerge -e world after editing make.conf
<1> does the new stages support smp?
<0> smp is baised out of the kernel has nothing to do with stages
<2> Hm... How do I 'activate' the gui in bmpx?
<1> I mean the i686 livdcd
<0> yes it dose all the livecd's have smp support
<0> last i knew atleast
<1> so I can just snag that 713270 KB livecd and install off cd and emerge --sync and then do a emerge -v -u system and bring mah machine up to current?
<3> aferthas, it's masked for me so i can't check, but you probably emerge it with +gtk
<4> MrEcho,
<2> duhbLow7: The bmpx ebuild doesn't have a gtk flag...
<4> for cflags i have -march=i686
<4> should I change that to -march=pentium4
<4> ?
<4> or leave it
<2> kikr: I suppose you could edit it to pentium4, for more optimisation..
<5> or pentium5 if you are feeling adventurous ;P
<0> b|aise: yo get current i would just sync and update /etc/make.profile then emerge -vuD world
<1> -D for --deep ?
<0> yea
<1> I have gentoo installed currently but I have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" on it and want to create another gentoo install that isn't developmental..
<1> for some reason I can't get hardware exeleration or glx working for xorg with it that way
<2> b|aise: So, basically, remove (comment) that line in /etc/make.conf and reemerge everything...
<0> yep emerge -e world
<0> after commenting it out
<5> emerge -e world is safe from remote shell?
<0> yea
<6> nothing is safe
<1> dont get me wrong, I still want to have that gentoo install.... I like the sneek peak of the new stuff, but I want regular stuff also
<6> every keypress is a keypress closer to death
<1> :)
<1> one step closer to your fate, no?
<6> i dont believe in fate
<0> b|aise: comment out ~x86 and unmask just what you want
<1> logic_box: is it wrong to want my cake and eat it too?
<0> depends if you are diabetic
<1> hehe
<1> I was just going to dualboot between stabe and developmental gentoo
<0> ok ... i don't really see a reason for it but ... ok
<2> Hm... If i use -march=k8, will it compile it with long, that is as a 64-bit binary?
<1> maybe even VM the development gentoo ontop of the stable
<0> i have been running ~x86 on this lappy since i built it no issues at all ... if i hit a prog that has major issues i mask it and use a lower version
<2> Is k8 = 64bit?
<1> ok, I uncommented out that line and did a emerge -p -e world too see what would happen and it doesn't look like its going to work
<1> so I guess I'll just start a new..
<7> Why am I getting this error?
<7> livecd / # grub-install /dev/hda
<7> Could not find device for /boot: Not found or not a block device.
<1> !whereis pasteme
<0> genpaste: !help
<8> To paste visit http://genpaste.pengu.in
<0> aferthas: k8 is x86-64 but i'm not sure what all you need for a full 64bit box i haven't built one yet
<8> b|aise pasted "See!", view at http://genpaste.pengu.in/pastes/show/285
<2> logic_box: The reason I'm asking is that my CPU is a k8 without long support, that is 64bit
<1> :)
<0> b|aise: you need to unmask a few things ... http://gentoo-wiki.com/Masked
<7> anyone?
<1> :\
<1> hehehe
<5> I have some complications with shadow and pam-login blocking each other
<5> I try to upgrade/emerge them 1 by 1, but it will not let me and tells me that it's conflicting
<0> w0rd55: merge -C sys-apps/pam-login
<0> Codegen: paste your grub.conf and the output of mount
<0> genpaste: !help
<8> To paste visit http://genpaste.pengu.in
<1> what happened to the minimal cd ?
<1> is it dead?
<7> logic_box: chroot env or not?
<0> no it's still there
<7> b|aise, it's still there
<7> for the mount output
<0> Codegen: mount will be the same inside chroot or out ... grub.conf is of course inside the chroot
<7> well, yeah
<7> wtf, I mounted the boot partition
<7> Outside of the chroot environment, the boot is mounted
<7> inside, it isn't
<0> just git it to me from outside
<8> Codegen pasted "What'd I **** up?", view at http://genpaste.pengu.in/pastes/show/286
<9> everything!
<0> Codegen: try root hd(0,1)
<7> after my smart***ing everyone the other day about that :/
<1> I'm going to make all new partitions
<7> Still the same error, though
<1> my root shall be hd0,0, swap will be 0,1 and root will be 0,2
<7> b|aise: Two roots?
<0> hda1 = hd0,0 hda2 = hd0,1
<1> boot will be 0,0
<0> seemes it's dual boot though or swap is hda1
<7> logic_box: I'm still getting the same error
<1> OMG!
<1> I dont even need a cd do I ?
<7> any oter ideas
<1> I could mount the boot root and swap and exctract my stage1 on there and chroot my arse in there to do my bootstrap
<8> logic_box annotated "What'd I **** up?", view at http://genpaste.pengu.in/pastes/show/286#287
<7> I mean about my oproblem
<1> oproblem?
<7> w/e]
<1> must be an irish problem,
<0> Codegen: check the annotate i did to your post try that
<10> ah i love deviant art
<7> Still thesame
<1> eh phuqit, I'ma just wipe the entire hda and start anew
<1> :)
<0> Codegen: dunno man i never played with grub i use lilo
<10> Codegen: do you have a symlink to boot in your boot directory
<7> yes
<10> and you have a vmlinuz-2.6.17.8 file
<7> yes
<10> and whats going wrong?
<7> reafd my genpaste thing
<7> err
<10> yeah that tells me nothing
<7> <7> Could not find device for /boot: Not found or not a block device.
<7> Sorry
<10> is this when installing grub?
<7> y6rse]
<7> yes(
<10> umount boot from outside the chroot, mount it inside
<10> so the chroot sees it, not the livecd
<0> i'm glad lilo never fails for me :)
<10> logic_box: grub doesn't fail when you use it right
<7> I'v ealways been told lilo was crap. Why, I don't know...
<10> just as lilo doesn't fail when you use it right
<10> Codegen: lilo just adds an extra step to the kernel upgrade process
<7> I've done this tens of times, don't knmow why It's not working this time :/
<10> really not an inconvenience unless youre so lazy that you can't type one more command
<10> Codegen: mount /boot inside the chroot like i said
<7> It worked
<7> Don't remember having to do that before, though :S
<7> Ok, now when I boot I get unrecognized device string with the root(hd0,0)
<7> 0,2*
<7> and a space between hd and the (0,2)
<7> ?
<11> ok ok
<11> bitrot makes me horny
<2> O.o
<11> ya
<11> i know
<10> Codegen: if you want hda2 its (0,1)
<10> aferthas: he's talking about the problem of bitrot, not the guy with the nickname bitrot
<10> ;P
<10> he's a necropheliac
<10> Codegen: root (hd0,1)
<2> Oh :D
<2> Ring ring ring ring rign.. bananaphone!
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
okanawai
#politics
cs .16 servers
utorrent-linux
#debian
qmail-remote crashed domain
#beginner
adam sandler/ottawa senators
#debian
#sex
|
|