| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> bariel: you can do it on the fly if you are still booted from the old drive, but you can't resize partitions that are currently in use
<1> we do ours online
<2> taxes = new engine
<1> we just go to the site and print them out
<1> pretty neat
<1> one of the few things that this company actually does right :)
<2> neat
<1> yeah
<2> i wish i could get mine handed to me
<1> i can do it from home and stuff
<2> when i leave
<3> iamben, if i want to resize partitions, i need to unmount it first?
<1> ah that would be ideal of course
<4> bitrot, how is this for awesome. 100.0% of our wireless customers are NAT'ed. those with "static" IP addresses are just 1:1 NAT's from an external to an internal.
<1> soul|work: sounds like you need a new engineer? :(
<1> or more IP space for that matter?
<2> heh
<1> soul|work: how are you guys manging the customers porst?
<1> ports*
<4> bitrot, i am #1, i have been repairing it since last february. it was even worse
<1> i guess people really don't care about hosting web servers and **** on their wifi?
<2> i wonder if pfsense can do load balancing while doing 1:1
<4> we aren't, we just forward the entire IP to their radio
<1> oh
<1> well wait
<1> why 1:1?
<1> you have one Public IP for ever NAT IP?
<2> i would stab a nigger if they gave me a private IP
<2> just fyi
<2> there are crazy ****s out there, like bitrot and myself
<1> sorry
<1> i'm hungry :(
<1> soul|work: answer meh pls
<0> bariel: yes they must be unmounted... shouldnt be a problem right after the dd though, the new ones wont be mounted anywhere
<1> ANSWER PLS
<1> iamben: answer my question that i asked soul|work please.
<4> bitrot,
<1> whew
<1> there you are
<3> iamben, thanks for that, the new hdd is busy now =)
<4> those customers that request privates, they get a 1:1 NAT. those that don't just have regular nat
<1> AHHH
<1> I C
<4> so a customer with a public gets a specific 207. matched to their internal 172
<4> etc etc
<4> it is a giant load of donkey ****
<1> you made it seem like every one and their sister got a 1:1
<4> but we don't have ANY routers plugged into our backbone provider right now - just 3 firewalls
<5> slut.
<1> which would be grounds for a beating IMO
<3> iamben, one more question, after the dd is finish, will grub start with new hdd without any problem?
<1> we use 10.0.0.0/8 for local routing w/ our modems
<1> are you guys doing kind of the same thing?
<1> i'm confused tbh
<0> bariel: yeah thats the beauty of it, even the mbr & bootloader is copied exactly
<1> too much NAT talk
<1> worries me
<3> iamben, nice one
<4> we were formerly on a 10.0.0.0/8. it would have worked fine except the engineer before me was a ****ing retard and used some auto-route generating GUI that literally put around 300 to 600 static routes on every single tower distro, and close to 1000 static routes on our core router
<0> bariel: make sure you swap the new drive into the same place the old drive was so the device is the same & everything
<4> since then i have transitioned it all to a 172
<1> soul|work: lol you were telling me bout that :D
<1> sounds like a logistical nightmare :)
<3> iamben, i will do it, since i am using notebook and i have only 1 hdd slot
<1> at least was
<4> i mean how lazy can you be. we only have around 220 customers
<6> right, my gf just kinda broke up with me
<1> wow
<1> lol
<1> he had 1000 static routes for 220 cusotmers?
<6> "I need time alone"
<4> bitrot, more than that actually
<4> and dozens of routing loops
<1> soul|work: didn't you say that you improved latency by 200ms by removing a lot of the garbage routes?
<4> in some cases yeah
<4> the average CPU load on our core router went from 70% to 1%
<4> it was spending almost all its time processing its routing table
<4> that's how bad it was
<1> yeah but it's still nuts that a bad routing table increased it by 200 lol
<1> well what's the point of a fancy *** router when it's not working!
<4> haha fancy
<1> get that load up to 30%
<4> it was a pentium 2 in a 4U rackmount ch***is
<4> with like... a few IDE HDD
<1> yeahhhh like I said...fancy :)
<4> it's great now though
<7> good, I was going to cry if it was a p4 or newer
<1> question
<4> soulmata@dipstick ~ $ ping 172.16.8.50
<4> PING 172.16.8.50 (172.16.8.50) 56(84) bytes of data.
<4> 64 bytes from 172.16.8.50: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=6.01 ms
<1> could I do a 1:1 NAT on a local IP that has already been nated?
<4> that's a link that goes over the air well over 100 miles round-trip
<4> yeah, as long as the original NAT rule applies to a subnet and not the specific IP
<1> like do a 1:1 map
<1> no wait
<1> nm
<1> that wont work :)
<4> :{
<0> my link has to go into space and back, it takes a long time
<1> iamben: :D
<4> haha it was so crazy. by the time a packet left our datacenter, it had been wrapped in 4 layers of NAT
<1> iamben: you get your gps software?
<4> sometimes 5
<7> soul|work: lol
<8> iamben: its like 250miles up or something
<1> soul|work: @.@
<1> good thing they hired jo *** eh?
<9> bitrot: hows the ice chewer
<7> MrEcho: IIRC, it is higher than that
<1> he's good
<0> bitrot: i never could get the citynav one to work, but i've fetched everything else from you already
<1> boachan: he pulled me aside friday to let me know i'm an ***hole ahahah
<0> city nav 8 has some mad copy protection in place
<1> iamben: doh :(
<4> yeah. turns out the guy now bales hay and hunts, and his installer now raises turkeys. yes, they were both former "wireless technicians"
<0> i MIGHT end up buying it
<7> MrEcho: 26,200 miles :-P
<1> that good eh?
<4> he actually missed a service call once because, quote, "my pigs got loose and i had to rally them"
<1> soul|work: turkeys?
<4> yeah. he went from installing CPEs to raising turkeys.
<4> i do not know how that happened
<1> talk about a career change @.@
<8> CannedBar: umm.. no
<7> MrEcho: it is a geosynchronus satellite, isn't it?
<8> ya
<8> im sorry .. but that dish thats used ... sure as **** wouldnt make it 26K miles
<0> MrEcho: wanna hear the latest dish bull****?
<8> iamben: sure
<0> im trying to DL something from rapidshare which has a 100MB per hour limit per IP
<0> i guess im on a shared IP
<1> GAH
<1> wait
<1> wtf?
<1> shared PUBLIC IP???
<8> ya
<8> its that ****ed up bitrot
<6> is that even legal?
<1> uhh forget legal
<1> how does that work LOL
<7> Smong: of course it is legal
<0> so sometimes when i go to DL something for the first time in days, it says "wait 1 hour" or even says "you are already downloading a file"
<1> Smong: you do undersatnd there is no regulation on the interweb? @.@
<1> CannedBar: how does that work tho?
<1> I have no idea how a dish network is setup :(
<1> how can more than one user be using a public routeable IP?
<1> iamben: does your ISP give you a public address or a private address?
<0> im basically behind a nat router
<1> OMG
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
was sadaam shiiate or sunni
dcm245 web interface
#computers
#stocks
ashley cole skills
dolphin fucking
#computers
#nhl
#beginner
#linux-noob
|
|