| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Comments:
<0> lol
<1> sorry for the multiple line responses, i'm getting used to a new kb.
<0> sall good :P which one did you get?
<1> me? keyboard? oh it's just some generic mfer we had laying around.
<0> ahh
<2> OK looks like i'm using 3.4.6
<1> i'm used to dvorak, so switching back to qwerty is weird.
<1> LuteM, is that the correct version?
<2> Yes that's the one I was going for followed the instructons from the gentoo handbook
<1> i think now it switches versions for you when you upgrade it.
<3> :P
<2> I had a build that was hanging cuz it wanted 3.4 so I did a little search and found the instructions then went for it
<4> LuteM: if you went from 3.3 to 3.4 you should rebuild your entire box
<2> Did that's when mplayer broke
<4> have you tried a revdep-rebuild?
<1> OH, i thought you were trying to COMPILE mplayer.
<1> not enough coffee this morning.
<5> mmmm coffee
<2> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
<2> did the -e build rebuilt the entire system
<4> LuteM: try "revdep-rebuild -pv" anyway and check the output
<2> OK will do
<2> It's searching
<2> I have not scrapped gcc 3.3.6 yet could that be causing any problems?
<2> It seems to have found a broken link so far
<4> LuteM: not scrapping gcc 3.3 should not be causing any issues, gcc is slotted so you can have multiple versions on the same machine
<2> OK just wanted to make sure. revdep is finding some broken links now
<6> good morning. i was wondering if there is a way to discover which motherboard (manufacturer/model) im using. dmesg doesnt tell me anything useful about it... does anyone know any other way to accomplish this?
<7> open the case :P
<7> thats the only way
<8> whot?
<6> yeah, i was trying to avoid that... since im too far away. heh
<6> thanks :)
<2> CannedBar, is there a way to rebuild mplayer with 3.3?
<8> rvt: what does lspci -v say about your chipset?
<9> rvt: lshw
<10> Rage against Gentoo!!
<10> >:|
<9> description: Motherboard vendor: Intel product: SE7520BD2S
<9> ding
<4> LuteM: you could switch your compiler back to gcc 3.3 and recompile, dunno if that will fix the issue though
<4> jatma: lspci -v
<9> CannedBar: huh?
<2> Well not really that big of a deal can use xine for most stuff but it doesn't like wmv files
<9> CannedBar: lshw will tell you what motherboard you have, not lspci
<4> jatma: oh nevermind, that is the motherboard model.
<8> zomgz corporal jatma
<9> nastjuid, captain
<4> I'm just not used to intel server model numbers :-)
<9> nastjuid: salute, boy
<11> jatma: seems I didn't turn cec on or I have up upgrade firmware, all in all I have to head to the datacenter, heh
<9> mikefoo: cec?
<8> psh
<11> the remote console
<9> ah right
<11> in aoetool suite.
<11> more then likely not even needed
<11> just set it up once and its good to go..
<12> User: Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=265
<12> User: Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=266
<11> hey, what you think about me doing jbod for 15 drives and mounting them all to 3/4 servers, would throughput be ok you think?
<11> 3-4 rather
<9> it'd be the same as 1 drive
<11> yah?
<11> how is that?
<9> if you want through put, raid0 them all, if you want safety, raid1 or 5
<11> its 1 drives throughput times 15, no?
<13> the jatma just knows
<9> if you want both, raid10 or 50
<11> nah, we need jbod, we need extra disks on several servers
<9> mikefoo: it'd be 15times if you used raid0, but jbod isnt raid0
<9> jbod has no advantages other than it is easy
<9> and if a drive dies, theres a *slight* probability that you can fix the filesystem
<9> whereas raid-0, its gone for good
<11> i just basically need 15 devices online
<9> i use 2x raid5 sets of 7 drives
<9> raid0 them
<9> and use the remaining for a hot spare
<11> so I can mount them to machines, the data isn't important, its cache, we just need the capacity
<9> you end up with 12 drives worth of storage
<4> wtf, raid0 over raid5, that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard (unless I am misunderstanding)
<9> and its about 3x-4x faster than one disk
<9> CannedBar: tahts raid50
<4> oh wait, I get it now, heh. brain lapse.
<9> raid05 would be dumb, yes
<9> hehehe
<13> CannedBar: do not try to understand the jatma, that is impossible. Instead, only try to see the truth, there is no matja
<11> heh
<13> that would have been a good /kick line
<11> yeah I think my only option is jbod though.
<9> whyyy
<9> jbod is eugghhhhh
<9> :/
<1> haha
<11> i need 15 drives online, and we only have one 15 drive coraid, heh
<1> i love reading football related forums
<1> those people get PISSED
<9> mikefoo: ohhhh, then you cant have redundancy...
<11> yeah, its not for redundancy
<9> mikefoo: if you have no redundancy then you may as well raid-0 them
<9> that'd maximize performance and be just as redundancy-less as a jbod
<9> :)
<9> 15 seperate filesystems not an option?
<1> i'm needing to sell my old pata raid setup.
<9> because at least that way if a drive dies, there less backups to restore
<9> *fewer
<11> don't need to restore data either, heh
<9> nastjuid: i bought a new gaming rig
<1> CannedBar, that's all its worth now adays. 8(
<8> jatma: oh? do tell
<1> i got 4 40gb, and 2 60gb pata disks
<9> nastjuid: 4x 15k scsi in raid=0 loads bf2 quick
<4> jatma: lol
<1> i saw 10 40s sell for $40 on ebay!
<9> i got a lsi logic scsi raid card for peanuts
<4> heh, used drives = cheap :-P
<9> so i just went ahead and got some 15k drives
<9> and the bf2 god was happy.
<8> jatma: that's nice, but do you lag like **** when you run fraps?
<4> shame on you for not using them for gentoo
<9> nastjuid: lag? whats that?
<8> FRAPS
<8> FOOL FRAP
<8> S
<9> never seen this 'lag' thing before
<8> do you get ****ty framerate drop when you record?
<9> are you sure you're not making these things up
<9> :p
<9> at 280MB/s write speed, no
<9> theres no lag
<1> i used to get a lot of lag, but then i upgraded to a 28.8Kbps modem
<9> :((((
<8> <3
<9> i accidently recorded an entire game with fraps
<9> never noticed until i ran out of disk space for my porn
<4> hahaha
<9> :/
<4> porn on raid0, do they really thrust that fast?
<1> nastjuid, i used to have an IBM XT on an external 300baud with aol 1.0.
<1> DOS style
<9> mplayer -speed 10
<9> <3
<9> actually 1.6 is about the sweet spot
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#politics
#computers
#solaris
sqlmetal
#qmail
basebek
#hardware
#c
#politics
#computers
|
|