| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Comments:
<0> redhook: rright, i forgot
<1> Mik-: gentoo or vanilla sources?
<1> gentoo-sources are known to cause troubling breezes when it comes to advanced iptabling
<2> hmm i never had problems with gentoo sources and advanced netfilter/iproute2 stuff
<3> how do u rebuild filesystem on a hdd ?
<3> *do i
<4> the boss is gone all week.
<2> mine has just come back
<4> if only i had my pillow
<2> :)
<5> bjorn: vanilla-sources
<5> renihs: with routing itself is not a problem, it routes fine
<5> just when I enable iptables, it stops communication to gentoo boxes
<6> Mik- your iptables rules are bad?
<5> warflyr : Nope, working fine in other places
<5> otherwise why would communication go fine to the same subnet (Linux CentOS + solaris)
<5> it's somehow gentoo related, it seems
<7> you built your own kernel right?
<6> unless you have specific rules which affect ips within that subnet, it shouldnt matter
<5> exactly
<6> the OS doesnt matter
<5> yep, I did build my own kernel, vanilla sources, same rules for all boxes in subnet (network based, not host based)
<5> using iproute2
<5> do I need advanced routing support for that?
<5> it's enabled, maybe I should take it out
<6> for iproute2 yes
<5> oh..ok
<6> though you prolly dont need iproute2 nore advanced routing
<6> unless youre actually routing
<5> I do need iproute2, it's about routing between virtual interfaces on 1 physical interface
<5> for that I need ip utility
<5> as well as for keepalived for clustering
<5> it's working perfectly, until I enable iptables
<6> your iptables rules are wrong
<6> im gonna go to work
<5> ok here are those rules
<6> ill catch irc up in 20mins
<5> any place beside pastebin.com (malfunctioning now) I can do paste?
<0> topic
<8> http://pasteme.com/
<9> User: Mike Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=250
<5> there we go
<5> http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=250
<5> if I don't use states, all goes fine
<5> so it is state related problem
<5> sounds to me like a bug
<8> do you have ip forwarding enabled/
<5> or like something in gentoo kernel does randomizing of TCP sequences
<5> of course
<8> let me read up on what exactly your problem is
<10> syncookies? rpf?
<5> syncookies on
<10> turn em off
<5> what's rpf?
<10> return path filtering
<10> you need to turn that off if you're doing e.g. policy routing on multiple interfaces
<8> are your eth0 and eth1 bridged subnets or what?
<5> Hm..syncookies are actually off
<5> lude: example - 85.112.149.128/25 and 85.112.149.0/25 are on the same physical eth1
<5> eth0 is not a problem
<5> problem with reachability between those 2 subnets - some servers are responding fine (CentOS, Windows, Solaris), and Gentoo are not
<5> so naturally I am suspecting something is wrong with kernel in Gentoo
<8> you said you were using vanilla sources before
<5> yep
<5> using vanilla
<8> so it's nothing at all to do with gentoo
<8> you have two different subnets on the same eth1? sounds like a netmask/brd issue
<5> I agree with you on that, but something is fishy here - why I cannot reach only gentoo boxes? All those machines stand in the same switch, no vlans or such
<5> checked - netmasks and brd are correct
<8> can we see the output of ip addr?
<8> no that i don't trust you, just want to see what we're dealing with
<9> User: Mike Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=251
<5> yep
<9> User: Mike Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=252
<5> and routing there
<10> hmm you need rpf off if you don't have multiple phys?
<5> what's sysctl parameter for rpf?
<8> net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter
<10> proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/*/rp_filter
<5> ok, it is active
<10> turn it off
<10> it might help, although i never tried your conf... i have multiple phys
<5> ok, I will. But I can't test it now, since it's in production as router
<5> will do in 6 hours from now
<5> planned downtime, you know :=
<5> :)
<5> Anyway, thanks for advises, I gotta run now. Will keep you posted.
<11> aww screw the rest of the shop, just do it :)
<12> hi
<12> sup Luminous :P
<12> err lude
<12> <3 thoes 1950's and 2950's :)
<8> Kash: yeah i just started playing with them
<8> they're some fast bastids
<12> yeah i want a 1950 and a 2950 for my rack :)
<8> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz
<8> that is a FAST chip
<12> yes
<12> it is
<12> it makes me hard some what
<2> model name : Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz
<2> :)
<2> i dont like xeons
<13> which model xeon?
<2> model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 848
<2> those are better :)
<2> spb, dunno, that 2.8 is stone old
<14> 13:19 < redhook> ShALLaX: I never see that
<14> then youre not looking
<14> lo
<14> ;p
<15> lude =)
<13> renihs: nothing new and fast then
<13> how boring
<2> indeed
<2> but i have a sunfire 4900 standing next to me
<2> also old, but at least expensive :)
<2> anyone needs it? we could make a nice price :)
<2> hmm i once used a tool to convert jpeg images to vector based stuff, cant remember its name, anyone?
<16> imagemagic?
<16> err s/c/k
<14> magick
<14> ;)
<17> the weather widget on desktops, where do they get their information from?
<17> weatheronline.com?
<18> thermometers and windmills
<17> sure, connected true bluetooth I ***ume
<17> trough
<4> through?
<19> perhaps even thorough :>
<20> Hello All.
<20> Gentoo starts to load
<20> I get text
<20> than it stops, says something about non-DDC laptop panel detected
<20> and it goes blank
<20> I hook it up to a LCD panel monitor I have on the wall
<20> and I can see now.
<14> EightPock: what a nice story
<14> i liked the ending
<2> matja: you around?
<20> lol
<20> ShALLaX
<20> :P
<14> but yeah, not sure what the problem is
<14> googled non-ddc panel?
<20> ya.. well I got a monitor hooked to it.. and I got bigger issues lol
<20> VFS: Cannot open root device hdc3 or unknown-block(0,0)
<20> Please append a correct "root"= boot option
<14> do you definitely have a hard drive on your secondary IDE channel
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#nhl
#politics
S10CSIFFLAGS ubuntu
nVidia 6100 is shit
#sql
#beginner
#solaris
#stocks
kol's vistaxp
#debian
|
|