| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Comments:
<0> wtf how
<1> grew up with some kids of a local ISP owner
<2> http://speakeasy.net/business/t1/bonded.php
<1> who happens to be independantly wealthy
<1> and just runs his ISP for fun
<2> http://speakeasy.net/promos/BT1850/ aww there we go
<1> then i set up half his wifi network
<1> so he put an antenna up at my house and capped me 5m up/down and charged me regular price
<0> nice
<1> ya know, i'd be happy if i could get a balancing 3m
<0> MrEcho: yeah we might need that for our hotel
<1> or however you wanna call it
<1> if i'm only using 1m down, i can use 2 up
<0> 2 data, 1 voice t1's
<1> if i use 2 down i can use 1 up
<1> Kash: that's what we're using here.. only at 3 offices
<2> kash, its a pretty good deal
<0> the only problem is
<0> we currently pay $70
<2> heh
<0> our customers are bandwidth mongers
<0> lol
<0> we get 6/786 dsl
<0> i might have to get another and somehow load balance em
<0> that 850 is expensive
<0> u can get 1 t1's for 389
<2> or get on a sonet....
<1> damni
<2> but getting a nice router that can bond connections would work
<1> i don't wanna drive to whittier
<2> gezz http://anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2832&p=6
<1> what the ****
<1> 8 cores
<2> test chips
<3> [10:03] <1> ya know, i'd be happy if i could get a balancing 3m
<3> pretty sure they call that "half duplex"
<3> or you could do it the proper way
<3> via CBQ
<1> cl*** based queueing?
<0> half duplex?
<0> and yeah why cbq thats shaping.throttling
<3> the way i do it for our customers,
<3> i have a CBQ rule with a global pool, a per-interface pool and a per-customer pool
<1> it would have to be aggregate in a way in relation to up/down
<3> if they have a symmetrical account, their up/down is part of a larger pool
<3> a 2m account can get 2m aggregate, at any one time
<1> oic
<1> i just wish i had more options than charter or verizon dsl
<1> verizon dsl offers 4 down 786 up
<1> but i haven't had very good experiences with dsl
<3> verizon ripped me the **** off
<3> and so did earthlink
<1> it tends to go down at random
<3> every DSL isp i've dealt with (total of 4) have been completely worthless
<1> if verizon had an uptime SLA, i'd switch
<1> but charter has been pretty solid
<3> i've had a comcast cable connection for the past 2 1/2 years
<3> has not gone down a single time
<3> even when a local substation goes down
<3> and i get 14 ****ing meg down
<3> (i pay for 7)
<3> 384 up though. i wantedmore upload so i also hooked myself up straight to my work via a wireless shot
<1> wow, gg, they changed it
<1> down 768 up
<4> Throw a jew down a well
<1> the increase in upstream is almost worth it
<4> 768 up
<4> how generous
<1> better than my current 256
<4> yeah 256 blows
<3> i remember when 256 up was 100% internet baller
<4> heh
<4> I remember when LanCity was out here
<4> before people believe in QoS
<4> or DOCSIS for that matter lol
<3> what was lancity
<4> type of modems they used to use out here
<4> you could get a full 5/5
<4> or was it 10/10
<4> I can't remember
<4> anyways the modems were the size of a desktop :D
<4> I didn't live in the right area so i didn't haveone :(
<4> but I knew people who did
<1> verizon site is retarded
<1> it keeps showing that it found multiple addresses. one for north one for south
<1> i pick on and hit next, it shows the same ****
<4> that could happen
<1> then it says we found multiple again, then doesn't show anything
<1> fcking retards
<4> lol
<1> Up to 15 Mbps/2 Mbps $44.95
<1> that's what I'm talkin about
<4> lol
<4> we're such crooks over here it's not even funny
<4> $60 for 10/1 :(
<4> $150 for 10/2
<4> 10/2 would be a 'business' line so you wouldn't get your ports filtered
<5> you can get 10/2 :<
<1> $199 for 30/5
<5> i would KEEL for 10/2 :<
<1> hahaha
<4> the $60 would be residential so ports are blocked
<4> nastjuid: WOW
<1> yeah dude
<4> 30/5!?
<1> i'd so pay that
<4> jesus christ
<4> **** yeah
<4> that's cheaper than a ****ing t1
<1> that's verizon's FIOS
<4> yeah
<4> now I want to move
<4> THANKS A LOT
<1> but i can't check availability
<1> though I'm sure i can't get it
<4> hehehe
<1> i wish they had a map so i could see which areas have it
<4> this nigger is talking to himself again
<1> 40/mo for 5/2
<2> ****ing crapular
<2> tossed my phone against the wall
<4> lol
<4> this guy said he didn't like my tone
<4> because the stupid son of a bitch didn't understand that he didn't speak to the right people to get it done in the first place
<4> I must have told him I'll take care of it about 4 ****ing times
<4> yeah today is the final straw
<4> sick of this endless arguing with dip****s because other people didn't do something.
<6> any suggestions from keeping these spammers from hitting this guys web form?
<6> they're actually getting the form, then posting to it
<6> even though the email address is clearly in the form.
<1> hey MrEcho
<1> you should look at this
<1> http://www.cellularaddict.com/fios/LosAngelesfiOS2jpg.jpg
<4> katepls: CAPTCHA
<7> katepls: javascript
<6> thrasher7, what if they don't have a js enabled client?
<6> just don't allow them to use the form?
<6> that wont fly.
<6> captcha would require more work than it
<6> 's worth to me.
<7> captha + js
<7> here is what you do
<6> this is a static html form.
<7> this will fool 99% of spammers
<6> k
<7> put this below the form
<7> 7+5 = <textbox>
<2> nastjuid: that isnt up-to-date
<7> with JS auto-fll the box and hide it
<7> that way nobody sees it if they have js
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#worldcup
#politics
#freebsd
#beginner
#beginner
#beginner
#beginner
#beginner
#politics
NVidia drivers 64 bit +enable window spanning across multiple displays
|
|
