| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> lude, how many boxes?
<1> http://www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official << Test url ;p
<2> < 1 yr
<2> MrEcho_: like 60
<1> lude: nice work.
<1> bah
<1> stops at the ?
<1> son of a biotch.
<2> but 60 very important boxes
<3> bitrot: That is a bogus dependency. The sources don't reference any files from that package. It's going to be removed in the next portage release.
<1> redondos: the debian utils?
<3> bitrot: Yes.
<1> redondos: oh okay thanks.
<3> sure :)
<1> redondos: you know what happend with confcache? Is that now built into the latest ~arch portage?
<4> oh, gnome 2.14.2
<1> confcache was freaking out on me when I tried to update world.
<3> bitrot: It builds fine, but it's hardmasked because it sometimes brakes config files.
<1> hmm
<1> well i had it emerged
<3> bitrot: As flameeyes said: confcache really needs more work before prime-time
<0> that it does
<1> and I had confcache defined in my FEATURES var and debianutils was failing to compile, I removed the confcache feature (kept the ccache) and it started to compile.
<0> way to many issues with it
<1> huh
<1> I never really ran into issues with it.
<1> I guess I was not using it enough or something heh.
<3> bitrot Just don't use confcache for now. It's really borked. You were lucky if you didn't have any problems.
<1> but I LIKE IT!
<1> lol
<1> thanks for the 411 :)
<3> :)
<3> Thanks for the voice.
<1> np you can now be heard.
<1> feel free to voice your opinion
<0> heh
<2> I'm still ironing out m*** package management
<1> as long as an op agrees with it, lude is touchy.
<1> lude: yeah how are you going to handle that :)
<1> I'm curious
<2> redondos? i've never seen him be an ***
<2> i'm thinking creative /usr/portage nfs mounting
<1> ooo
<2> /usr/portage and /usr/portage64
<1> oh you have 64 boxen?
<2> with the packages dir holding my binaries
<1> er 64bit boxen even.
<2> i have a mixed farm
<2> production stuff is all 64 bit
<5> http://pastebin.ca/85796 help please!
<1> you have applications that currently require 64bit?
<4> so when are the new core duo 2 coming out ?
<0> adio_: your still ****ing with that... gezz
<2> adio_: you're pointing to the wrong LD_LIBRARY_PATH when you start compiz
<2> it needs the mesa 6.5.x libs
<2> bitrot: we run all java stuff
<2> and mysql
<1> lude: ahhh that's right.
<2> both which perform much better on 64 bit machines
<1> yeah I could imagine heh.
<1> 60 gentoo boxen though woo
<2> representing executing broker for like 3% of US market volume
<1> I don't think work would ever drop RHEL ; they love vendor support heh.
<1> although I don't think they have every actually used it.
<1> they just like that security blanked to fall back on I suppose.
<2> we have some hacked up rhel in place no
<2> w
<2> i hate it
<1> yeah
<1> we currently have tons of issues with motorola
<1> i honestly am glad to say I can't wait until we just go all CISCO heh.
<2> yeah i'm all cisco
<1> Don't get me wrong Motorola is on the ball
<1> oo did you guys read about that new type of storage that Freescale developed?
<1> as much storage as a HD w/ the speed of flash/ram.
<4> 50T ?
<1> no
<1> new type of storage.
<1> I can't recall the name of it, was in the newspaper a couple of days ago.
<1> My dad showed me it heh, god knows I haven't touched a real newspaper in years hah.
<6> dont expect to get your hands on it anytime soon
<1> oh i'm not
<1> and that's what I told my pops
<1> i was like dude...to phase something like this in..we wont see it for another ~5 years.
<6> they've been coming up with stuff like that every year for the last 5 and none of it is availiable yet
<6> a lot of it is hard to m*** produce
<1> they stated that they are manufacturing the devices, but no type of consumer release date.
<6> those things will be marketed to supercomputer centers
<1> well they stated they _are_ producing it, I'm not sure on the production scale though.
<1> redondos: yeah, but they eventually will have a type of 'home' type of device as well.
<1> remember....PCs were super computers at one point lol
<6> maybe 10 years from now
<1> meh dunno
<6> my linksys routers would have been called supercomputers at one point
<1> heheh
<0> thats kind of creepy in a way
<1> what do you mean?
<1> well a super computer was never the size of a PC
<4> bitrot: you still using mac osX ?
<0> just have far we have come so fast
<1> FatMom: yeah
<1> MrEcho_: meh
<4> you have a mac ?
<1> FatMom: That's the main requirement for running OS X I believe ;)
<4> well...
<0> not relly bitrot
<4> you could use some intel pc motherboard....
<1> yeah...you install the intel os x and tell me how 'awesome' it is :)
<1> righttttt
<1> have any of you tried that? O.o
<4> but anyway
<1> It's not worth 'using'.
<0> dont have a sse2 chip
<4> my real question is
<1> Lets put it that way.
<1> even WITH see2
<6> I read a while back that OS X had better performance on a dell
<1> err 3
<1> sse2/3
<1> you still have to have specific video card and of course sound and of course NIC.
<1> It's a huge hack.
<4> have you tried windows on it ? and games.. do they run fine ? or even better than win on a pc
<1> I haven't touched it in a while.
<1> FatMom: I own a PPC, not Intel.
<4> oh
<1> it's a G4 1.50Ghz
<1> and yeah i did try to play games on it
<4> ok so
<1> like WoW
<1> ahah
<1> it's horrible
<6> whats that program that lets you run multiple OS's at the same time on x86 OSX?
<1> i rather play on my amd64x2 3800+ w/ my Geforce 7800GT
<4> do you know if win and especially games runs fin on mac x86
<1> redondos: uhmm like a emulator type thing?
<6> FatMom: it runs fine
<4> i mean fine
<2> JOSIE'S ON A VACATION FAR AWAY
<6> bitrot: its a virtualization thing
<2> COME AROUND AND TALK IT OVER
<6> bitrot: networks them all seamless
<1> FatMom: I wouldn't see why they wouldn't, I'm not sure on how well the video cards are in those macs, they still use ATI yea?
<4> I dont know
<6> the video is fast
<6> Radeon X800 iirc
<1> oh yeah then I wouldn'
<1> er
<0> http://tinyurl.com/r6djo thats kind of nuts
<6> or X1800
<1> i wouldn't see any issues with games at that.
<4> wow, x1800
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
#winxp
#linuxhelp
#nhl
wet-backs means
#delphi
gentoo z61
#stocks
#politics
azureus force decentralized tracking
#solaris
|
|