| |
| |
| |
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Comments:
<0> hmm, where in the kernelconfig does one set the resolution of the command line shell?
<0> 640x480 isnt really satisfying :p
<1> im getting this error when im compiling most things on my pc : i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc: march=i686: No such file or directory
<1> any ideas wha this could be?
<2> oteren, if you already have freamebuffer support enabled in the kernel, just specify it in your boot loader or use the framebuffer utils
<2> if you mean while in text-mode, use setfont
<2> setfont alt-8x8 = win
<0> boot loader, roger
<3> ugh
<3> what a ****in night
<1> can anyone suggest a decent netcafe program that plays nicely with gentoo?
<4> hehe nathanGL
<3> yeah
<3> my gf went out to this thing with her new company and she puked in cab, i had to direct cab to my place, then she puked in my bed
<5> Yvon Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=136
<6> Don't suppose anyone is alive to help me with an emerge problem?
<0> hmm
<0> grub is claiming i havent mounted my boot partition rw
<0> which i have
<0> poop.
<7> yvon
<7> I believe that error has been covered before on bugs.gentoo.org
<7> I think it has to do with the libpng version being incorrect or something
<7> don't remember what the root cause was exactly
<6> Gotcha, thanks Penguin
<7> moo
<8> so, I have -qt in my use flag, and while emerging gnome, it want to install qt 3 and 4 ?!
<7> yes
<7> doesn't GNOME require qt ?
<8> I thought qt was only kde related...
<2> FatMom: also specify -kde
<8> sure I have -kde as well
<7> you can usually see with emerge -uDpt world
<2> there a several dependancies of gnome which can be used on kde too
<8> but I will double check
<7> the 't' will show the dependancy tree
<8> oh well
<8> lets emege it anyway
<8> next time ill do gnome-light
<8> or kde...
<9> icewm forevar!!1
<3> lol
<3> how can I make an image of my gentoo installatino to be used by a vm
<2> make a vm, make a virtual disk, mount your physical disk as an additional hd, boot a livecd, and rsync or dd it across
<3> that is good idea.
<3> matja is da man
<2> you can even dd the raw filesystem to a file
<2> then add it as a .pln disk
<10> does anyone know if cygwin modifys the registry at all?
<10> I want to know if I can run it off a network drive? :X
<5> CyberGlitch Pasted http://pasteme.com/p.php?id=137
<3> is that guy in the portage group
<3> man, the new challenger is bad ***
<4> is there any way to get sbc static ip installation charges waived?
<10> lol
<10> ask the person you're talking to pretty please.
<10> Kash: how much are they looking for?
<4> 250.00
<10> WHAT
<10> whoa wait a min
<10> now are they insatlling new service for that static ip?
<10> or is that to just 'enable' the static ip on your current connection?
<4> nah
<4> i dont have dsl presently
<4> i'm
<4> "switching"
<10> sounds like a install charge to me then.
<10> And damn that's steep heh
<4> yeah
<10> Does SBC offer a static ip on their residential service?
<4> well we get it done at the hotel's bu thats not a problem
<4> yeah
<11> zfs owns you!
<11> that is all
<4> i think you can get reverse and all too
<10> Kash: ahh yeah sounds like how we do it here.
<10> Kash: do you know if they put you into a contract?
<4> 5 static ip's 6mbs down 608kbps up
<10> how much a month?
<4> well its 94 a month with regular non contract
<4> 79 if u want a 1 year
<10> That's pretty good
<10> even better
<4> i think you can request more ip's too
<10> we charge $179mo for 1 static ip on a 10/2 cable line.
<4> dang
<10> depending on the contract you sign you will get the shaft for either $145.00 - $250.00 install
<3> man I wuold not mind an impreza wrx
<4> yeah rr charges $99 for 2/384 1 static
<10> depening on if they have to build the line out or not.
<10> lol
<10> thats about what we charge
<10> Kash: do you really need the 5 statics?
<4> yeah..
<4> i'm tired of 1 to 1 nat breaking my sip
<4> and incoming connections.. my exchange box is hosted at home
<10> how does NAT break your SIP?
<4> sip doesnt work though nat
<10> whaaa
<4> well if my phone is outside behind another nat (like most hotels)
<4> and my sip box is behind my nat box.. it doesnt work
<10> i'm not familiar with SIP to be honest
<3> VOIP that ****, bitrot!
<10> ahhh okay
<10> so i'm ***uming your router doesn't forward IP ports then eh?
<10> I'm not sure what port SIP runs on :X
<2> im finding myself deploying openvpn more and more thesedays just to get arround nat breakage
<3> dunno
<3> yeah
<4> sip uses rcp
<4> which is random ports :(
<4> bitrot: msg :P
<3> ****s
<10> ahh
<10> damn that does **** lol
<3> just check the rfc
<10> too lazy
<3> holon
<4> hehe :P
<2> Kash: rcp?
<2> i thought it just used 5060
<2> if you encapsulate it in udp/tcp
<4> the control port yeah
<2> you dont have to...
<4> but the acutal voice is random
<4> atleast thats what voip-info says
<2> wasnt aware...
<3> im sure there must be a random selection within a range
<10> well I thought vonage and all them gave you a router to use with their service
<2> nathanGL: not the point. still hard to organise port forwarding if you dont have control over your nat gateway
<2> s/hard/impossible/
<10> yeah true and in his case it seems like he can't do that
<4> i do over nat gateway
<4> but vontage's sip servers are not behind nat
<3> SDP negotiates the ports
<4> its just a problem when you have server | nat -> internet <- nat | client
<10> ahhh
<3> Note: For transports based on UDP, the value should be in the range 1024 to 65535 inclusive. For RTP compliance it should be an even number.
<3> there :P
<10> nathanGL: LOL
<3> so that limits you to ....
<3> approximately 32000 ports to open
<4> indeed
<3> heh
<4> what i did was just put a asterisk box on teh internet
<4> run iax2 and sip on it
<4> but still static ip would be better
<10> yea
<10> I wish it would rain here :(
<2> an. even. number.
<2> wtf is that about?
Return to
#gentoo
or
Go to some related
logs:
cewek x
#linuxhelp
QUOTES FROM GOOFELLAS
#gentoo
#italy
#politics
#bsd
#stocks
#politics
#cisco
|
|